Cargando…
Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
The long-term implementation of crop rotation and tillage has an impact on the soil environment through inputs and soil disturbance, which in turn has an impact on soil quality. Tillage has a long-term impact on the agroecosystems. Since 1999, a long-term field experiment has been carried out at the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11050614 |
_version_ | 1784667173771280384 |
---|---|
author | Steponavičienė, Vaida Bogužas, Vaclovas Sinkevičienė, Aušra Skinulienė, Lina Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas Sinkevičius, Alfredas |
author_facet | Steponavičienė, Vaida Bogužas, Vaclovas Sinkevičienė, Aušra Skinulienė, Lina Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas Sinkevičius, Alfredas |
author_sort | Steponavičienė, Vaida |
collection | PubMed |
description | The long-term implementation of crop rotation and tillage has an impact on the soil environment through inputs and soil disturbance, which in turn has an impact on soil quality. Tillage has a long-term impact on the agroecosystems. Since 1999, a long-term field experiment has been carried out at the Experimental Station of Vytautas Magnus University. The aim of this experiment is to investigate the effects of long-term various-intensity tillage and straw retention systems on soil physical properties. The results were obtained in 2013 and 2019 (spring rape was growing). According to the latest edition of the International Soil Classification System, the soil in the experimental field was classified as Endocalcaric Stagnosol (Aric, Drainic, Ruptic, and Amphisiltic). The treatments were arranged using a split-plot design. In a two-factor field experiment, the straw was removed from one part of the experimental field, and the entire straw yield was chopped and spread at harvest in the other part of the field (Factor A). There were three different tillage systems as a subplot (conventional deep ploughing, cover cropping with following shallow termination, and no-tillage) (Factor B). There were four replications. The long-term application of reduced tillage significantly increased soil water retention and improved the pore structure and CO(2) emissions. Irrespective of the incorporation of straw, it was found that as the amount of water available to plants increases, CO(2) emissions from the soil increase to some extent and then start to decrease. Simplified tillage and no-tillage in uncultivated soil reduce CO(2) emissions by increasing the amount of water available to plants from 0.151 to 0.233 m(3)·m(−3). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8912575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89125752022-03-11 Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention Steponavičienė, Vaida Bogužas, Vaclovas Sinkevičienė, Aušra Skinulienė, Lina Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas Sinkevičius, Alfredas Plants (Basel) Article The long-term implementation of crop rotation and tillage has an impact on the soil environment through inputs and soil disturbance, which in turn has an impact on soil quality. Tillage has a long-term impact on the agroecosystems. Since 1999, a long-term field experiment has been carried out at the Experimental Station of Vytautas Magnus University. The aim of this experiment is to investigate the effects of long-term various-intensity tillage and straw retention systems on soil physical properties. The results were obtained in 2013 and 2019 (spring rape was growing). According to the latest edition of the International Soil Classification System, the soil in the experimental field was classified as Endocalcaric Stagnosol (Aric, Drainic, Ruptic, and Amphisiltic). The treatments were arranged using a split-plot design. In a two-factor field experiment, the straw was removed from one part of the experimental field, and the entire straw yield was chopped and spread at harvest in the other part of the field (Factor A). There were three different tillage systems as a subplot (conventional deep ploughing, cover cropping with following shallow termination, and no-tillage) (Factor B). There were four replications. The long-term application of reduced tillage significantly increased soil water retention and improved the pore structure and CO(2) emissions. Irrespective of the incorporation of straw, it was found that as the amount of water available to plants increases, CO(2) emissions from the soil increase to some extent and then start to decrease. Simplified tillage and no-tillage in uncultivated soil reduce CO(2) emissions by increasing the amount of water available to plants from 0.151 to 0.233 m(3)·m(−3). MDPI 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8912575/ /pubmed/35270083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11050614 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Steponavičienė, Vaida Bogužas, Vaclovas Sinkevičienė, Aušra Skinulienė, Lina Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas Sinkevičius, Alfredas Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention |
title | Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention |
title_full | Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention |
title_fullStr | Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention |
title_full_unstemmed | Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention |
title_short | Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention |
title_sort | soil water capacity, pore size distribution, and co(2) emission in different soil tillage systems and straw retention |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11050614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steponavicienevaida soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention AT boguzasvaclovas soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention AT sinkevicieneausra soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention AT skinulienelina soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention AT vaisvalaviciusrimantas soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention AT sinkeviciusalfredas soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention |