Cargando…
Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications
Research interest in nanoscale biomaterials has continued to grow in the past few decades, driving the need to form families of nanomaterials grouped by similar physical or chemical properties. Nanotubes have occupied a unique space in this field, primarily due to their high versatility in a wide ra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052640 |
_version_ | 1784666379243225088 |
---|---|
author | Griger, Sydney Sands, Ian Chen, Yupeng |
author_facet | Griger, Sydney Sands, Ian Chen, Yupeng |
author_sort | Griger, Sydney |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research interest in nanoscale biomaterials has continued to grow in the past few decades, driving the need to form families of nanomaterials grouped by similar physical or chemical properties. Nanotubes have occupied a unique space in this field, primarily due to their high versatility in a wide range of biomedical applications. Although similar in morphology, members of this nanomaterial family widely differ in synthesis methods, mechanical and physiochemical properties, and therapeutic applications. As this field continues to develop, it is important to provide insight into novel biomaterial developments and their overall impact on current technology and therapeutics. In this review, we aim to characterize and compare two members of the nanotube family: carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and janus-base nanotubes (JBNts). While CNTs have been extensively studied for decades, JBNts provide a fresh perspective on many therapeutic modalities bound by the limitations of carbon-based nanomaterials. Herein, we characterize the morphology, synthesis, and applications of CNTs and JBNts to provide a comprehensive comparison between these nanomaterial technologies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8910125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89101252022-03-11 Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications Griger, Sydney Sands, Ian Chen, Yupeng Int J Mol Sci Review Research interest in nanoscale biomaterials has continued to grow in the past few decades, driving the need to form families of nanomaterials grouped by similar physical or chemical properties. Nanotubes have occupied a unique space in this field, primarily due to their high versatility in a wide range of biomedical applications. Although similar in morphology, members of this nanomaterial family widely differ in synthesis methods, mechanical and physiochemical properties, and therapeutic applications. As this field continues to develop, it is important to provide insight into novel biomaterial developments and their overall impact on current technology and therapeutics. In this review, we aim to characterize and compare two members of the nanotube family: carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and janus-base nanotubes (JBNts). While CNTs have been extensively studied for decades, JBNts provide a fresh perspective on many therapeutic modalities bound by the limitations of carbon-based nanomaterials. Herein, we characterize the morphology, synthesis, and applications of CNTs and JBNts to provide a comprehensive comparison between these nanomaterial technologies. MDPI 2022-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8910125/ /pubmed/35269782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052640 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Griger, Sydney Sands, Ian Chen, Yupeng Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications |
title | Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications |
title_full | Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications |
title_short | Comparison between Janus-Base Nanotubes and Carbon Nanotubes: A Review on Synthesis, Physicochemical Properties, and Applications |
title_sort | comparison between janus-base nanotubes and carbon nanotubes: a review on synthesis, physicochemical properties, and applications |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grigersydney comparisonbetweenjanusbasenanotubesandcarbonnanotubesareviewonsynthesisphysicochemicalpropertiesandapplications AT sandsian comparisonbetweenjanusbasenanotubesandcarbonnanotubesareviewonsynthesisphysicochemicalpropertiesandapplications AT chenyupeng comparisonbetweenjanusbasenanotubesandcarbonnanotubesareviewonsynthesisphysicochemicalpropertiesandapplications |