Cargando…

Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study evaluates the use of acoustic devices as a method to monitor wolves by analyzing different variables extracted from wolf howls. By analyzing the wolf howls, we focused on identifying individual wolves, subspecies. We analyzed 170 howls from 16 individuals from the three su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, Hanne Lyngholm, Pertoldi, Cino, Madsen, Niels, Randi, Ettore, Stronen, Astrid Vik, Root-Gutteridge, Holly, Pagh, Sussie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12050631
_version_ 1784666162085232640
author Larsen, Hanne Lyngholm
Pertoldi, Cino
Madsen, Niels
Randi, Ettore
Stronen, Astrid Vik
Root-Gutteridge, Holly
Pagh, Sussie
author_facet Larsen, Hanne Lyngholm
Pertoldi, Cino
Madsen, Niels
Randi, Ettore
Stronen, Astrid Vik
Root-Gutteridge, Holly
Pagh, Sussie
author_sort Larsen, Hanne Lyngholm
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study evaluates the use of acoustic devices as a method to monitor wolves by analyzing different variables extracted from wolf howls. By analyzing the wolf howls, we focused on identifying individual wolves, subspecies. We analyzed 170 howls from 16 individuals from the three subspecies: Arctic wolves (Canis lupus arctos), Eurasian wolves (C.l. lupus), and Northwestern wolves (C.l. occidentalis). We assessed the potential for individual recognition and recognition of three subspecies: Arctic, Eurasian, and Northwestern wolves. ABSTRACT: Wolves (Canis lupus) are generally monitored by visual observations, camera traps, and DNA traces. In this study, we evaluated acoustic monitoring of wolf howls as a method for monitoring wolves, which may permit detection of wolves across longer distances than that permitted by camera traps. We analyzed acoustic data of wolves’ howls collected from both wild and captive ones. The analysis focused on individual and subspecies recognition. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the usefulness of acoustic monitoring in the field given the limited data for Eurasian wolves. We analyzed 170 howls from 16 individual wolves from 3 subspecies: Arctic (Canis lupus arctos), Eurasian (C. l. lupus), and Northwestern wolves (C. l. occidentalis). Variables from the fundamental frequency (f0) (lowest frequency band of a sound signal) were extracted and used in discriminant analysis, classification matrix, and pairwise post-hoc Hotelling test. The results indicated that Arctic and Eurasian wolves had subspecies identifiable calls, while Northwestern wolves did not, though this sample size was small. Identification on an individual level was successful for all subspecies. Individuals were correctly classified with 80%–100% accuracy, using discriminant function analysis. Our findings suggest acoustic monitoring could be a valuable and cost-effective tool that complements camera traps, by improving long-distance detection of wolves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8909475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89094752022-03-11 Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls Larsen, Hanne Lyngholm Pertoldi, Cino Madsen, Niels Randi, Ettore Stronen, Astrid Vik Root-Gutteridge, Holly Pagh, Sussie Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study evaluates the use of acoustic devices as a method to monitor wolves by analyzing different variables extracted from wolf howls. By analyzing the wolf howls, we focused on identifying individual wolves, subspecies. We analyzed 170 howls from 16 individuals from the three subspecies: Arctic wolves (Canis lupus arctos), Eurasian wolves (C.l. lupus), and Northwestern wolves (C.l. occidentalis). We assessed the potential for individual recognition and recognition of three subspecies: Arctic, Eurasian, and Northwestern wolves. ABSTRACT: Wolves (Canis lupus) are generally monitored by visual observations, camera traps, and DNA traces. In this study, we evaluated acoustic monitoring of wolf howls as a method for monitoring wolves, which may permit detection of wolves across longer distances than that permitted by camera traps. We analyzed acoustic data of wolves’ howls collected from both wild and captive ones. The analysis focused on individual and subspecies recognition. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the usefulness of acoustic monitoring in the field given the limited data for Eurasian wolves. We analyzed 170 howls from 16 individual wolves from 3 subspecies: Arctic (Canis lupus arctos), Eurasian (C. l. lupus), and Northwestern wolves (C. l. occidentalis). Variables from the fundamental frequency (f0) (lowest frequency band of a sound signal) were extracted and used in discriminant analysis, classification matrix, and pairwise post-hoc Hotelling test. The results indicated that Arctic and Eurasian wolves had subspecies identifiable calls, while Northwestern wolves did not, though this sample size was small. Identification on an individual level was successful for all subspecies. Individuals were correctly classified with 80%–100% accuracy, using discriminant function analysis. Our findings suggest acoustic monitoring could be a valuable and cost-effective tool that complements camera traps, by improving long-distance detection of wolves. MDPI 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8909475/ /pubmed/35268200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12050631 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Larsen, Hanne Lyngholm
Pertoldi, Cino
Madsen, Niels
Randi, Ettore
Stronen, Astrid Vik
Root-Gutteridge, Holly
Pagh, Sussie
Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls
title Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls
title_full Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls
title_fullStr Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls
title_full_unstemmed Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls
title_short Bioacoustic Detection of Wolves: Identifying Subspecies and Individuals by Howls
title_sort bioacoustic detection of wolves: identifying subspecies and individuals by howls
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12050631
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenhannelyngholm bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls
AT pertoldicino bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls
AT madsenniels bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls
AT randiettore bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls
AT stronenastridvik bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls
AT rootgutteridgeholly bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls
AT paghsussie bioacousticdetectionofwolvesidentifyingsubspeciesandindividualsbyhowls