Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting

3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomaniak, Mariusz, Neleman, Tara, Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek, Masdjedi, Kaneshka, van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C., Kochman, Janusz, den Dekker, Wijnand K., Wilschut, Jeroen M., Diletti, Roberto, Kardys, Isabella, Zijlstra, Felix, Van Mieghem, Nicolas M., Daemen, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051397
_version_ 1784666605456719872
author Tomaniak, Mariusz
Neleman, Tara
Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C.
Kochman, Janusz
den Dekker, Wijnand K.
Wilschut, Jeroen M.
Diletti, Roberto
Kardys, Isabella
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Daemen, Joost
author_facet Tomaniak, Mariusz
Neleman, Tara
Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C.
Kochman, Janusz
den Dekker, Wijnand K.
Wilschut, Jeroen M.
Diletti, Roberto
Kardys, Isabella
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Daemen, Joost
author_sort Tomaniak, Mariusz
collection PubMed
description 3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pre-PCI vFFR virtual stenting analysis (residual vFFR) with post-PCI FFR as a reference. This is an observational, single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients from the FFR-SEARCH registry. We blindly calculated residual vFFR from pre-PCI angiograms and compared them to invasive pressure-wire based post-PCI FFR. Inclusion criteria involved presentation with either stable or unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ≥1 significant stenosis in one of the epicardial coronary arteries (percentage diameter stenosis of >70% by QCA or hemodynamically relevant stenosis with FFR ≤0.80) and pre procedural angiograms eligible for vFFR analysis. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary bypass grafts, cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability. Eighty-one pre-PCI residual vFFR measurements were compared to post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR measurements. Mean residual vFFR was 0.91 ± 0.06, mean post-PCI FFR 0.91 ± 0.06 and mean post-PCI vFFR was 0.92 ± 0.05. Residual vFFR showed a high linear correlation (r = 0.84) and good agreement (mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.005 (−0.002–0.012)) with post-PCI FFR, as well as with post-PCI-vFFR (r = 0.77, mean difference −0.007 (−0.015–0.0003)). Residual vFFR showed good accuracy in the identification of lesions with post-PCI FFR < 0.90 (sensitivity 94%, specificity 71%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.99), p < 0.001). Virtual stenting using vFFR provided an accurate estimation of post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR. Further studies are needed to prospectively validate a vFFR-guided PCI strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8910880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89108802022-03-11 Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting Tomaniak, Mariusz Neleman, Tara Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek Masdjedi, Kaneshka van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C. Kochman, Janusz den Dekker, Wijnand K. Wilschut, Jeroen M. Diletti, Roberto Kardys, Isabella Zijlstra, Felix Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Daemen, Joost J Clin Med Article 3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pre-PCI vFFR virtual stenting analysis (residual vFFR) with post-PCI FFR as a reference. This is an observational, single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients from the FFR-SEARCH registry. We blindly calculated residual vFFR from pre-PCI angiograms and compared them to invasive pressure-wire based post-PCI FFR. Inclusion criteria involved presentation with either stable or unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ≥1 significant stenosis in one of the epicardial coronary arteries (percentage diameter stenosis of >70% by QCA or hemodynamically relevant stenosis with FFR ≤0.80) and pre procedural angiograms eligible for vFFR analysis. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary bypass grafts, cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability. Eighty-one pre-PCI residual vFFR measurements were compared to post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR measurements. Mean residual vFFR was 0.91 ± 0.06, mean post-PCI FFR 0.91 ± 0.06 and mean post-PCI vFFR was 0.92 ± 0.05. Residual vFFR showed a high linear correlation (r = 0.84) and good agreement (mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.005 (−0.002–0.012)) with post-PCI FFR, as well as with post-PCI-vFFR (r = 0.77, mean difference −0.007 (−0.015–0.0003)). Residual vFFR showed good accuracy in the identification of lesions with post-PCI FFR < 0.90 (sensitivity 94%, specificity 71%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.99), p < 0.001). Virtual stenting using vFFR provided an accurate estimation of post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR. Further studies are needed to prospectively validate a vFFR-guided PCI strategy. MDPI 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8910880/ /pubmed/35268488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051397 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tomaniak, Mariusz
Neleman, Tara
Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek
Masdjedi, Kaneshka
van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C.
Kochman, Janusz
den Dekker, Wijnand K.
Wilschut, Jeroen M.
Diletti, Roberto
Kardys, Isabella
Zijlstra, Felix
Van Mieghem, Nicolas M.
Daemen, Joost
Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vffr) virtual stenting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268488
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051397
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaniakmariusz diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT nelemantara diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT ziedsesdesplantesanniek diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT masdjedikaneshka diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT vanzandvoortlaurensjc diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT kochmanjanusz diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT dendekkerwijnandk diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT wilschutjeroenm diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT dilettiroberto diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT kardysisabella diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT zijlstrafelix diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT vanmieghemnicolasm diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting
AT daemenjoost diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting