Cargando…
Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Meningioma, a type of brain tumor, is a common incidental finding on brain imaging. The best management approach for patients with an incidental meningioma remains unclear. This retrospective multi-center study investigated the outcomes of patients with an incidental meningioma in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051300 |
_version_ | 1784666067055935488 |
---|---|
author | Islim, Abdurrahman I. Mantziaris, Georgios Pikis, Stylianos Chen, Ching-Jen Bunevicius, Adomas Peker, Selçuk Samanci, Yavuz Nabeel, Ahmed M. Reda, Wael A. Tawadros, Sameh R. El-Shehaby, Amr M. N. Abdelkarim, Khaled Emad, Reem M. Delabar, Violaine Mathieu, David Lee, Cheng-Chia Yang, Huai-Che Liscak, Roman May, Jaromir Alvarez, Roberto Martinez Moreno, Nuria Martinez Tripathi, Manjul Kondziolka, Douglas Speckter, Herwin Albert, Camilo Bowden, Greg N. Benveniste, Ronald J. Lunsford, Lawrence Dade Sheehan, Jason P. Jenkinson, Michael D. |
author_facet | Islim, Abdurrahman I. Mantziaris, Georgios Pikis, Stylianos Chen, Ching-Jen Bunevicius, Adomas Peker, Selçuk Samanci, Yavuz Nabeel, Ahmed M. Reda, Wael A. Tawadros, Sameh R. El-Shehaby, Amr M. N. Abdelkarim, Khaled Emad, Reem M. Delabar, Violaine Mathieu, David Lee, Cheng-Chia Yang, Huai-Che Liscak, Roman May, Jaromir Alvarez, Roberto Martinez Moreno, Nuria Martinez Tripathi, Manjul Kondziolka, Douglas Speckter, Herwin Albert, Camilo Bowden, Greg N. Benveniste, Ronald J. Lunsford, Lawrence Dade Sheehan, Jason P. Jenkinson, Michael D. |
author_sort | Islim, Abdurrahman I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Meningioma, a type of brain tumor, is a common incidental finding on brain imaging. The best management approach for patients with an incidental meningioma remains unclear. This retrospective multi-center study investigated the outcomes of patients with an incidental meningioma in a frontobasal location, who were managed with active surveillance (n = 28) compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 84). Within 5 years of follow-up, SRS improved the radiological control of incidental frontobasal meningiomas (0% vs. 52%), but no symptoms occurred in either group. In the active surveillance cohort, 12% underwent an intervention for tumor growth. The findings of this study provide information to enable shared decision making between clinicians and patients with incidental frontobasal meningiomas. ABSTRACT: Meningioma is a common incidental finding, and clinical course varies based on anatomical location. The aim of this sub-analysis of the IMPASSE study was to compare the outcomes of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma who underwent active surveillance to those who underwent upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Data were retrospectively collected from 14 centres. The active surveillance (n = 28) and SRS (n = 84) cohorts were compared unmatched and matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up (n = 25 each). The study endpoints included tumor progression, new symptom development, and need for further intervention. Tumor progression occurred in 52.0% and 0% of the matched active surveillance and SRS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.0%) treated with SRS developed treatment related symptoms compared to none in the active monitoring cohort (p = 0.329). No patients in the matched cohorts developed symptoms attributable to treatment. Three patients managed with active surveillance (10.7%, unmatched; 12.0%, matched) underwent an intervention for tumor growth with no persistent side effects after treatment. No patients subject to SRS underwent further treatment. Active monitoring and SRS confer a similarly low risk of symptom development. Upfront treatment with SRS improves imaging-defined tumor control. Active surveillance and SRS are acceptable treatment options for incidental frontobasal meningioma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8909178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89091782022-03-11 Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study Islim, Abdurrahman I. Mantziaris, Georgios Pikis, Stylianos Chen, Ching-Jen Bunevicius, Adomas Peker, Selçuk Samanci, Yavuz Nabeel, Ahmed M. Reda, Wael A. Tawadros, Sameh R. El-Shehaby, Amr M. N. Abdelkarim, Khaled Emad, Reem M. Delabar, Violaine Mathieu, David Lee, Cheng-Chia Yang, Huai-Che Liscak, Roman May, Jaromir Alvarez, Roberto Martinez Moreno, Nuria Martinez Tripathi, Manjul Kondziolka, Douglas Speckter, Herwin Albert, Camilo Bowden, Greg N. Benveniste, Ronald J. Lunsford, Lawrence Dade Sheehan, Jason P. Jenkinson, Michael D. Cancers (Basel) Communication SIMPLE SUMMARY: Meningioma, a type of brain tumor, is a common incidental finding on brain imaging. The best management approach for patients with an incidental meningioma remains unclear. This retrospective multi-center study investigated the outcomes of patients with an incidental meningioma in a frontobasal location, who were managed with active surveillance (n = 28) compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (n = 84). Within 5 years of follow-up, SRS improved the radiological control of incidental frontobasal meningiomas (0% vs. 52%), but no symptoms occurred in either group. In the active surveillance cohort, 