Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting
3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051397 |
_version_ | 1784666605456719872 |
---|---|
author | Tomaniak, Mariusz Neleman, Tara Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek Masdjedi, Kaneshka van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C. Kochman, Janusz den Dekker, Wijnand K. Wilschut, Jeroen M. Diletti, Roberto Kardys, Isabella Zijlstra, Felix Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Daemen, Joost |
author_facet | Tomaniak, Mariusz Neleman, Tara Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek Masdjedi, Kaneshka van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C. Kochman, Janusz den Dekker, Wijnand K. Wilschut, Jeroen M. Diletti, Roberto Kardys, Isabella Zijlstra, Felix Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Daemen, Joost |
author_sort | Tomaniak, Mariusz |
collection | PubMed |
description | 3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pre-PCI vFFR virtual stenting analysis (residual vFFR) with post-PCI FFR as a reference. This is an observational, single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients from the FFR-SEARCH registry. We blindly calculated residual vFFR from pre-PCI angiograms and compared them to invasive pressure-wire based post-PCI FFR. Inclusion criteria involved presentation with either stable or unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ≥1 significant stenosis in one of the epicardial coronary arteries (percentage diameter stenosis of >70% by QCA or hemodynamically relevant stenosis with FFR ≤0.80) and pre procedural angiograms eligible for vFFR analysis. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary bypass grafts, cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability. Eighty-one pre-PCI residual vFFR measurements were compared to post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR measurements. Mean residual vFFR was 0.91 ± 0.06, mean post-PCI FFR 0.91 ± 0.06 and mean post-PCI vFFR was 0.92 ± 0.05. Residual vFFR showed a high linear correlation (r = 0.84) and good agreement (mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.005 (−0.002–0.012)) with post-PCI FFR, as well as with post-PCI-vFFR (r = 0.77, mean difference −0.007 (−0.015–0.0003)). Residual vFFR showed good accuracy in the identification of lesions with post-PCI FFR < 0.90 (sensitivity 94%, specificity 71%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.99), p < 0.001). Virtual stenting using vFFR provided an accurate estimation of post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR. Further studies are needed to prospectively validate a vFFR-guided PCI strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8910880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89108802022-03-11 Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting Tomaniak, Mariusz Neleman, Tara Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek Masdjedi, Kaneshka van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C. Kochman, Janusz den Dekker, Wijnand K. Wilschut, Jeroen M. Diletti, Roberto Kardys, Isabella Zijlstra, Felix Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Daemen, Joost J Clin Med Article 3D coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) proved to be an accurate diagnostic alternative to invasively measured pressure wire based fractional flow reserve (FFR). The ability to compute post-PCI vFFR using pre-PCI vFFR virtual stent analysis is unknown. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of pre-PCI vFFR virtual stenting analysis (residual vFFR) with post-PCI FFR as a reference. This is an observational, single-center retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients from the FFR-SEARCH registry. We blindly calculated residual vFFR from pre-PCI angiograms and compared them to invasive pressure-wire based post-PCI FFR. Inclusion criteria involved presentation with either stable or unstable angina or non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ≥1 significant stenosis in one of the epicardial coronary arteries (percentage diameter stenosis of >70% by QCA or hemodynamically relevant stenosis with FFR ≤0.80) and pre procedural angiograms eligible for vFFR analysis. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary bypass grafts, cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability. Eighty-one pre-PCI residual vFFR measurements were compared to post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR measurements. Mean residual vFFR was 0.91 ± 0.06, mean post-PCI FFR 0.91 ± 0.06 and mean post-PCI vFFR was 0.92 ± 0.05. Residual vFFR showed a high linear correlation (r = 0.84) and good agreement (mean difference (95% confidence interval): 0.005 (−0.002–0.012)) with post-PCI FFR, as well as with post-PCI-vFFR (r = 0.77, mean difference −0.007 (−0.015–0.0003)). Residual vFFR showed good accuracy in the identification of lesions with post-PCI FFR < 0.90 (sensitivity 94%, specificity 71%, area under the curve (AUC) 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.99), p < 0.001). Virtual stenting using vFFR provided an accurate estimation of post-PCI FFR and post-PCI vFFR. Further studies are needed to prospectively validate a vFFR-guided PCI strategy. MDPI 2022-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8910880/ /pubmed/35268488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051397 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tomaniak, Mariusz Neleman, Tara Ziedses des Plantes, Anniek Masdjedi, Kaneshka van Zandvoort, Laurens J. C. Kochman, Janusz den Dekker, Wijnand K. Wilschut, Jeroen M. Diletti, Roberto Kardys, Isabella Zijlstra, Felix Van Mieghem, Nicolas M. Daemen, Joost Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography-based vessel fractional flow reserve (vffr) virtual stenting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268488 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051397 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomaniakmariusz diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT nelemantara diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT ziedsesdesplantesanniek diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT masdjedikaneshka diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT vanzandvoortlaurensjc diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT kochmanjanusz diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT dendekkerwijnandk diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT wilschutjeroenm diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT dilettiroberto diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT kardysisabella diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT zijlstrafelix diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT vanmieghemnicolasm diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting AT daemenjoost diagnosticaccuracyofcoronaryangiographybasedvesselfractionalflowreservevffrvirtualstenting |