Cargando…

The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVE: A single-institution cohort of 92 consecutive pediatric patients harboring tumors involving the fourth ventricle, surgically treated via the telovelar or transvermian approach, was retrospectively reviewed in order to analyze the impact of surgical route on surgery-related outcomes and cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Onorini, Nicola, Spennato, Pietro, Orlando, Valentina, Savoia, Fabio, Calì, Camilla, Russo, Carmela, De Martino, Lucia, de Santi, Maria Serena, Mirone, Giuseppe, Ruggiero, Claudio, Quaglietta, Lucia, Cinalli, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.821738
_version_ 1784667292772073472
author Onorini, Nicola
Spennato, Pietro
Orlando, Valentina
Savoia, Fabio
Calì, Camilla
Russo, Carmela
De Martino, Lucia
de Santi, Maria Serena
Mirone, Giuseppe
Ruggiero, Claudio
Quaglietta, Lucia
Cinalli, Giuseppe
author_facet Onorini, Nicola
Spennato, Pietro
Orlando, Valentina
Savoia, Fabio
Calì, Camilla
Russo, Carmela
De Martino, Lucia
de Santi, Maria Serena
Mirone, Giuseppe
Ruggiero, Claudio
Quaglietta, Lucia
Cinalli, Giuseppe
author_sort Onorini, Nicola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A single-institution cohort of 92 consecutive pediatric patients harboring tumors involving the fourth ventricle, surgically treated via the telovelar or transvermian approach, was retrospectively reviewed in order to analyze the impact of surgical route on surgery-related outcomes and cumulative survival. METHODS: Clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathology details were retrospectively analyzed. We selected n = 6 surgery-related clinical and radiological outcomes: transient and permanent neurological deficits, duration of assisted ventilation, postoperative new onset medical events, postoperative cerebellar mutism, and extent of resection. We built univariate and multivariate logistic models to analyze the significance of relationships between the surgical routes and the outcomes. Cumulative survival (CS) was estimated by the cohort approach. RESULTS: There were 53 girls and 39 boys (mean age, 83 months). Telovelar approach was performed in 51 cases and transvermian approach in 41 cases. Early postoperative MRI studies showed complete removal in 57 cases (62%) and measurable residual tumor in 35 cases (38%). The average tumor residual volume was 1,316 cm(3) (range, 0.016–4.231 cm(3); median value, 0.9875 cm(3)). Residual disease was more often detected on immediate postop MRI after telovelar approach, but the difference was not significant. Cerebellar mutism was observed in 10 cases (11%). No significant difference in the onset of cerebellar mutism was detected between telovelar and transvermian approach. The choice of surgical approach did not significantly modify any other postoperative outcome and 1-/3-year CS of high-grade surgically treated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective series, our findings offer significant data to reconsider the real impact of the choice of the surgical route to the fourth ventricle on the incidence of cerebellar mutism and surgery-related morbidity. This seems to be in line with some recent reports in the literature. Surgical approach to the fourth ventricle should be individualized according to the location of the tumor, degree of vermian infiltration, and lateral and upward extension. Telovelar and transvermian approaches should not be considered alternative but complementary. Pediatric neurosurgeons should fully master both approaches and choose the one that they consider the best for the patient based on a thorough and careful evaluation of pre-operative imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8912940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89129402022-03-11 The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients Onorini, Nicola Spennato, Pietro Orlando, Valentina Savoia, Fabio Calì, Camilla Russo, Carmela De Martino, Lucia de Santi, Maria Serena Mirone, Giuseppe Ruggiero, Claudio Quaglietta, Lucia Cinalli, Giuseppe Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: A single-institution cohort of 92 consecutive pediatric patients harboring tumors involving the fourth ventricle, surgically treated via the telovelar or transvermian approach, was retrospectively reviewed in order to analyze the impact of surgical route on surgery-related outcomes and cumulative survival. METHODS: Clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathology details were retrospectively analyzed. We selected n = 6 surgery-related clinical and radiological outcomes: transient and permanent neurological deficits, duration of assisted ventilation, postoperative new onset medical events, postoperative cerebellar mutism, and extent of resection. We built univariate and multivariate logistic models to analyze the significance of relationships between the surgical routes and the outcomes. Cumulative survival (CS) was estimated by the cohort approach. RESULTS: There were 53 girls and 39 boys (mean age, 83 months). Telovelar approach was performed in 51 cases and transvermian approach in 41 cases. Early postoperative MRI studies showed complete removal in 57 cases (62%) and measurable residual tumor in 35 cases (38%). The average tumor residual volume was 1,316 cm(3) (range, 0.016–4.231 cm(3); median value, 0.9875 cm(3)). Residual disease was more often detected on immediate postop MRI after telovelar approach, but the difference was not significant. Cerebellar mutism was observed in 10 cases (11%). No significant difference in the onset of cerebellar mutism was detected between telovelar and transvermian approach. The choice of surgical approach did not significantly modify any other postoperative outcome and 1-/3-year CS of high-grade surgically treated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: With the limitation of a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective series, our findings offer significant data to reconsider the real impact of the choice of the surgical route to the fourth ventricle on the incidence of cerebellar mutism and surgery-related morbidity. This seems to be in line with some recent reports in the literature. Surgical approach to the fourth ventricle should be individualized according to the location of the tumor, degree of vermian infiltration, and lateral and upward extension. Telovelar and transvermian approaches should not be considered alternative but complementary. Pediatric neurosurgeons should fully master both approaches and choose the one that they consider the best for the patient based on a thorough and careful evaluation of pre-operative imaging. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8912940/ /pubmed/35280797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.821738 Text en Copyright © 2022 Onorini, Spennato, Orlando, Savoia, Calì, Russo, De Martino, de Santi, Mirone, Ruggiero, Quaglietta and Cinalli https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Onorini, Nicola
Spennato, Pietro
Orlando, Valentina
Savoia, Fabio
Calì, Camilla
Russo, Carmela
De Martino, Lucia
de Santi, Maria Serena
Mirone, Giuseppe
Ruggiero, Claudio
Quaglietta, Lucia
Cinalli, Giuseppe
The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients
title The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients
title_full The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients
title_fullStr The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients
title_short The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients
title_sort clinical and prognostic impact of the choice of surgical approach to fourth ventricular tumors in a single-center, single-surgeon cohort of 92 consecutive pediatric patients
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280797
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.821738
work_keys_str_mv AT onorininicola theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT spennatopietro theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT orlandovalentina theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT savoiafabio theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT calicamilla theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT russocarmela theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT demartinolucia theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT desantimariaserena theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT mironegiuseppe theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT ruggieroclaudio theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT quagliettalucia theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT cinalligiuseppe theclinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT onorininicola clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT spennatopietro clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT orlandovalentina clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT savoiafabio clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT calicamilla clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT russocarmela clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT demartinolucia clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT desantimariaserena clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT mironegiuseppe clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT ruggieroclaudio clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT quagliettalucia clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients
AT cinalligiuseppe clinicalandprognosticimpactofthechoiceofsurgicalapproachtofourthventriculartumorsinasinglecentersinglesurgeoncohortof92consecutivepediatricpatients