Cargando…
Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance
Here, we review the role of the circadian clock (CC) in the resistance of cancer cells to genotoxic treatments in relation to whole-genome duplication (WGD) and telomere-length regulation. The CC drives the normal cell cycle, tissue differentiation, and reciprocally regulates telomere elongation. Ho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11050880 |
_version_ | 1784666118512705536 |
---|---|
author | Vainshelbaum, Ninel Miriam Salmina, Kristine Gerashchenko, Bogdan I. Lazovska, Marija Zayakin, Pawel Cragg, Mark Steven Pjanova, Dace Erenpreisa, Jekaterina |
author_facet | Vainshelbaum, Ninel Miriam Salmina, Kristine Gerashchenko, Bogdan I. Lazovska, Marija Zayakin, Pawel Cragg, Mark Steven Pjanova, Dace Erenpreisa, Jekaterina |
author_sort | Vainshelbaum, Ninel Miriam |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here, we review the role of the circadian clock (CC) in the resistance of cancer cells to genotoxic treatments in relation to whole-genome duplication (WGD) and telomere-length regulation. The CC drives the normal cell cycle, tissue differentiation, and reciprocally regulates telomere elongation. However, it is deregulated in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), the early embryo, and cancer. Here, we review the DNA damage response of cancer cells and a similar impact on the cell cycle to that found in ESCs—overcoming G1/S, adapting DNA damage checkpoints, tolerating DNA damage, coupling telomere erosion to accelerated cell senescence, and favouring transition by mitotic slippage into the ploidy cycle (reversible polyploidy). Polyploidy decelerates the CC. We report an intriguing positive correlation between cancer WGD and the deregulation of the CC assessed by bioinformatics on 11 primary cancer datasets (rho = 0.83; p < 0.01). As previously shown, the cancer cells undergoing mitotic slippage cast off telomere fragments with TERT, restore the telomeres by ALT-recombination, and return their depolyploidised offspring to telomerase-dependent regulation. By reversing this polyploidy and the CC “death loop”, the mitotic cycle and Hayflick limit count are thus again renewed. Our review and proposed mechanism support a life-cycle concept of cancer and highlight the perspective of cancer treatment by differentiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8909334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89093342022-03-11 Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance Vainshelbaum, Ninel Miriam Salmina, Kristine Gerashchenko, Bogdan I. Lazovska, Marija Zayakin, Pawel Cragg, Mark Steven Pjanova, Dace Erenpreisa, Jekaterina Cells Perspective Here, we review the role of the circadian clock (CC) in the resistance of cancer cells to genotoxic treatments in relation to whole-genome duplication (WGD) and telomere-length regulation. The CC drives the normal cell cycle, tissue differentiation, and reciprocally regulates telomere elongation. However, it is deregulated in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), the early embryo, and cancer. Here, we review the DNA damage response of cancer cells and a similar impact on the cell cycle to that found in ESCs—overcoming G1/S, adapting DNA damage checkpoints, tolerating DNA damage, coupling telomere erosion to accelerated cell senescence, and favouring transition by mitotic slippage into the ploidy cycle (reversible polyploidy). Polyploidy decelerates the CC. We report an intriguing positive correlation between cancer WGD and the deregulation of the CC assessed by bioinformatics on 11 primary cancer datasets (rho = 0.83; p < 0.01). As previously shown, the cancer cells undergoing mitotic slippage cast off telomere fragments with TERT, restore the telomeres by ALT-recombination, and return their depolyploidised offspring to telomerase-dependent regulation. By reversing this polyploidy and the CC “death loop”, the mitotic cycle and Hayflick limit count are thus again renewed. Our review and proposed mechanism support a life-cycle concept of cancer and highlight the perspective of cancer treatment by differentiation. MDPI 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8909334/ /pubmed/35269502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11050880 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Perspective Vainshelbaum, Ninel Miriam Salmina, Kristine Gerashchenko, Bogdan I. Lazovska, Marija Zayakin, Pawel Cragg, Mark Steven Pjanova, Dace Erenpreisa, Jekaterina Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance |
title | Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance |
title_full | Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance |
title_fullStr | Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance |
title_short | Role of the Circadian Clock “Death-Loop” in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance |
title_sort | role of the circadian clock “death-loop” in the dna damage response underpinning cancer treatment resistance |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11050880 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vainshelbaumninelmiriam roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT salminakristine roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT gerashchenkobogdani roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT lazovskamarija roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT zayakinpawel roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT craggmarksteven roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT pjanovadace roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance AT erenpreisajekaterina roleofthecircadianclockdeathloopinthednadamageresponseunderpinningcancertreatmentresistance |