Cargando…

Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits

Gluten is composed of prolamin and glutelin proteins from several related grains. Because these proteins are not present in identical ratios in the various grains and because they have some differences in sequence, the ability to accurately quantify the overall amount of gluten in various food matri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amnuaycheewa, Plaimein, Niemann, Lynn, Goodman, Richard E., Baumert, Joseph L., Taylor, Steve L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11050706
_version_ 1784666230385278976
author Amnuaycheewa, Plaimein
Niemann, Lynn
Goodman, Richard E.
Baumert, Joseph L.
Taylor, Steve L.
author_facet Amnuaycheewa, Plaimein
Niemann, Lynn
Goodman, Richard E.
Baumert, Joseph L.
Taylor, Steve L.
author_sort Amnuaycheewa, Plaimein
collection PubMed
description Gluten is composed of prolamin and glutelin proteins from several related grains. Because these proteins are not present in identical ratios in the various grains and because they have some differences in sequence, the ability to accurately quantify the overall amount of gluten in various food matrices to support gluten-free labeling is difficult. Four sandwich ELISAs (the R-Biopharm AG R5 RIDASCREEN(®), the Neogen Veratox(®) R5, the Romer Labs AgraQuant(®) G12, and the Morinaga Wheat kits) were evaluated for their performance to quantify gluten concentrations in various foods and ingredients. The Morinaga and AgraQuant(®) G12 tests yielded results comparable to the two R5 kits for most, but not for certain, foods. The results obtained with the Morinaga kit were lower when compared to the other kits for analyzing powders of buckwheat and several grass-based products. All four kits were capable of detecting multiple gluten-containing grain sources including wheat, rye, barley, semolina, triticale, spelt, emmer, einkorn, Kamut™, and club wheat. Users of the ELISA kits should verify the performance in their hands, with matrices that are typical for their specific uses. The variation in results for some food matrices between test methods could result in trade disputes or regulatory disagreements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8909647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89096472022-03-11 Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits Amnuaycheewa, Plaimein Niemann, Lynn Goodman, Richard E. Baumert, Joseph L. Taylor, Steve L. Foods Article Gluten is composed of prolamin and glutelin proteins from several related grains. Because these proteins are not present in identical ratios in the various grains and because they have some differences in sequence, the ability to accurately quantify the overall amount of gluten in various food matrices to support gluten-free labeling is difficult. Four sandwich ELISAs (the R-Biopharm AG R5 RIDASCREEN(®), the Neogen Veratox(®) R5, the Romer Labs AgraQuant(®) G12, and the Morinaga Wheat kits) were evaluated for their performance to quantify gluten concentrations in various foods and ingredients. The Morinaga and AgraQuant(®) G12 tests yielded results comparable to the two R5 kits for most, but not for certain, foods. The results obtained with the Morinaga kit were lower when compared to the other kits for analyzing powders of buckwheat and several grass-based products. All four kits were capable of detecting multiple gluten-containing grain sources including wheat, rye, barley, semolina, triticale, spelt, emmer, einkorn, Kamut™, and club wheat. Users of the ELISA kits should verify the performance in their hands, with matrices that are typical for their specific uses. The variation in results for some food matrices between test methods could result in trade disputes or regulatory disagreements. MDPI 2022-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8909647/ /pubmed/35267339 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11050706 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Amnuaycheewa, Plaimein
Niemann, Lynn
Goodman, Richard E.
Baumert, Joseph L.
Taylor, Steve L.
Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits
title Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits
title_full Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits
title_fullStr Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits
title_short Challenges in Gluten Analysis: A Comparison of Four Commercial Sandwich ELISA Kits
title_sort challenges in gluten analysis: a comparison of four commercial sandwich elisa kits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267339
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11050706
work_keys_str_mv AT amnuaycheewaplaimein challengesinglutenanalysisacomparisonoffourcommercialsandwichelisakits
AT niemannlynn challengesinglutenanalysisacomparisonoffourcommercialsandwichelisakits
AT goodmanricharde challengesinglutenanalysisacomparisonoffourcommercialsandwichelisakits
AT baumertjosephl challengesinglutenanalysisacomparisonoffourcommercialsandwichelisakits
AT taylorstevel challengesinglutenanalysisacomparisonoffourcommercialsandwichelisakits