Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: More and more studies have shown that cognitive dysfunction is one of the main complications of diabetes. The disorder of glucose and lipid metabolism seriously damages brain function and accelerates the conversion to dementia. At present, there are no drugs that can directly treat diabe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kai, Jiang, Zhenyuan, Yu, Xiaowen, Shao, Yuze, Liu, Hailiang, Wu, Susu, Kong, Linghui, Wang, Zhonglin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028946
_version_ 1784667353283297280
author Wang, Kai
Jiang, Zhenyuan
Yu, Xiaowen
Shao, Yuze
Liu, Hailiang
Wu, Susu
Kong, Linghui
Wang, Zhonglin
author_facet Wang, Kai
Jiang, Zhenyuan
Yu, Xiaowen
Shao, Yuze
Liu, Hailiang
Wu, Susu
Kong, Linghui
Wang, Zhonglin
author_sort Wang, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: More and more studies have shown that cognitive dysfunction is one of the main complications of diabetes. The disorder of glucose and lipid metabolism seriously damages brain function and accelerates the conversion to dementia. At present, there are no drugs that can directly treat diabetic cognitive dysfunction. All drugs for the treatment of this disease achieve the purpose of treatment through strict control of blood sugar levels. This method has great limitations. Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) work through multiple targets and multiple pathways, which can not only effectively correct the state of glucose and lipid metabolism disorders, but also significantly improve cognitive ability, but there is a lack of systematic evaluation of their effectiveness and safety. We use the method of network meta-analysis to systematically and comprehensively compare the effectiveness and safety of different Chinese patent medicines. METHODS: We will comprehensively search the following databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Wanfang database and China BioMedical Literature. We will include all randomized controlled trials that meet the inclusion criteria, starting from the establishment of the database until September 2021. Two researchers will independently screen the literature based on inclusion criteria. While extracting data, we also assess the risk of bias in the included studies. All the data and evidence obtained will be evaluated by the method of Bayesian network meta-analysis. RESULTS: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various TCPMs for diabetic cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide valuable references for the clinical application of TCPMs, and assist clinicians in formulating more reasonable diagnosis and treatment strategies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethical approval. INTERNATIONAL PLATFORM OF REGISTERED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS PROTOCOLS REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202190008.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89131282022-03-15 Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis Wang, Kai Jiang, Zhenyuan Yu, Xiaowen Shao, Yuze Liu, Hailiang Wu, Susu Kong, Linghui Wang, Zhonglin Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 BACKGROUND: More and more studies have shown that cognitive dysfunction is one of the main complications of diabetes. The disorder of glucose and lipid metabolism seriously damages brain function and accelerates the conversion to dementia. At present, there are no drugs that can directly treat diabetic cognitive dysfunction. All drugs for the treatment of this disease achieve the purpose of treatment through strict control of blood sugar levels. This method has great limitations. Traditional Chinese patent medicines (TCPMs) work through multiple targets and multiple pathways, which can not only effectively correct the state of glucose and lipid metabolism disorders, but also significantly improve cognitive ability, but there is a lack of systematic evaluation of their effectiveness and safety. We use the method of network meta-analysis to systematically and comprehensively compare the effectiveness and safety of different Chinese patent medicines. METHODS: We will comprehensively search the following databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Wanfang database and China BioMedical Literature. We will include all randomized controlled trials that meet the inclusion criteria, starting from the establishment of the database until September 2021. Two researchers will independently screen the literature based on inclusion criteria. While extracting data, we also assess the risk of bias in the included studies. All the data and evidence obtained will be evaluated by the method of Bayesian network meta-analysis. RESULTS: This study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various TCPMs for diabetic cognitive dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The results of this study will provide valuable references for the clinical application of TCPMs, and assist clinicians in formulating more reasonable diagnosis and treatment strategies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethical approval. INTERNATIONAL PLATFORM OF REGISTERED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS PROTOCOLS REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202190008. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8913128/ /pubmed/35451386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028946 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5300
Wang, Kai
Jiang, Zhenyuan
Yu, Xiaowen
Shao, Yuze
Liu, Hailiang
Wu, Susu
Kong, Linghui
Wang, Zhonglin
Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: A protocol for systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of traditional chinese patent medicine for cognitive dysfunction in diabetic cognitive dysfunction: a protocol for systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028946
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkai comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT jiangzhenyuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuxiaowen comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT shaoyuze comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT liuhailiang comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wususu comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT konglinghui comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangzhonglin comparativeefficacyandsafetyoftraditionalchinesepatentmedicineforcognitivedysfunctionindiabeticcognitivedysfunctionaprotocolforsystematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysis