Cargando…

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Data investigating the prognostic value of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) usually focusses on patients presenting with heart failure (HF) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, by preventing adverse cardiac remodeling, ACEi/ARB may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schupp, Tobias, Behnes, Michael, Abumayyaleh, Mohammad, Weidner, Kathrin, Mashayekhi, Kambis, Bertsch, Thomas, Akin, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051460
_version_ 1784666593301626880
author Schupp, Tobias
Behnes, Michael
Abumayyaleh, Mohammad
Weidner, Kathrin
Mashayekhi, Kambis
Bertsch, Thomas
Akin, Ibrahim
author_facet Schupp, Tobias
Behnes, Michael
Abumayyaleh, Mohammad
Weidner, Kathrin
Mashayekhi, Kambis
Bertsch, Thomas
Akin, Ibrahim
author_sort Schupp, Tobias
collection PubMed
description Data investigating the prognostic value of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) usually focusses on patients presenting with heart failure (HF) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, by preventing adverse cardiac remodeling, ACEi/ARB may also decrease the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although ventricular tachyarrhythmias are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, only limited data are available focusing on the prognostic role of ACEi/ARB, when prescribed for secondary prevention of SCD. Therefore, this study comprehensively investigates the role of ACEi versus ARB in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. The primary prognostic outcome was all-cause mortality at three years, secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ICD therapies and sudden cardiac death) and cardiac rehospitalization. A total of 1236 patients were included (15% treated with ARB and 85% with ACEi) and followed for a median of 4.0 years. At three years, ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term mortality (20% vs. 17%; log rank p = 0.287; HR = 0.965; 95% CI 0.689–1.351; p = 0.835) and comparable risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint (HR = 1.227; 95% CI 0.841–1.790; p = 0.288). In contrast, ACEi was associated with a decreased risk of cardiac rehospitalization at three years (HR = 0.690; 95% CI 0.490–0.971; p = 0.033). Within the propensity score matched cohort (i.e., 158 patients with ACEi and ARB), ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term outcomes at three years. In conclusion, ACEi and ARB are associated with comparable risk of long-term outcomes in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8910841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89108412022-03-11 Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias Schupp, Tobias Behnes, Michael Abumayyaleh, Mohammad Weidner, Kathrin Mashayekhi, Kambis Bertsch, Thomas Akin, Ibrahim J Clin Med Article Data investigating the prognostic value of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and receptor blockers (ARB) usually focusses on patients presenting with heart failure (HF) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, by preventing adverse cardiac remodeling, ACEi/ARB may also decrease the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although ventricular tachyarrhythmias are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, only limited data are available focusing on the prognostic role of ACEi/ARB, when prescribed for secondary prevention of SCD. Therefore, this study comprehensively investigates the role of ACEi versus ARB in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. The primary prognostic outcome was all-cause mortality at three years, secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, ICD therapies and sudden cardiac death) and cardiac rehospitalization. A total of 1236 patients were included (15% treated with ARB and 85% with ACEi) and followed for a median of 4.0 years. At three years, ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term mortality (20% vs. 17%; log rank p = 0.287; HR = 0.965; 95% CI 0.689–1.351; p = 0.835) and comparable risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint (HR = 1.227; 95% CI 0.841–1.790; p = 0.288). In contrast, ACEi was associated with a decreased risk of cardiac rehospitalization at three years (HR = 0.690; 95% CI 0.490–0.971; p = 0.033). Within the propensity score matched cohort (i.e., 158 patients with ACEi and ARB), ACEi and ARB were associated with comparable long-term outcomes at three years. In conclusion, ACEi and ARB are associated with comparable risk of long-term outcomes in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. MDPI 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8910841/ /pubmed/35268553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051460 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schupp, Tobias
Behnes, Michael
Abumayyaleh, Mohammad
Weidner, Kathrin
Mashayekhi, Kambis
Bertsch, Thomas
Akin, Ibrahim
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
title Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
title_full Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
title_fullStr Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
title_full_unstemmed Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
title_short Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors versus Receptor Blockers in Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias
title_sort angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors versus receptor blockers in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051460
work_keys_str_mv AT schupptobias angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias
AT behnesmichael angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias
AT abumayyalehmohammad angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias
AT weidnerkathrin angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias
AT mashayekhikambis angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias
AT bertschthomas angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias
AT akinibrahim angiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorsversusreceptorblockersinpatientswithventriculartachyarrhythmias