Cargando…

Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells

Both the dental pulp and the apical papilla represent a promising source of mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative endodontic protocols. The aim of this study was to outline molecular biological conformities and differences between dental pulp stem cells (DPSC) and stem cells from the apical papill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smeda, Martyna, Galler, Kerstin M., Woelflick, Melanie, Rosendahl, Andreas, Moehle, Christoph, Lenhardt, Beate, Buchalla, Wolfgang, Widbiller, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052615
_version_ 1784666444542246912
author Smeda, Martyna
Galler, Kerstin M.
Woelflick, Melanie
Rosendahl, Andreas
Moehle, Christoph
Lenhardt, Beate
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Widbiller, Matthias
author_facet Smeda, Martyna
Galler, Kerstin M.
Woelflick, Melanie
Rosendahl, Andreas
Moehle, Christoph
Lenhardt, Beate
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Widbiller, Matthias
author_sort Smeda, Martyna
collection PubMed
description Both the dental pulp and the apical papilla represent a promising source of mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative endodontic protocols. The aim of this study was to outline molecular biological conformities and differences between dental pulp stem cells (DPSC) and stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP). Thus, cells were isolated from the pulp and the apical papilla of an extracted molar and analyzed for mesenchymal stem cell markers as well as multi-lineage differentiation. During induced osteogenic differentiation, viability, proliferation, and wound healing assays were performed, and secreted signaling molecules were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Transcriptome-wide gene expression was profiled by microarrays and validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Gene regulation was evaluated in the context of culture parameters and functionality. Both cell types expressed mesenchymal stem cell markers and were able to enter various lineages. DPSC and SCAP showed no significant differences in cell viability, proliferation, or migration; however, variations were observed in the profile of secreted molecules. Transcriptome analysis revealed the most significant gene regulation during the differentiation period, and 13 biomarkers were identified whose regulation was essential for both cell types. DPSC and SCAP share many features and their differentiation follows similar patterns. From a molecular biological perspective, both seem to be equally suitable for dental pulp tissue engineering.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8910327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89103272022-03-11 Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells Smeda, Martyna Galler, Kerstin M. Woelflick, Melanie Rosendahl, Andreas Moehle, Christoph Lenhardt, Beate Buchalla, Wolfgang Widbiller, Matthias Int J Mol Sci Article Both the dental pulp and the apical papilla represent a promising source of mesenchymal stem cells for regenerative endodontic protocols. The aim of this study was to outline molecular biological conformities and differences between dental pulp stem cells (DPSC) and stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP). Thus, cells were isolated from the pulp and the apical papilla of an extracted molar and analyzed for mesenchymal stem cell markers as well as multi-lineage differentiation. During induced osteogenic differentiation, viability, proliferation, and wound healing assays were performed, and secreted signaling molecules were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Transcriptome-wide gene expression was profiled by microarrays and validated by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Gene regulation was evaluated in the context of culture parameters and functionality. Both cell types expressed mesenchymal stem cell markers and were able to enter various lineages. DPSC and SCAP showed no significant differences in cell viability, proliferation, or migration; however, variations were observed in the profile of secreted molecules. Transcriptome analysis revealed the most significant gene regulation during the differentiation period, and 13 biomarkers were identified whose regulation was essential for both cell types. DPSC and SCAP share many features and their differentiation follows similar patterns. From a molecular biological perspective, both seem to be equally suitable for dental pulp tissue engineering. MDPI 2022-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8910327/ /pubmed/35269758 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052615 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Smeda, Martyna
Galler, Kerstin M.
Woelflick, Melanie
Rosendahl, Andreas
Moehle, Christoph
Lenhardt, Beate
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Widbiller, Matthias
Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells
title Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells
title_full Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells
title_fullStr Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells
title_short Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells
title_sort molecular biological comparison of dental pulp- and apical papilla-derived stem cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269758
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052615
work_keys_str_mv AT smedamartyna molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT gallerkerstinm molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT woelflickmelanie molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT rosendahlandreas molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT moehlechristoph molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT lenhardtbeate molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT buchallawolfgang molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells
AT widbillermatthias molecularbiologicalcomparisonofdentalpulpandapicalpapilladerivedstemcells