12% underwent an intervention for tumor growth. The findings of this study provide information to enable shared decision making between clinicians and patients with incidental frontobasal meningiomas. ABSTRACT: Meningioma is a common incidental finding, and clinical course varies based on anatomical location. The aim of this sub-analysis of the IMPASSE study was to compare the outcomes of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma who underwent active surveillance to those who underwent upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Data were retrospectively collected from 14 centres. The active surveillance (n = 28) and SRS (n = 84) cohorts were compared unmatched and matched for age, sex, and duration of follow-up (n = 25 each). The study endpoints included tumor progression, new symptom development, and need for further intervention. Tumor progression occurred in 52.0% and 0% of the matched active surveillance and SRS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients (6.0%) treated with SRS developed treatment related symptoms compared to none in the active monitoring cohort (p = 0.329). No patients in the matched cohorts developed symptoms attributable to treatment. Three patients managed with active surveillance (10.7%, unmatched; 12.0%, matched) underwent an intervention for tumor growth with no persistent side effects after treatment. No patients subject to SRS underwent further treatment. Active monitoring and SRS confer a similarly low risk of symptom development. Upfront treatment with SRS improves imaging-defined tumor control. Active surveillance and SRS are acceptable treatment options for incidental frontobasal meningioma. MDPI 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8909178/ /pubmed/35267608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051300 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Islim, Abdurrahman I. Mantziaris, Georgios Pikis, Stylianos Chen, Ching-Jen Bunevicius, Adomas Peker, Selçuk Samanci, Yavuz Nabeel, Ahmed M. Reda, Wael A. Tawadros, Sameh R. El-Shehaby, Amr M. N. Abdelkarim, Khaled Emad, Reem M. Delabar, Violaine Mathieu, David Lee, Cheng-Chia Yang, Huai-Che Liscak, Roman May, Jaromir Alvarez, Roberto Martinez Moreno, Nuria Martinez Tripathi, Manjul Kondziolka, Douglas Speckter, Herwin Albert, Camilo Bowden, Greg N. Benveniste, Ronald J. Lunsford, Lawrence Dade Sheehan, Jason P. Jenkinson, Michael D. Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study |
title | Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study |
title_full | Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study |
title_short | Comparison of Active Surveillance to Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Management of Patients with an Incidental Frontobasal Meningioma—A Sub-Analysis of the IMPASSE Study |
title_sort | comparison of active surveillance to stereotactic radiosurgery for the management of patients with an incidental frontobasal meningioma—a sub-analysis of the impasse study |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islimabdurrahmani comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT mantziarisgeorgios comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT pikisstylianos comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT chenchingjen comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT buneviciusadomas comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT pekerselcuk comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT samanciyavuz comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT nabeelahmedm comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT redawaela comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT tawadrossamehr comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT elshehabyamrmn comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT abdelkarimkhaled comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT emadreemm comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT delabarviolaine comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT mathieudavid comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT leechengchia comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT yanghuaiche comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT liscakroman comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT mayjaromir comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT alvarezrobertomartinez comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT morenonuriamartinez comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT tripathimanjul comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT kondziolkadouglas comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT speckterherwin comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT albertcamilo comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT bowdengregn comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT benvenisteronaldj comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT lunsfordlawrencedade comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT sheehanjasonp comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy AT jenkinsonmichaeld comparisonofactivesurveillancetostereotacticradiosurgeryforthemanagementofpatientswithanincidentalfrontobasalmeningiomaasubanalysisoftheimpassestudy |