Cargando…

Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems

The multifaceted long-term impairments resulting from critical illness and COVID-19 require interdisciplinary management approaches in the recovery phase of illness. Operational insights into the structure and process of recovery clinics (RCs) from heterogeneous health systems are needed. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danesh, Valerie, Boehm, Leanne M., Eaton, Tammy L., Arroliga, Alejandro C., Mayer, Kirby P., Kesler, Shelli R., Bakhru, Rita N., Baram, Michael, Bellinghausen, Amy L., Biehl, Michelle, Dangayach, Neha S., Goldstein, Nir M., Hoehn, K. Sarah, Islam, Marjan, Jagpal, Sugeet, Johnson, Annie B., Jolley, Sarah E., Kloos, Janet A., Mahoney, Eric J., Maley, Jason H., Martin, Sara F., McSparron, Jakob I., Mery, Marissa, Saft, Howard, Santhosh, Lekshmi, Schwab, Kristin, Villalba, Dario, Sevin, Carla M., Montgomery, Ashley A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000658
_version_ 1784667339233427456
author Danesh, Valerie
Boehm, Leanne M.
Eaton, Tammy L.
Arroliga, Alejandro C.
Mayer, Kirby P.
Kesler, Shelli R.
Bakhru, Rita N.
Baram, Michael
Bellinghausen, Amy L.
Biehl, Michelle
Dangayach, Neha S.
Goldstein, Nir M.
Hoehn, K. Sarah
Islam, Marjan
Jagpal, Sugeet
Johnson, Annie B.
Jolley, Sarah E.
Kloos, Janet A.
Mahoney, Eric J.
Maley, Jason H.
Martin, Sara F.
McSparron, Jakob I.
Mery, Marissa
Saft, Howard
Santhosh, Lekshmi
Schwab, Kristin
Villalba, Dario
Sevin, Carla M.
Montgomery, Ashley A.
author_facet Danesh, Valerie
Boehm, Leanne M.
Eaton, Tammy L.
Arroliga, Alejandro C.
Mayer, Kirby P.
Kesler, Shelli R.
Bakhru, Rita N.
Baram, Michael
Bellinghausen, Amy L.
Biehl, Michelle
Dangayach, Neha S.
Goldstein, Nir M.
Hoehn, K. Sarah
Islam, Marjan
Jagpal, Sugeet
Johnson, Annie B.
Jolley, Sarah E.
Kloos, Janet A.
Mahoney, Eric J.
Maley, Jason H.
Martin, Sara F.
McSparron, Jakob I.
Mery, Marissa
Saft, Howard
Santhosh, Lekshmi
Schwab, Kristin
Villalba, Dario
Sevin, Carla M.
Montgomery, Ashley A.
author_sort Danesh, Valerie
collection PubMed
description The multifaceted long-term impairments resulting from critical illness and COVID-19 require interdisciplinary management approaches in the recovery phase of illness. Operational insights into the structure and process of recovery clinics (RCs) from heterogeneous health systems are needed. This study describes the structure and process characteristics of existing and newly implemented ICU-RCs and COVID-RCs in a subset of large health systems in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Thirty-nine RCs, representing a combined 156 hospitals within 29 health systems participated. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: RC demographics, referral criteria, and operating characteristics were collected, including measures used to assess physical, psychologic, and cognitive recoveries. Thirty-nine RC surveys were completed (94% response rate). ICU-RC teams included physicians, pharmacists, social workers, physical therapists, and advanced practice providers. Funding sources for ICU-RCs included clinical billing (n = 20, 77%), volunteer staff support (n = 15, 58%), institutional staff/space support (n = 13, 46%), and grant or foundation funding (n = 3, 12%). Forty-six percent of RCs report patient visit durations of 1 hour or longer. ICU-RC teams reported use of validated scales to assess psychologic recovery (93%), physical recovery (89%), and cognitive recovery (86%) more often in standard visits compared with COVID-RC teams (psychologic, 54%; physical, 69%; and cognitive, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: Operating structures of RCs vary, though almost all describe modest capacity and reliance on volunteerism and discretionary institutional support. ICU- and COVID-RCs in the United States employ varied funding sources and endorse different assessment measures during visits to guide care coordination. Common features include integration of ICU clinicians, interdisciplinary approach, and focus on severe critical illness. The heterogeneity in RC structures and processes contributes to future research on the optimal structure and process to achieve the best postintensive care syndrome and postacute sequelae of COVID outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89130882022-03-14 Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems Danesh, Valerie Boehm, Leanne M. Eaton, Tammy L. Arroliga, Alejandro C. Mayer, Kirby P. Kesler, Shelli R. Bakhru, Rita N. Baram, Michael Bellinghausen, Amy L. Biehl, Michelle Dangayach, Neha S. Goldstein, Nir M. Hoehn, K. Sarah Islam, Marjan Jagpal, Sugeet Johnson, Annie B. Jolley, Sarah E. Kloos, Janet A. Mahoney, Eric J. Maley, Jason H. Martin, Sara F. McSparron, Jakob I. Mery, Marissa Saft, Howard Santhosh, Lekshmi Schwab, Kristin Villalba, Dario Sevin, Carla M. Montgomery, Ashley A. Crit Care Explor Observational Study The multifaceted long-term impairments resulting from critical illness and COVID-19 require interdisciplinary management approaches in the recovery phase of illness. Operational insights into the structure and process of recovery clinics (RCs) from heterogeneous health systems are needed. This study describes the structure and process characteristics of existing and newly implemented ICU-RCs and COVID-RCs in a subset of large health systems in the United States. