Cargando…

Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention

The long-term implementation of crop rotation and tillage has an impact on the soil environment through inputs and soil disturbance, which in turn has an impact on soil quality. Tillage has a long-term impact on the agroecosystems. Since 1999, a long-term field experiment has been carried out at the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steponavičienė, Vaida, Bogužas, Vaclovas, Sinkevičienė, Aušra, Skinulienė, Lina, Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas, Sinkevičius, Alfredas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11050614
_version_ 1784667173771280384
author Steponavičienė, Vaida
Bogužas, Vaclovas
Sinkevičienė, Aušra
Skinulienė, Lina
Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas
Sinkevičius, Alfredas
author_facet Steponavičienė, Vaida
Bogužas, Vaclovas
Sinkevičienė, Aušra
Skinulienė, Lina
Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas
Sinkevičius, Alfredas
author_sort Steponavičienė, Vaida
collection PubMed
description The long-term implementation of crop rotation and tillage has an impact on the soil environment through inputs and soil disturbance, which in turn has an impact on soil quality. Tillage has a long-term impact on the agroecosystems. Since 1999, a long-term field experiment has been carried out at the Experimental Station of Vytautas Magnus University. The aim of this experiment is to investigate the effects of long-term various-intensity tillage and straw retention systems on soil physical properties. The results were obtained in 2013 and 2019 (spring rape was growing). According to the latest edition of the International Soil Classification System, the soil in the experimental field was classified as Endocalcaric Stagnosol (Aric, Drainic, Ruptic, and Amphisiltic). The treatments were arranged using a split-plot design. In a two-factor field experiment, the straw was removed from one part of the experimental field, and the entire straw yield was chopped and spread at harvest in the other part of the field (Factor A). There were three different tillage systems as a subplot (conventional deep ploughing, cover cropping with following shallow termination, and no-tillage) (Factor B). There were four replications. The long-term application of reduced tillage significantly increased soil water retention and improved the pore structure and CO(2) emissions. Irrespective of the incorporation of straw, it was found that as the amount of water available to plants increases, CO(2) emissions from the soil increase to some extent and then start to decrease. Simplified tillage and no-tillage in uncultivated soil reduce CO(2) emissions by increasing the amount of water available to plants from 0.151 to 0.233 m(3)·m(−3).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8912575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89125752022-03-11 Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention Steponavičienė, Vaida Bogužas, Vaclovas Sinkevičienė, Aušra Skinulienė, Lina Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas Sinkevičius, Alfredas Plants (Basel) Article The long-term implementation of crop rotation and tillage has an impact on the soil environment through inputs and soil disturbance, which in turn has an impact on soil quality. Tillage has a long-term impact on the agroecosystems. Since 1999, a long-term field experiment has been carried out at the Experimental Station of Vytautas Magnus University. The aim of this experiment is to investigate the effects of long-term various-intensity tillage and straw retention systems on soil physical properties. The results were obtained in 2013 and 2019 (spring rape was growing). According to the latest edition of the International Soil Classification System, the soil in the experimental field was classified as Endocalcaric Stagnosol (Aric, Drainic, Ruptic, and Amphisiltic). The treatments were arranged using a split-plot design. In a two-factor field experiment, the straw was removed from one part of the experimental field, and the entire straw yield was chopped and spread at harvest in the other part of the field (Factor A). There were three different tillage systems as a subplot (conventional deep ploughing, cover cropping with following shallow termination, and no-tillage) (Factor B). There were four replications. The long-term application of reduced tillage significantly increased soil water retention and improved the pore structure and CO(2) emissions. Irrespective of the incorporation of straw, it was found that as the amount of water available to plants increases, CO(2) emissions from the soil increase to some extent and then start to decrease. Simplified tillage and no-tillage in uncultivated soil reduce CO(2) emissions by increasing the amount of water available to plants from 0.151 to 0.233 m(3)·m(−3). MDPI 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8912575/ /pubmed/35270083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11050614 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Steponavičienė, Vaida
Bogužas, Vaclovas
Sinkevičienė, Aušra
Skinulienė, Lina
Vaisvalavičius, Rimantas
Sinkevičius, Alfredas
Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
title Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
title_full Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
title_fullStr Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
title_full_unstemmed Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
title_short Soil Water Capacity, Pore Size Distribution, and CO(2) Emission in Different Soil Tillage Systems and Straw Retention
title_sort soil water capacity, pore size distribution, and co(2) emission in different soil tillage systems and straw retention
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11050614
work_keys_str_mv AT steponavicienevaida soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention
AT boguzasvaclovas soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention
AT sinkevicieneausra soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention
AT skinulienelina soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention
AT vaisvalaviciusrimantas soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention
AT sinkeviciusalfredas soilwatercapacityporesizedistributionandco2emissionindifferentsoiltillagesystemsandstrawretention