Cargando…

Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study

BACKGROUND: It is well known that traditional smoking causes various types of cancer, leading to the current decline in traditional smoking among US adults from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly marketed as a safe alternative and gaining popularity esp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chidharla, Anusha, Agarwal, Kriti, Abdelwahed, Salwa, Bhandari, Renu, Singh, Abhishek, Rabbani, Rizwan, Patel, Kajal, Singh, Priyanka, Mehta, Deep, Manaktala, Pritika S., Pillai, Shreejith, Gupta, Sachin, Koritala, Thoyaja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317331
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1438
_version_ 1784667313800216576
author Chidharla, Anusha
Agarwal, Kriti
Abdelwahed, Salwa
Bhandari, Renu
Singh, Abhishek
Rabbani, Rizwan
Patel, Kajal
Singh, Priyanka
Mehta, Deep
Manaktala, Pritika S.
Pillai, Shreejith
Gupta, Sachin
Koritala, Thoyaja
author_facet Chidharla, Anusha
Agarwal, Kriti
Abdelwahed, Salwa
Bhandari, Renu
Singh, Abhishek
Rabbani, Rizwan
Patel, Kajal
Singh, Priyanka
Mehta, Deep
Manaktala, Pritika S.
Pillai, Shreejith
Gupta, Sachin
Koritala, Thoyaja
author_sort Chidharla, Anusha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well known that traditional smoking causes various types of cancer, leading to the current decline in traditional smoking among US adults from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly marketed as a safe alternative and gaining popularity especially among never-smokers and adolescents. However, there is limited evidence of effects of e-cigarette on cancer. Hence, we aim to find the prevalence and association of e-cigarette and traditional smoking among cancer respondents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the NHANES database from 2015 to 2018. We assessed history of cancer (MCQ220), type of cancers (MCQ230a), and smoking status (e-cigarette: SMQ900 or SMQ905 and traditional smoking: SMQ020) using questionnaires. We performed multivariable logistic regression models to find the association of e-cigarette use, traditional smoking, and no smoking with cancer after adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 154,856 participants were included, of whom 5% were e-cigarette users, 31.4% were traditional smokers, and 63.6% were nonsmokers. There is a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use among younger participants, females (49 vs. 38) in comparison to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). The e-cigarette users have lower prevalence of cancer compared to traditional smoking (2.3% vs. 16.8%; P < 0.0001), but they were diagnosed with cancer at a younger age. Among cancer subtypes, cervical cancer (22 vs. 2.6), leukemia (8.5 vs. 1.1), skin cancer (non-melanoma) (15.6 vs. 12.3), skin (other) (28 vs. 10) and thyroid (10.6 vs. 2.4) had higher prevalence of e-cigarette use compared to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). Our regression analysis showed that e-cigarette users have 2.2 times higher risk of having cancer compared to non-smokers (odds ratio (OR): 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2 - 2.3; P < 0.0001). Similarly, traditional smokers have 1.96 higher odds of having cancer compared to nonsmokers (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.96 - 1.97; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, e-cigarette users had an early age of cancer onset and higher risk of cancer. Hence, this is stepping stone for future research to evaluate the safety and effects of e-cigarettes in patients with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89130142022-03-21 Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study Chidharla, Anusha Agarwal, Kriti Abdelwahed, Salwa Bhandari, Renu Singh, Abhishek Rabbani, Rizwan Patel, Kajal Singh, Priyanka Mehta, Deep Manaktala, Pritika S. Pillai, Shreejith Gupta, Sachin Koritala, Thoyaja World J Oncol Original Article BACKGROUND: It is well known that traditional smoking causes various types of cancer, leading to the current decline in traditional smoking among US adults from 20.9% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2019. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are commonly marketed as a safe alternative and gaining popularity especially among never-smokers and adolescents. However, there is limited evidence of effects of e-cigarette on cancer. Hence, we aim to find the prevalence and association of e-cigarette and traditional smoking among cancer respondents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the NHANES database from 2015 to 2018. We assessed history of cancer (MCQ220), type of cancers (MCQ230a), and smoking status (e-cigarette: SMQ900 or SMQ905 and traditional smoking: SMQ020) using questionnaires. We performed multivariable logistic regression models to find the association of e-cigarette use, traditional smoking, and no smoking with cancer after adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 154,856 participants were included, of whom 5% were e-cigarette users, 31.4% were traditional smokers, and 63.6% were nonsmokers. There is a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use among younger participants, females (49 vs. 38) in comparison to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). The e-cigarette users have lower prevalence of cancer compared to traditional smoking (2.3% vs. 16.8%; P < 0.0001), but they were diagnosed with cancer at a younger age. Among cancer subtypes, cervical cancer (22 vs. 2.6), leukemia (8.5 vs. 1.1), skin cancer (non-melanoma) (15.6 vs. 12.3), skin (other) (28 vs. 10) and thyroid (10.6 vs. 2.4) had higher prevalence of e-cigarette use compared to traditional smokers (P < 0.0001). Our regression analysis showed that e-cigarette users have 2.2 times higher risk of having cancer compared to non-smokers (odds ratio (OR): 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2 - 2.3; P < 0.0001). Similarly, traditional smokers have 1.96 higher odds of having cancer compared to nonsmokers (OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.96 - 1.97; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In our study, e-cigarette users had an early age of cancer onset and higher risk of cancer. Hence, this is stepping stone for future research to evaluate the safety and effects of e-cigarettes in patients with cancer. Elmer Press 2022-02 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8913014/ /pubmed/35317331 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1438 Text en Copyright 2022, Chidharla et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chidharla, Anusha
Agarwal, Kriti
Abdelwahed, Salwa
Bhandari, Renu
Singh, Abhishek
Rabbani, Rizwan
Patel, Kajal
Singh, Priyanka
Mehta, Deep
Manaktala, Pritika S.
Pillai, Shreejith
Gupta, Sachin
Koritala, Thoyaja
Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
title Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
title_full Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
title_fullStr Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
title_full_unstemmed Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
title_short Cancer Prevalence in E-Cigarette Users: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional NHANES Study
title_sort cancer prevalence in e-cigarette users: a retrospective cross-sectional nhanes study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35317331
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjon1438
work_keys_str_mv AT chidharlaanusha cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT agarwalkriti cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT abdelwahedsalwa cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT bhandarirenu cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT singhabhishek cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT rabbanirizwan cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT patelkajal cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT singhpriyanka cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT mehtadeep cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT manaktalapritikas cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT pillaishreejith cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT guptasachin cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy
AT koritalathoyaja cancerprevalenceinecigaretteusersaretrospectivecrosssectionalnhanesstudy