Cargando…

Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective

The mechanical behavior of the rockfill materials (RFMs) used in a dam’s shell must be evaluated for the safe and cost-effective design of embankment dams. However, the characterization of RFMs with specific reference to shear strength is challenging and costly, as the materials may contain particle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Mahmood, Al-Mansob, Ramez A., Jamil, Irfan, Al-Zubi, Mohammad A., Sabri, Mohanad Muayad Sabri, Alguno, Arnold C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051739
_version_ 1784666742894624768
author Ahmad, Mahmood
Al-Mansob, Ramez A.
Jamil, Irfan
Al-Zubi, Mohammad A.
Sabri, Mohanad Muayad Sabri
Alguno, Arnold C.
author_facet Ahmad, Mahmood
Al-Mansob, Ramez A.
Jamil, Irfan
Al-Zubi, Mohammad A.
Sabri, Mohanad Muayad Sabri
Alguno, Arnold C.
author_sort Ahmad, Mahmood
collection PubMed
description The mechanical behavior of the rockfill materials (RFMs) used in a dam’s shell must be evaluated for the safe and cost-effective design of embankment dams. However, the characterization of RFMs with specific reference to shear strength is challenging and costly, as the materials may contain particles larger than 500 mm in diameter. This study explores the potential of various kernel function-based Gaussian process regression (GPR) models to predict the shear strength of RFMs. A total of 165 datasets compiled from the literature were selected to train and test the proposed models. Comparing the developed models based on the GPR method shows that the superlative model was the Pearson universal kernel (PUK) model with an R-squared (R(2)) of 0.9806, a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9903, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0646 MPa, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0965 MPa, a relative absolute error (RAE) of 13.0776%, and a root relative squared error (RRSE) of 14.6311% in the training phase, while it performed equally well in the testing phase, with R(2) = 0.9455, r = 0.9724, MAE = 0.1048 MPa, RMSE = 0.1443 MPa, RAE = 21.8554%, and RRSE = 23.6865%. The prediction results of the GPR-PUK model are found to be more accurate and are in good agreement with the actual shear strength of RFMs, thus verifying the feasibility and effectiveness of the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8911239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89112392022-03-11 Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective Ahmad, Mahmood Al-Mansob, Ramez A. Jamil, Irfan Al-Zubi, Mohammad A. Sabri, Mohanad Muayad Sabri Alguno, Arnold C. Materials (Basel) Article The mechanical behavior of the rockfill materials (RFMs) used in a dam’s shell must be evaluated for the safe and cost-effective design of embankment dams. However, the characterization of RFMs with specific reference to shear strength is challenging and costly, as the materials may contain particles larger than 500 mm in diameter. This study explores the potential of various kernel function-based Gaussian process regression (GPR) models to predict the shear strength of RFMs. A total of 165 datasets compiled from the literature were selected to train and test the proposed models. Comparing the developed models based on the GPR method shows that the superlative model was the Pearson universal kernel (PUK) model with an R-squared (R(2)) of 0.9806, a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9903, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0646 MPa, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0965 MPa, a relative absolute error (RAE) of 13.0776%, and a root relative squared error (RRSE) of 14.6311% in the training phase, while it performed equally well in the testing phase, with R(2) = 0.9455, r = 0.9724, MAE = 0.1048 MPa, RMSE = 0.1443 MPa, RAE = 21.8554%, and RRSE = 23.6865%. The prediction results of the GPR-PUK model are found to be more accurate and are in good agreement with the actual shear strength of RFMs, thus verifying the feasibility and effectiveness of the model. MDPI 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8911239/ /pubmed/35268965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051739 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ahmad, Mahmood
Al-Mansob, Ramez A.
Jamil, Irfan
Al-Zubi, Mohammad A.
Sabri, Mohanad Muayad Sabri
Alguno, Arnold C.
Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective
title Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective
title_full Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective
title_fullStr Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective
title_short Prediction of Rockfill Materials’ Shear Strength Using Various Kernel Function-Based Regression Models—A Comparative Perspective
title_sort prediction of rockfill materials’ shear strength using various kernel function-based regression models—a comparative perspective
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051739
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmahmood predictionofrockfillmaterialsshearstrengthusingvariouskernelfunctionbasedregressionmodelsacomparativeperspective
AT almansobrameza predictionofrockfillmaterialsshearstrengthusingvariouskernelfunctionbasedregressionmodelsacomparativeperspective
AT jamilirfan predictionofrockfillmaterialsshearstrengthusingvariouskernelfunctionbasedregressionmodelsacomparativeperspective
AT alzubimohammada predictionofrockfillmaterialsshearstrengthusingvariouskernelfunctionbasedregressionmodelsacomparativeperspective
AT sabrimohanadmuayadsabri predictionofrockfillmaterialsshearstrengthusingvariouskernelfunctionbasedregressionmodelsacomparativeperspective
AT algunoarnoldc predictionofrockfillmaterialsshearstrengthusingvariouskernelfunctionbasedregressionmodelsacomparativeperspective