Cargando…
Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM). To evaluate markers for treatment response and find a treatment concept which has the best outcome effects, we analyzed data of 93 patients with BM from different cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051240 |
_version_ | 1784666251894718464 |
---|---|
author | Trommer, Maike Adams, Anne Celik, Eren Fan, Jiaqi Funken, Dominik Herter, Jan M. Linde, Philipp Morgenthaler, Janis Wegen, Simone Mauch, Cornelia Franklin, Cindy Galldiks, Norbert Werner, Jan-Michael Kocher, Martin Rueß, Daniel Ruge, Maximilian Meißner, Anna-Katharina Baues, Christian Marnitz, Simone |
author_facet | Trommer, Maike Adams, Anne Celik, Eren Fan, Jiaqi Funken, Dominik Herter, Jan M. Linde, Philipp Morgenthaler, Janis Wegen, Simone Mauch, Cornelia Franklin, Cindy Galldiks, Norbert Werner, Jan-Michael Kocher, Martin Rueß, Daniel Ruge, Maximilian Meißner, Anna-Katharina Baues, Christian Marnitz, Simone |
author_sort | Trommer, Maike |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM). To evaluate markers for treatment response and find a treatment concept which has the best outcome effects, we analyzed data of 93 patients with BM from different cancer types. Predictive markers for survival were good performance status, melanoma as cancer type, low metastasis volume, normal inflammatory blood parameters, and a stereotactic radiotherapy concept with high doses. We found that the best survival outcome can be achieved with the concurrent use of RT and ICI. Concurrent treatment was particularly beneficial in patients with low inflammatory status and more and larger metastases, and when high doses cannot be administered. In concurrently treated patients, therapeutic response was often delayed compared to sequential treatment. Specific immune responses such as pseudoprogression and abscopal effects were induced by concurrent treatment and associated with prolonged survival. ABSTRACT: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM), markers that predict treatment response for combined RT and ICI (RT-ICI) and their optimal dosing and sequence for the best immunogenic effects are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors for therapeutic outcome and to compare effects of concurrent and non-concurrent RT-ICI. We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 patients with 319 BMs of different cancer types who received PD-1 inhibitors and RT at the University Hospital Cologne between September/2014 and November/2020. Primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC). We included 66.7% melanoma, 22.8% lung, and 5.5% other cancer types with a mean follow-up time of 23.8 months. Median OS time was 12.19 months. LC at 6 months was 95.3% (concurrent) vs. 69.2% (non-concurrent; p = 0.008). Univariate Cox regression analysis detected following prognostic factors for OS: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio NLR favoring <3 (low; HR 2.037 (1.184–3.506), p = 0.010), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) favoring ≤ULN (HR 1.853 (1.059–3.241), p = 0.031), absence of neurological symptoms (HR 2.114 (1.285–3.478), p = 0.003), RT concept favoring SRS (HR 1.985 (1.112–3.543), p = 0.019), RT dose favoring ≥60 Gy (HR 0.519 (0.309–0.871), p = 0.013), and prior anti-CTLA4 treatment (HR 0.498 (0.271–0.914), p = 0.024). Independent prognostic factors for OS were concurrent RT-ICI application (HR 0.539 (0.299–0.971), p = 0.024) with a median OS of 17.61 vs. 6.83 months (non-concurrent), ECOG performance status favoring 0 (HR 7.756 (1.253–6.061), p = 0.012), cancer type favoring melanoma (HR 0.516 (0.288–0.926), p = 0.026), BM volume (PTV) favoring ≤3 cm(3) (HR 1.947 (1.007–3.763), p = 0.048). Subgroups with the following factors showed significantly longer OS when being treated concurrently: RT dose <60 Gy (p = 0.014), PTV > 3 cm(3) (p = 0.007), other cancer types than melanoma (p = 0.006), anti-CTLA4-naïve patients (p < 0.001), low NLR (p = 0.039), steroid intake ≤4 mg (p = 0.042). Specific immune responses, such as abscopal effects (AbEs), pseudoprogression (PsP), or immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), occurred more frequently with concurrent RT-ICI and resulted in better OS. Other toxicities, including radionecrosis, were not statistically different in both groups. The concurrent application of RT and ICI, the ECOG-PS, cancer type, and PTV had an independently prognostic impact on OS. In concurrently treated patients, treatment response (LC) was delayed and specific immune responses (AbE, PsP, IrAE) occurred more frequently with longer OS rates. Our results suggest that concurrent RT-ICI application is more beneficial than sequential treatment in patients with low pretreatment inflammatory status, more and larger BMs, and with other cancer types than melanoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8909717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89097172022-03-11 Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups Trommer, Maike Adams, Anne Celik, Eren Fan, Jiaqi Funken, Dominik Herter, Jan M. Linde, Philipp Morgenthaler, Janis Wegen, Simone Mauch, Cornelia Franklin, Cindy Galldiks, Norbert Werner, Jan-Michael Kocher, Martin Rueß, Daniel Ruge, Maximilian Meißner, Anna-Katharina Baues, Christian Marnitz, Simone Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM). To evaluate markers for treatment response and find a treatment concept which has the best outcome effects, we analyzed data of 93 patients with BM from different cancer types. Predictive markers for survival were good performance status, melanoma as cancer type, low metastasis volume, normal inflammatory blood parameters, and a stereotactic radiotherapy concept with high doses. We found that the best survival outcome can be achieved with the concurrent