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Thirty-nine RCs, representing a combined 156 hospitals within 29 health systems participated. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: RC demographics, referral criteria, and operating characteristics were collected, including measures used to assess physical, psychologic, and cognitive recoveries. Thirty-nine RC surveys were completed (94% response rate). ICU-RC teams included physicians, pharmacists, social workers, physical therapists, and advanced practice providers. Funding sources for ICU-RCs included clinical billing (n = 20, 77%), volunteer staff support (n = 15, 58%), institutional staff/space support (n = 13, 46%), and grant or foundation funding (n = 3, 12%). Forty-six percent of RCs report patient visit durations of 1 hour or longer. ICU-RC teams reported use of validated scales to assess psychologic recovery (93%), physical recovery (89%), and cognitive recovery (86%) more often in standard visits compared with COVID-RC teams (psychologic, 54%; physical, 69%; and cognitive, 46%). CONCLUSIONS: Operating structures of RCs vary, though almost all describe modest capacity and reliance on volunteerism and discretionary institutional support. ICU- and COVID-RCs in the United States employ varied funding sources and endorse different assessment measures during visits to guide care coordination. Common features include integration of ICU clinicians, interdisciplinary approach, and focus on severe critical illness. The heterogeneity in RC structures and processes contributes to future research on the optimal structure and process to achieve the best postintensive care syndrome and postacute sequelae of COVID outcomes. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8913088/ /pubmed/35291316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000658 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Danesh, Valerie
Boehm, Leanne M.
Eaton, Tammy L.
Arroliga, Alejandro C.
Mayer, Kirby P.
Kesler, Shelli R.
Bakhru, Rita N.
Baram, Michael
Bellinghausen, Amy L.
Biehl, Michelle
Dangayach, Neha S.
Goldstein, Nir M.
Hoehn, K. Sarah
Islam, Marjan
Jagpal, Sugeet
Johnson, Annie B.
Jolley, Sarah E.
Kloos, Janet A.
Mahoney, Eric J.
Maley, Jason H.
Martin, Sara F.
McSparron, Jakob I.
Mery, Marissa
Saft, Howard
Santhosh, Lekshmi
Schwab, Kristin
Villalba, Dario
Sevin, Carla M.
Montgomery, Ashley A.
Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems
title Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems
title_full Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems
title_fullStr Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems
title_short Characteristics of Post-ICU and Post-COVID Recovery Clinics in 29 U.S. Health Systems
title_sort characteristics of post-icu and post-covid recovery clinics in 29 u.s. health systems
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000658
work_keys_str_mv AT daneshvalerie characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT boehmleannem characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT eatontammyl characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT arroligaalejandroc characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT mayerkirbyp characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT keslershellir characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT bakhruritan characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT barammichael characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT bellinghausenamyl characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT biehlmichelle characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT dangayachnehas characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT goldsteinnirm characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT hoehnksarah characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT islammarjan characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT jagpalsugeet characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT johnsonannieb characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT jolleysarahe characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT kloosjaneta characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT mahoneyericj characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT maleyjasonh characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT martinsaraf characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT mcsparronjakobi characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT merymarissa characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT safthoward characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT santhoshlekshmi characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT schwabkristin characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT villalbadario characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT sevincarlam characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems
AT montgomeryashleya characteristicsofposticuandpostcovidrecoveryclinicsin29ushealthsystems