Cargando…

Efficacy of Retreatment with Oxaliplatin-Based Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: The RETROX-CRC Retrospective Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimens in late-care settings have been poorly reported. In 119 mCRC patients, the oxaliplatin retreatment response rate (RR) was 21.6%. The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months. A total of 34/119 (28.6%) discontinued treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amatu, Alessio, Mauri, Gianluca, Tosi, Federica, Bencardino, Katia, Bonazzina, Erica, Gori, Viviana, Ruggieri, Lorenzo, Arena, Sabrina, Bardelli, Alberto, Marsoni, Silvia, Siena, Salvatore, Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051197
Descripción
Sumario:SIMPLE SUMMARY: The efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimens in late-care settings have been poorly reported. In 119 mCRC patients, the oxaliplatin retreatment response rate (RR) was 21.6%. The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months. A total of 34/119 (28.6%) discontinued treatments were due to toxicities. Oxaliplatin retreatment produced further RR, but one-third of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Thus, translational studies that improve patient selections are warranted. ABSTRACT: Background: oxaliplatin with fluoropyrimidine is a “mainstay” regarding the upfront treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In contrast, the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimens in late-care settings have been poorly reported. Methods: we identified a real-world mCRC patient cohort who were re-treated with oxaliplatin, and in which clinicopathological features were retrospectively analyzed to identify efficacy–predictive determinants (RETROX-CRC study). Results: of 2606 patients, 119 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Oxaliplatin retreatment response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 21.6% (CI 14.4–31.0%), and 57.8% (CI 47.7–67.4). A trend towards better RR and DCR was observed among patients who had first oxaliplatin in an adjuvant setting; a poorer outcome was observed if two or more intervening treatments were delivered. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months (95%CI 4.3–6.1), reducing to 4.0 months (95%CI 3.07–5.13) if oxaliplatin was readministered beyond third-line (HR 2.02; 1.25–3.25; p = 0.004). Safety data were retrieved in 65 patients (54.6%); 18.5% (12/65) and 7.7% (5/65) had G3–4 toxicities. Toxicities led to discontinuation in 34/119 (28.6%). Conclusions: oxaliplatin retreatment produced further RR in around one-fifth of patients and DCR 57.8%. Efficacy decreased in more pre-treated patients and around one-third of patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Translational studies improving patient selection are warranted.