use of RT and ICI. Concurrent treatment was particularly beneficial in patients with low inflammatory status and more and larger metastases, and when high doses cannot be administered. In concurrently treated patients, therapeutic response was often delayed compared to sequential treatment. Specific immune responses such as pseudoprogression and abscopal effects were induced by concurrent treatment and associated with prolonged survival. ABSTRACT: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM), markers that predict treatment response for combined RT and ICI (RT-ICI) and their optimal dosing and sequence for the best immunogenic effects are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors for therapeutic outcome and to compare effects of concurrent and non-concurrent RT-ICI. We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 patients with 319 BMs of different cancer types who received PD-1 inhibitors and RT at the University Hospital Cologne between September/2014 and November/2020. Primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC). We included 66.7% melanoma, 22.8% lung, and 5.5% other cancer types with a mean follow-up time of 23.8 months. Median OS time was 12.19 months. LC at 6 months was 95.3% (concurrent) vs. 69.2% (non-concurrent; p = 0.008). Univariate Cox regression analysis detected following prognostic factors for OS: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio NLR favoring <3 (low; HR 2.037 (1.184–3.506), p = 0.010), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) favoring ≤ULN (HR 1.853 (1.059–3.241), p = 0.031), absence of neurological symptoms (HR 2.114 (1.285–3.478), p = 0.003), RT concept favoring SRS (HR 1.985 (1.112–3.543), p = 0.019), RT dose favoring ≥60 Gy (HR 0.519 (0.309–0.871), p = 0.013), and prior anti-CTLA4 treatment (HR 0.498 (0.271–0.914), p = 0.024). Independent prognostic factors for OS were concurrent RT-ICI application (HR 0.539 (0.299–0.971), p = 0.024) with a median OS of 17.61 vs. 6.83 months (non-concurrent), ECOG performance status favoring 0 (HR 7.756 (1.253–6.061), p = 0.012), cancer type favoring melanoma (HR 0.516 (0.288–0.926), p = 0.026), BM volume (PTV) favoring ≤3 cm(3) (HR 1.947 (1.007–3.763), p = 0.048). Subgroups with the following factors showed significantly longer OS when being treated concurrently: RT dose <60 Gy (p = 0.014), PTV > 3 cm(3) (p = 0.007), other cancer types than melanoma (p = 0.006), anti-CTLA4-naïve patients (p < 0.001), low NLR (p = 0.039), steroid intake ≤4 mg (p = 0.042). Specific immune responses, such as abscopal effects (AbEs), pseudoprogression (PsP), or immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), occurred more frequently with concurrent RT-ICI and resulted in better OS. Other toxicities, including radionecrosis, were not statistically different in both groups. The concurrent application of RT and ICI, the ECOG-PS, cancer type, and PTV had an independently prognostic impact on OS. In concurrently treated patients, treatment response (LC) was delayed and specific immune responses (AbE, PsP, IrAE) occurred more frequently with longer OS rates. Our results suggest that concurrent RT-ICI application is more beneficial than sequential treatment in patients with low pretreatment inflammatory status, more and larger BMs, and with other cancer types than melanoma. MDPI 2022-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8909717/ /pubmed/35267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051240 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Trommer, Maike Adams, Anne Celik, Eren Fan, Jiaqi Funken, Dominik Herter, Jan M. Linde, Philipp Morgenthaler, Janis Wegen, Simone Mauch, Cornelia Franklin, Cindy Galldiks, Norbert Werner, Jan-Michael Kocher, Martin Rueß, Daniel Ruge, Maximilian Meißner, Anna-Katharina Baues, Christian Marnitz, Simone Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups |
title | Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups |
title_full | Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups |
title_fullStr | Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups |
title_short | Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups |
title_sort | oncologic outcome and immune responses of radiotherapy with anti-pd-1 treatment for brain metastases regarding timing and benefiting subgroups |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8909717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trommermaike oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT adamsanne oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT celikeren oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT fanjiaqi oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT funkendominik oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT herterjanm oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT lindephilipp oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT morgenthalerjanis oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT wegensimone oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT mauchcornelia oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT franklincindy oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT galldiksnorbert oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT wernerjanmichael oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT kochermartin oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT rueßdaniel oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT rugemaximilian oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT meißnerannakatharina oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT baueschristian oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups AT marnitzsimone oncologicoutcomeandimmuneresponsesofradiotherapywithantipd1treatmentforbrainmetastasesregardingtimingandbenefitingsubgroups |