Cargando…

Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws

Objective: percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been widely used in minimally invasive spine stabilization. Triggered electromyogram (TrEMG) monitoring is performed to prevent PPS misplacement, but is not widely accepted. We have newly developed an insulating tap device to minimize the misp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Futakawa, Hayato, Nogami, Shigeharu, Seki, Shoji, Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu, Nakano, Masato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268288
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051197
_version_ 1784666619439480832
author Futakawa, Hayato
Nogami, Shigeharu
Seki, Shoji
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Nakano, Masato
author_facet Futakawa, Hayato
Nogami, Shigeharu
Seki, Shoji
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Nakano, Masato
author_sort Futakawa, Hayato
collection PubMed
description Objective: percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been widely used in minimally invasive spine stabilization. Triggered electromyogram (TrEMG) monitoring is performed to prevent PPS misplacement, but is not widely accepted. We have newly developed an insulating tap device to minimize the misplacement of PPS. Methods: TrEMG was measurable in insulation tap devices in 31 cases, and in non-insulating tap devices in 27 cases. Fluoroscopy was used to insert 194 PPS and 154 PPS, respectively. Based on the Rampersaud classification of postoperative computed tomography, we classified PPS insertion into four categories (Grade A as no violation, Grade D as more than 4 mm perforation). Results: Grade A was noted in 168 PPSs (86.6%) and Grade B to D in 26 PPSs in the insulation tap device group, and Grade A was noted in 129 PPSs (83.8%) and Grade B to D in 25 PPSs in the non-insulating tap device group, respectively. At a cutoff value of 11 mA, the sensitivity was 41.4% and the specificity was 98.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of the non-insulating tap device were 4.0% and 99.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The insulation treatment of the tap device has improved the sensitivity of TrEMG. TrEMG using the insulating tap device is one of the methods for safe PPS insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8910926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89109262022-03-11 Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws Futakawa, Hayato Nogami, Shigeharu Seki, Shoji Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu Nakano, Masato J Clin Med Article Objective: percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been widely used in minimally invasive spine stabilization. Triggered electromyogram (TrEMG) monitoring is performed to prevent PPS misplacement, but is not widely accepted. We have newly developed an insulating tap device to minimize the misplacement of PPS. Methods: TrEMG was measurable in insulation tap devices in 31 cases, and in non-insulating tap devices in 27 cases. Fluoroscopy was used to insert 194 PPS and 154 PPS, respectively. Based on the Rampersaud classification of postoperative computed tomography, we classified PPS insertion into four categories (Grade A as no violation, Grade D as more than 4 mm perforation). Results: Grade A was noted in 168 PPSs (86.6%) and Grade B to D in 26 PPSs in the insulation tap device group, and Grade A was noted in 129 PPSs (83.8%) and Grade B to D in 25 PPSs in the non-insulating tap device group, respectively. At a cutoff value of 11 mA, the sensitivity was 41.4% and the specificity was 98.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of the non-insulating tap device were 4.0% and 99.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The insulation treatment of the tap device has improved the sensitivity of TrEMG. TrEMG using the insulating tap device is one of the methods for safe PPS insertion. MDPI 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8910926/ /pubmed/35268288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051197 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Futakawa, Hayato
Nogami, Shigeharu
Seki, Shoji
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Nakano, Masato
Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws
title Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws
title_full Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws
title_fullStr Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws
title_short Evaluation of Triggered Electromyogram Monitoring during Insertion of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws
title_sort evaluation of triggered electromyogram monitoring during insertion of percutaneous pedicle screws
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8910926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268288
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051197
work_keys_str_mv AT futakawahayato evaluationoftriggeredelectromyogrammonitoringduringinsertionofpercutaneouspediclescrews
AT nogamishigeharu evaluationoftriggeredelectromyogrammonitoringduringinsertionofpercutaneouspediclescrews
AT sekishoji evaluationoftriggeredelectromyogrammonitoringduringinsertionofpercutaneouspediclescrews
AT kawaguchiyoshiharu evaluationoftriggeredelectromyogrammonitoringduringinsertionofpercutaneouspediclescrews
AT nakanomasato evaluationoftriggeredelectromyogrammonitoringduringinsertionofpercutaneouspediclescrews