Cargando…

Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook

Presently, breast cancer diagnostic methods are dominated by mammography. Although drawbacks of mammography are present including ionizing radiation and patient discomfort, not many alternatives are available. Ultrasound (US) is another method used in the diagnosis of breast cancer, commonly perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kratkiewicz, Karl, Pattyn, Alexander, Alijabbari, Naser, Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051165
_version_ 1784666799220981760
author Kratkiewicz, Karl
Pattyn, Alexander
Alijabbari, Naser
Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
author_facet Kratkiewicz, Karl
Pattyn, Alexander
Alijabbari, Naser
Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
author_sort Kratkiewicz, Karl
collection PubMed
description Presently, breast cancer diagnostic methods are dominated by mammography. Although drawbacks of mammography are present including ionizing radiation and patient discomfort, not many alternatives are available. Ultrasound (US) is another method used in the diagnosis of breast cancer, commonly performed on women with dense breasts or in differentiating cysts from solid tumors. Handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) are presently used to generate reflection images which do not contain quantitative information about the tissue. This limitation leads to a subjective interpretation from the sonographer. To rectify the subjective nature of ultrasound, ultrasound tomography (UST) systems have been developed to acquire both reflection and transmission UST (TUST) images. This allows for quantitative assessment of tissue sound speed (SS) and acoustic attenuation which can be used to evaluate the stiffness of the lesions. Another imaging modality being used to detect breast cancer is photoacoustic tomography (PAT). Utilizing much of the same hardware as ultrasound tomography, PAT receives acoustic waves generated from tissue chromophores that are optically excited by a high energy pulsed laser. This allows the user to ideally produce chromophore concentration maps or extract other tissue parameters through spectroscopic PAT. Here, several systems in the area of TUST and PAT are discussed along with their advantages and disadvantages in breast cancer diagnosis. This overview of available systems can provide a landscape of possible intersections and future refinements in cancer diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8911419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89114192022-03-11 Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook Kratkiewicz, Karl Pattyn, Alexander Alijabbari, Naser Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad J Clin Med Review Presently, breast cancer diagnostic methods are dominated by mammography. Although drawbacks of mammography are present including ionizing radiation and patient discomfort, not many alternatives are available. Ultrasound (US) is another method used in the diagnosis of breast cancer, commonly performed on women with dense breasts or in differentiating cysts from solid tumors. Handheld ultrasound (HHUS) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) are presently used to generate reflection images which do not contain quantitative information about the tissue. This limitation leads to a subjective interpretation from the sonographer. To rectify the subjective nature of ultrasound, ultrasound tomography (UST) systems have been developed to acquire both reflection and transmission UST (TUST) images. This allows for quantitative assessment of tissue sound speed (SS) and acoustic attenuation which can be used to evaluate the stiffness of the lesions. Another imaging modality being used to detect breast cancer is photoacoustic tomography (PAT). Utilizing much of the same hardware as ultrasound tomography, PAT receives acoustic waves generated from tissue chromophores that are optically excited by a high energy pulsed laser. This allows the user to ideally produce chromophore concentration maps or extract other tissue parameters through spectroscopic PAT. Here, several systems in the area of TUST and PAT are discussed along with their advantages and disadvantages in breast cancer diagnosis. This overview of available systems can provide a landscape of possible intersections and future refinements in cancer diagnosis. MDPI 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8911419/ /pubmed/35268261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051165 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kratkiewicz, Karl
Pattyn, Alexander
Alijabbari, Naser
Mehrmohammadi, Mohammad
Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook
title Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook
title_full Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook
title_fullStr Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook
title_short Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Breast Cancer: Clinical Systems, Challenges, and Future Outlook
title_sort ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: clinical systems, challenges, and future outlook
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051165
work_keys_str_mv AT kratkiewiczkarl ultrasoundandphotoacousticimagingofbreastcancerclinicalsystemschallengesandfutureoutlook
AT pattynalexander ultrasoundandphotoacousticimagingofbreastcancerclinicalsystemschallengesandfutureoutlook
AT alijabbarinaser ultrasoundandphotoacousticimagingofbreastcancerclinicalsystemschallengesandfutureoutlook
AT mehrmohammadimohammad ultrasoundandphotoacousticimagingofbreastcancerclinicalsystemschallengesandfutureoutlook