Cargando…

The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients in hospital have diabetes, with most of them cared for by non-specialist staff. The effect of diabetes education for staff on patient outcomes, as well as the most effective method of staff education is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piya, Milan K., Fletcher, Therese, Myint, Kyaw P., Zarora, Reetu, Yu, Dahai, Simmons, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00975-y
_version_ 1784666698351116288
author Piya, Milan K.
Fletcher, Therese
Myint, Kyaw P.
Zarora, Reetu
Yu, Dahai
Simmons, David
author_facet Piya, Milan K.
Fletcher, Therese
Myint, Kyaw P.
Zarora, Reetu
Yu, Dahai
Simmons, David
author_sort Piya, Milan K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients in hospital have diabetes, with most of them cared for by non-specialist staff. The effect of diabetes education for staff on patient outcomes, as well as the most effective method of staff education is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare diabetes outcomes in medical wards where nursing staff were offered one face-to-face (F2F) session followed by access to online education (online), F2F education only, or standard care (control). METHODS: We conducted a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial involving 16-weeks baseline/rollout followed by a 28-week post-intervention period across three medical wards (clusters) in a Sydney Teaching Hospital. The online ward provided an online competency-based diabetes education program and 1-h F2F teaching from a diabetes nurse educator (DNE), the F2F ward provided four separate 1-h teaching sessions by a DNE, with no additional sessions in the control ward. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included good diabetes days (GDD), hypoglycaemia and medication errors. Poisson and binary logistic regression were used to compare clusters. RESULTS: Staff attendance/completion of ≥ 2 topics was greater with online than F2F education [39/48 (81%) vs 10/33 (30%); p < 0.001]. Among the 827/881 patients, there was no difference in LOS change between online [Median(IQR) 5(2–8) to 4(2–7) days], F2F [7(4–14) to 5(3–13) days] or control wards [5(3–9) to 5(3–7) days]. GDD improved only in the online ward 4.7(2.7–7.0) to 6.0(2.3–7.0) days; p = 0.038. Total patients with hypoglycaemia and appropriately treated hypoglycaemia increased in the online ward. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of online education increased diabetes training uptake among nursing staff. GDD and appropriate hypoglycaemia management increased in the online education wards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 24/05/2017: ACTRN12617000762358. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-00975-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8911103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89111032022-03-11 The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial Piya, Milan K. Fletcher, Therese Myint, Kyaw P. Zarora, Reetu Yu, Dahai Simmons, David BMC Endocr Disord Research BACKGROUND: An increasing number of patients in hospital have diabetes, with most of them cared for by non-specialist staff. The effect of diabetes education for staff on patient outcomes, as well as the most effective method of staff education is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare diabetes outcomes in medical wards where nursing staff were offered one face-to-face (F2F) session followed by access to online education (online), F2F education only, or standard care (control). METHODS: We conducted a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial involving 16-weeks baseline/rollout followed by a 28-week post-intervention period across three medical wards (clusters) in a Sydney Teaching Hospital. The online ward provided an online competency-based diabetes education program and 1-h F2F teaching from a diabetes nurse educator (DNE), the F2F ward provided four separate 1-h teaching sessions by a DNE, with no additional sessions in the control ward. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included good diabetes days (GDD), hypoglycaemia and medication errors. Poisson and binary logistic regression were used to compare clusters. RESULTS: Staff attendance/completion of ≥ 2 topics was greater with online than F2F education [39/48 (81%) vs 10/33 (30%); p < 0.001]. Among the 827/881 patients, there was no difference in LOS change between online [Median(IQR) 5(2–8) to 4(2–7) days], F2F [7(4–14) to 5(3–13) days] or control wards [5(3–9) to 5(3–7) days]. GDD improved only in the online ward 4.7(2.7–7.0) to 6.0(2.3–7.0) days; p = 0.038. Total patients with hypoglycaemia and appropriately treated hypoglycaemia increased in the online ward. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of online education increased diabetes training uptake among nursing staff. GDD and appropriate hypoglycaemia management increased in the online education wards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on 24/05/2017: ACTRN12617000762358. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-00975-y. BioMed Central 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8911103/ /pubmed/35272649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00975-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Piya, Milan K.
Fletcher, Therese
Myint, Kyaw P.
Zarora, Reetu
Yu, Dahai
Simmons, David
The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short The impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort impact of nursing staff education on diabetes inpatient glucose management: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-00975-y
work_keys_str_mv AT piyamilank theimpactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fletchertherese theimpactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT myintkyawp theimpactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zarorareetu theimpactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yudahai theimpactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simmonsdavid theimpactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT piyamilank impactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fletchertherese impactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT myintkyawp impactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zarorareetu impactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yudahai impactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT simmonsdavid impactofnursingstaffeducationondiabetesinpatientglucosemanagementapilotclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial