Cargando…
Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
BACKGROUND: It is well known that traditional smoking causes various types of cancer, leading to the current decline in traditional smoking among US adults from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly marketed as a safe alternative and gaining popularity esp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317331 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1438 |
_version_ | 1784667313800216576 |
---|---|
author | Chidharla, Anusha Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Rabbani, Rizwan Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Mehta, Deep Manaktala, Pritika S. Pillai, Shreejith Gupta, Sachin Koritala, Thoyaja |
author_facet | Chidharla, Anusha Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Rabbani, Rizwan Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Mehta, Deep Manaktala, Pritika S. Pillai, Shreejith Gupta, Sachin Koritala, Thoyaja |
author_sort | Chidharla, Anusha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is well known that traditional smoking causes various types of cancer, leading to the current decline in traditional smoking among US adults from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly marketed as a safe alternative and gaining popularity especially among never-smokers and adolescents. However, there is limited evidence of effects of e-cigarette on cancer. Hence, we aim to find the prevalence and association of e-cigarette and traditional smoking among cancer respondents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the NHANES database from 2015 to 2018. We assessed history of cancer (MCQ220), type of cancers (MCQ230a), and smoking status (e-cigarette: SMQ900 or SMQ905 and traditional smoking: SMQ020) using questionnaires. We performed multivariable logistic regression models to find the association of e-cigarette use, traditional smoking, and no smoking with cancer after adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 154,856 participants were included, of whom 5% were e-cigarette users, 31.4% were traditional smokers, and 63.6% were nonsmokers. There is a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use among younger participants, females (49 vs. 38) in comparison to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). The e-cigarette users have lower prevalence of cancer compared to traditional smoking (2.3% vs. 16.8%; P < 0.0001), but they were diagnosed with cancer at a younger age. Among cancer subtypes, cervical cancer (22 vs. 2.6), leukemia (8.5 vs. 1.1), skin cancer (non-melanoma) (15.6 vs. 12.3), skin (other) (28 vs. 10) and thyroid (10.6 vs. 2.4) had higher prevalence of e-cigarette use compared to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). Our regression analysis showed that e-cigarette users have 2.2 times higher risk of having cancer compared to non-smokers (odds ratio (OR): 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2 - 2.3; P < 0.0001). Similarly, traditional smokers have 1.96 higher odds of having cancer compared to nonsmokers (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.96 - 1.97; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, e-cigarette users had an early age of cancer onset and higher risk of cancer. Hence, this is stepping stone for future research to evaluate the safety and effects of e-cigarettes in patients with cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8913014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89130142022-03-21 Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study Chidharla, Anusha Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Rabbani, Rizwan Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Mehta, Deep Manaktala, Pritika S. Pillai, Shreejith Gupta, Sachin Koritala, Thoyaja World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: It is well known that traditional smoking causes various types of cancer, leading to the current decline in traditional smoking among US adults from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly marketed as a safe alternative and gaining popularity especially among never-smokers and adolescents. However, there is limited evidence of effects of e-cigarette on cancer. Hence, we aim to find the prevalence and association of e-cigarette and traditional smoking among cancer respondents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the NHANES database from 2015 to 2018. We assessed history of cancer (MCQ220), type of cancers (MCQ230a), and smoking status (e-cigarette: SMQ900 or SMQ905 and traditional smoking: SMQ020) using questionnaires. We performed multivariable logistic regression models to find the association of e-cigarette use, traditional smoking, and no smoking with cancer after adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 154,856 participants were included, of whom 5% were e-cigarette users, 31.4% were traditional smokers, and 63.6% were nonsmokers. There is a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use among younger participants, females (49 vs. 38) in comparison to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). The e-cigarette users have lower prevalence of cancer compared to traditional smoking (2.3% vs. 16.8%; P < 0.0001), but they were diagnosed with cancer at a younger age. Among cancer subtypes, cervical cancer (22 vs. 2.6), leukemia (8.5 vs. 1.1), skin cancer (non-melanoma) (15.6 vs. 12.3), skin (other) (28 vs. 10) and thyroid (10.6 vs. 2.4) had higher prevalence of e-cigarette use compared to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). Our regression analysis showed that e-cigarette users have 2.2 times higher risk of having cancer compared to non-smokers (odds ratio (OR): 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2 - 2.3; P < 0.0001). Similarly, traditional smokers have 1.96 higher odds of having cancer compared to nonsmokers (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.96 - 1.97; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, e-cigarette users had an early age of cancer onset and higher risk of cancer. Hence, this is stepping stone for future research to evaluate the safety and effects of e-cigarettes in patients with cancer. Elmer Press 2022-02 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8913014/ /pubmed/35317331 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1438 Text en Copyright 2022, Chidharla et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chidharla, Anusha Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Rabbani, Rizwan Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Mehta, Deep Manaktala, Pritika S. Pillai, Shreejith Gupta, Sachin Koritala, Thoyaja Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study |
title | Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study |
title_full | Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study |
title_fullStr | Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study |
title_short | Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study |
title_sort | cancer prevalence in e-cigarette users: a retrospective cross-sectional nhanes study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317331 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chidharlaanusha cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT agarwalkriti cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT abdelwahedsalwa cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT bhandarirenu cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT singhabhishek cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT rabbanirizwan cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT patelkajal cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT singhpriyanka cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT mehtadeep cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT manaktalapritikas cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT pillaishreejith cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT guptasachin cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy AT koritalathoyaja cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy |