Cargando…

A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures

Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are defined as any procedure releasing airborne particles <5 μm in size from the respiratory tract. There remains uncertainty about which dental procedures constitute AGPs. We quantified the aerosol number concentration generated during a range of periodontal,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudding, Tom, Sheikh, Sadiyah, Gregson, Florence, Haworth, Jennifer, Haworth, Simon, Main, Barry G., Shrimpton, Andrew J., Hamilton, Fergus W., Ireland, Anthony J., Maskell, Nick A., Reid, Jonathan P., Bzdek, Bryan R., Gormley, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265076
_version_ 1784667066623590400
author Dudding, Tom
Sheikh, Sadiyah
Gregson, Florence
Haworth, Jennifer
Haworth, Simon
Main, Barry G.
Shrimpton, Andrew J.
Hamilton, Fergus W.
Ireland, Anthony J.
Maskell, Nick A.
Reid, Jonathan P.
Bzdek, Bryan R.
Gormley, Mark
author_facet Dudding, Tom
Sheikh, Sadiyah
Gregson, Florence
Haworth, Jennifer
Haworth, Simon
Main, Barry G.
Shrimpton, Andrew J.
Hamilton, Fergus W.
Ireland, Anthony J.
Maskell, Nick A.
Reid, Jonathan P.
Bzdek, Bryan R.
Gormley, Mark
author_sort Dudding, Tom
collection PubMed
description Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are defined as any procedure releasing airborne particles <5 μm in size from the respiratory tract. There remains uncertainty about which dental procedures constitute AGPs. We quantified the aerosol number concentration generated during a range of periodontal, oral surgery and orthodontic procedures using an aerodynamic particle sizer, which measures aerosol number concentrations and size distribution across the 0.5–20 μm diameter size range. Measurements were conducted in an environment with a sufficiently low background to detect a patient’s cough, enabling confident identification of aerosol. Phantom head control experiments for each procedure were performed under the same conditions as a comparison. Where aerosol was detected during a patient procedure, we assessed whether the size distribution could be explained by the non-salivary contaminated instrument source in the respective phantom head control procedure using a two-sided unpaired t-test (comparing the mode widths (log(σ)) and peak positions (D(P,C))). The aerosol size distribution provided a robust fingerprint of aerosol emission from a source. 41 patients underwent fifteen different dental procedures. For nine procedures, no aerosol was detected above background. Where aerosol was detected, the percentage of procedure time that aerosol was observed above background ranged from 12.7% for ultrasonic scaling, to 42.9% for 3-in-1 air + water syringe. For ultrasonic scaling, 3-in-1 syringe use and surgical drilling, the aerosol size distribution matched the non-salivary contaminated instrument source, with no unexplained aerosol. High and slow speed drilling produced aerosol from patient procedures with different size distributions to those measured from the phantom head controls (mode widths log(σ)) and peaks (D(P,C), p< 0.002) and, therefore, may pose a greater risk of salivary contamination. This study provides evidence for sources of aerosol generation during common dental procedures, enabling more informed evaluation of risk and appropriate mitigation strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8912243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89122432022-03-11 A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures Dudding, Tom Sheikh, Sadiyah Gregson, Florence Haworth, Jennifer Haworth, Simon Main, Barry G. Shrimpton, Andrew J. Hamilton, Fergus W. Ireland, Anthony J. Maskell, Nick A. Reid, Jonathan P. Bzdek, Bryan R. Gormley, Mark PLoS One Research Article Aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are defined as any procedure releasing airborne particles <5 μm in size from the respiratory tract. There remains uncertainty about which dental procedures constitute AGPs. We quantified the aerosol number concentration generated during a range of periodontal, oral surgery and orthodontic procedures using an aerodynamic particle sizer, which measures aerosol number concentrations and size distribution across the 0.5–20 μm diameter size range. Measurements were conducted in an environment with a sufficiently low background to detect a patient’s cough, enabling confident identification of aerosol. Phantom head control experiments for each procedure were performed under the same conditions as a comparison. Where aerosol was detected during a patient procedure, we assessed whether the size distribution could be explained by the non-salivary contaminated instrument source in the respective phantom head control procedure using a two-sided unpaired t-test (comparing the mode widths (log(σ)) and peak positions (D(P,C))). The aerosol size distribution provided a robust fingerprint of aerosol emission from a source. 41 patients underwent fifteen different dental procedures. For nine procedures, no aerosol was detected above background. Where aerosol was detected, the percentage of procedure time that aerosol was observed above background ranged from 12.7% for ultrasonic scaling, to 42.9% for 3-in-1 air + water syringe. For ultrasonic scaling, 3-in-1 syringe use and surgical drilling, the aerosol size distribution matched the non-salivary contaminated instrument source, with no unexplained aerosol. High and slow speed drilling produced aerosol from patient procedures with different size distributions to those measured from the phantom head controls (mode widths log(σ)) and peaks (D(P,C), p< 0.002) and, therefore, may pose a greater risk of salivary contamination. This study provides evidence for sources of aerosol generation during common dental procedures, enabling more informed evaluation of risk and appropriate mitigation strategies. Public Library of Science 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8912243/ /pubmed/35271682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265076 Text en © 2022 Dudding et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dudding, Tom
Sheikh, Sadiyah
Gregson, Florence
Haworth, Jennifer
Haworth, Simon
Main, Barry G.
Shrimpton, Andrew J.
Hamilton, Fergus W.
Ireland, Anthony J.
Maskell, Nick A.
Reid, Jonathan P.
Bzdek, Bryan R.
Gormley, Mark
A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
title A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
title_full A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
title_fullStr A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
title_full_unstemmed A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
title_short A clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
title_sort clinical observational analysis of aerosol emissions from dental procedures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265076
work_keys_str_mv AT duddingtom aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT sheikhsadiyah aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT gregsonflorence aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT haworthjennifer aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT haworthsimon aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT mainbarryg aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT shrimptonandrewj aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT hamiltonfergusw aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT irelandanthonyj aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT maskellnicka aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT reidjonathanp aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT bzdekbryanr aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT gormleymark aclinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT duddingtom clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT sheikhsadiyah clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT gregsonflorence clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT haworthjennifer clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT haworthsimon clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT mainbarryg clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT shrimptonandrewj clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT hamiltonfergusw clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT irelandanthonyj clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT maskellnicka clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT reidjonathanp clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT bzdekbryanr clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures
AT gormleymark clinicalobservationalanalysisofaerosolemissionsfromdentalprocedures