Cargando…
A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are defined as any procedure releasing airborne particles <5 μm in size from the respiratory tract. There remains uncertainty about which dental procedures constitute AGPs. We quantified the aerosol number concentration generated during a range of periodontal,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265076 |
_version_ | 1784667066623590400 |
---|---|
author | Dudding, Tom Sheikh, Sadiyah Gregson, Florence Haworth, Jennifer Haworth, Simon Main, Barry G. Shrimpton, Andrew J. Hamilton, Fergus W. Ireland, Anthony J. Maskell, Nick A. Reid, Jonathan P. Bzdek, Bryan R. Gormley, Mark |
author_facet | Dudding, Tom Sheikh, Sadiyah Gregson, Florence Haworth, Jennifer Haworth, Simon Main, Barry G. Shrimpton, Andrew J. Hamilton, Fergus W. Ireland, Anthony J. Maskell, Nick A. Reid, Jonathan P. Bzdek, Bryan R. Gormley, Mark |
author_sort | Dudding, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are defined as any procedure releasing airborne particles <5 μm in size from the respiratory tract. There remains uncertainty about which dental procedures constitute AGPs. We quantified the aerosol number concentration generated during a range of periodontal, oral surgery and orthodontic procedures using an aerodynamic particle sizer, which measures aerosol number concentrations and size distribution across the 0.5–20 μm diameter size range. Measurements were conducted in an environment with a sufficiently low background to detect a patient’s cough, enabling confident identification of aerosol. Phantom head control experiments for each procedure were performed under the same conditions as a comparison. Where aerosol was detected during a patient procedure, we assessed whether the size distribution could be explained by the non-salivary contaminated instrument source in the respective phantom head control procedure using a two-sided unpaired t-test (comparing the mode widths (log(σ)) and peak positions (D(P,C))). The aerosol size distribution provided a robust fingerprint of aerosol emission from a source. 41 patients underwent fifteen different dental procedures. For nine procedures, no aerosol was detected above background. Where aerosol was detected, the percentage of procedure time that aerosol was observed above background ranged from 12.7% for ultrasonic scaling, to 42.9% for 3-in-1 air + water syringe. For ultrasonic scaling, 3-in-1 syringe use and surgical drilling, the aerosol size distribution matched the non-salivary contaminated instrument source, with no unexplained aerosol. High and slow speed drilling produced aerosol from patient procedures with different size distributions to those measured from the phantom head controls (mode widths log(σ)) and peaks (D(P,C), p< 0.002) and, therefore, may pose a greater risk of salivary contamination. This study provides evidence for sources of aerosol generation during common dental procedures, enabling more informed evaluation of risk and appropriate mitigation strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8912243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89122432022-03-11 A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures Dudding, Tom Sheikh, Sadiyah Gregson, Florence Haworth, Jennifer Haworth, Simon Main, Barry G. Shrimpton, Andrew J. Hamilton, Fergus W. Ireland, Anthony J. Maskell, Nick A. Reid, Jonathan P. Bzdek, Bryan R. Gormley, Mark PLoS One Research Article Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are defined as any procedure releasing airborne particles <5 μm in size from the respiratory tract. There remains uncertainty about which dental procedures constitute AGPs. We quantified the aerosol number concentration generated during a range of periodontal, oral surgery and orthodontic procedures using an aerodynamic particle sizer, which measures aerosol number concentrations and size distribution across the 0.5–20 μm diameter size range. Measurements were conducted in an environment with a sufficiently low background to detect a patient’s cough, enabling confident identification of aerosol. Phantom head control experiments for each procedure were performed under the same conditions as a comparison. Where aerosol was detected during a patient procedure, we assessed whether the size distribution could be explained by the non-salivary contaminated instrument source in the respective phantom head control procedure using a two-sided unpaired t-test (comparing the mode widths (log(σ)) and peak positions (D(P,C))). The aerosol size distribution provided a robust fingerprint of aerosol emission from a source. 41 patients underwent fifteen different dental procedures. For nine procedures, no aerosol was detected above background. Where aerosol was detected, the percentage of procedure time that aerosol was observed above background ranged from 12.7% for ultrasonic scaling, to 42.9% for 3-in-1 air + water syringe. For ultrasonic scaling, 3-in-1 syringe use and surgical drilling, the aerosol size distribution matched the non-salivary contaminated instrument source, with no unexplained aerosol. High and slow speed drilling produced aerosol from patient procedures with different size distributions to those measured from the phantom head controls (mode widths log(σ)) and peaks (D(P,C), p< 0.002) and, therefore, may pose a greater risk of salivary contamination. This study provides evidence for sources of aerosol generation during common dental procedures, enabling more informed evaluation of risk and appropriate mitigation strategies. Public Library of Science 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8912243/ /pubmed/35271682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265076 Text en © 2022 Dudding et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dudding, Tom Sheikh, Sadiyah Gregson, Florence Haworth, Jennifer Haworth, Simon Main, Barry G. Shrimpton, Andrew J. Hamilton, Fergus W. Ireland, Anthony J. Maskell, Nick A. Reid, Jonathan P. Bzdek, Bryan R. Gormley, Mark A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
title | A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
title_full | A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
title_fullStr | A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
title_short | A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
title_sort | clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duddingtom aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT sheikhsadiyah aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT gregsonflorence aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT haworthjennifer aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT haworthsimon aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT mainbarryg aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT shrimptonandrewj aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT hamiltonfergusw aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT irelandanthonyj aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT maskellnicka aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT reidjonathanp aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT bzdekbryanr aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT gormleymark aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT duddingtom clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT sheikhsadiyah clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT gregsonflorence clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT haworthjennifer clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT haworthsimon clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT mainbarryg clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT shrimptonandrewj clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT hamiltonfergusw clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT irelandanthonyj clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT maskellnicka clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT reidjonathanp clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT bzdekbryanr clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures AT gormleymark clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures |