Cargando…
Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review
Attachment systems (AS) enhance retention and stability by anchoring the overdentures to implants. Since 2002, the McGill consensus statement recommends the 2-implant-retained overdentures as the standard choice for edentulous mandible (2-IRMO). Considering the large number of AS available, it remai...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051933 |
_version_ | 1784666940454731776 |
---|---|
author | Wakam, Raphaël Benoit, Aurélie Mawussi, Kwamivi Bernardin Gorin, Caroline |
author_facet | Wakam, Raphaël Benoit, Aurélie Mawussi, Kwamivi Bernardin Gorin, Caroline |
author_sort | Wakam, Raphaël |
collection | PubMed |
description | Attachment systems (AS) enhance retention and stability by anchoring the overdentures to implants. Since 2002, the McGill consensus statement recommends the 2-implant-retained overdentures as the standard choice for edentulous mandible (2-IRMO). Considering the large number of AS available, it remains difficult for a practitioner to make a reasoned choice. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/Medline and carried out independently by three authors, on retention, wear, and maintenance of AS used clinically or in vitro specifically for 1- or 2-IRMO. The 45 selected studies include 14 clinical and 31 in vitro studies. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The initial retention force of the cylindrical system is higher than the ball system. The retention loss, related to the wear of the retention device, is responsible for the most common need of maintenance, requiring activation or replacement. Plastic retention devices wear out faster and more significantly than metal ones, implying a worse time behavior of cylindrical systems, but their maintenance rate is similar. Neither system appears categorically superior. Cylindrical systems provide higher initial retention than ball ones; this advantage reduces over time with wear without affecting their need for maintenance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8911844 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89118442022-03-11 Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review Wakam, Raphaël Benoit, Aurélie Mawussi, Kwamivi Bernardin Gorin, Caroline Materials (Basel) Systematic Review Attachment systems (AS) enhance retention and stability by anchoring the overdentures to implants. Since 2002, the McGill consensus statement recommends the 2-implant-retained overdentures as the standard choice for edentulous mandible (2-IRMO). Considering the large number of AS available, it remains difficult for a practitioner to make a reasoned choice. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/Medline and carried out independently by three authors, on retention, wear, and maintenance of AS used clinically or in vitro specifically for 1- or 2-IRMO. The 45 selected studies include 14 clinical and 31 in vitro studies. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). The initial retention force of the cylindrical system is higher than the ball system. The retention loss, related to the wear of the retention device, is responsible for the most common need of maintenance, requiring activation or replacement. Plastic retention devices wear out faster and more significantly than metal ones, implying a worse time behavior of cylindrical systems, but their maintenance rate is similar. Neither system appears categorically superior. Cylindrical systems provide higher initial retention than ball ones; this advantage reduces over time with wear without affecting their need for maintenance. MDPI 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8911844/ /pubmed/35269164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051933 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Wakam, Raphaël Benoit, Aurélie Mawussi, Kwamivi Bernardin Gorin, Caroline Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
title | Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | evaluation of retention, wear, and maintenance of attachment systems for single- or two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8911844/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35269164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15051933 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wakamraphael evaluationofretentionwearandmaintenanceofattachmentsystemsforsingleortwoimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesasystematicreview AT benoitaurelie evaluationofretentionwearandmaintenanceofattachmentsystemsforsingleortwoimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesasystematicreview AT mawussikwamivibernardin evaluationofretentionwearandmaintenanceofattachmentsystemsforsingleortwoimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesasystematicreview AT gorincaroline evaluationofretentionwearandmaintenanceofattachmentsystemsforsingleortwoimplantretainedmandibularoverdenturesasystematicreview |