Cargando…

Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of new treatment policies is often costly and challenging in complex conditions, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, or in limited-resource settings. We sought to identify hypothetical policies for HCV treatment that could best balance the prevention of cirrhosis while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oselio, Brandon, Singal, Amit G., Zhang, Xuefei, Van, Tony, Liu, Boang, Zhu, Ji, Waljee, Akbar K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01789-7
_version_ 1784667414231777280
author Oselio, Brandon
Singal, Amit G.
Zhang, Xuefei
Van, Tony
Liu, Boang
Zhu, Ji
Waljee, Akbar K.
author_facet Oselio, Brandon
Singal, Amit G.
Zhang, Xuefei
Van, Tony
Liu, Boang
Zhu, Ji
Waljee, Akbar K.
author_sort Oselio, Brandon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluation of new treatment policies is often costly and challenging in complex conditions, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, or in limited-resource settings. We sought to identify hypothetical policies for HCV treatment that could best balance the prevention of cirrhosis while preserving resources (financial or otherwise). METHODS: The cohort consisted of 3792 HCV-infected patients without a history of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma at baseline from the national Veterans Health Administration from 2015 to 2019. To estimate the efficacy of hypothetical treatment policies, we utilized historical data and reinforcement learning to allow for greater flexibility when constructing new HCV treatment strategies. We tested and compared four new treatment policies: a simple stepwise policy based on Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), a logistic regression based on APRI, a logistic regression on multiple longitudinal and demographic indicators that were prespecified for clinical significance, and a treatment policy based on a risk model developed for HCV infection. RESULTS: The risk-based hypothetical treatment policy achieved the lowest overall risk with a score of 0.016 (90% CI 0.016, 0.019) while treating the most high-risk (346.4 ± 1.4) and the fewest low-risk (361.0 ± 20.1) patients. Compared to hypothetical treatment policies that treated approximately the same number of patients (1843.7 vs. 1914.4 patients), the risk-based policy had more untreated time per patient (7968.4 vs. 7742.9 patient visits), signaling cost reduction for the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Off-policy evaluation strategies are useful to evaluate hypothetical treatment policies without implementation. If a quality risk model is available, risk-based treatment strategies can reduce overall risk and prioritize patients while reducing healthcare system costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01789-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89133292022-03-11 Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus Oselio, Brandon Singal, Amit G. Zhang, Xuefei Van, Tony Liu, Boang Zhu, Ji Waljee, Akbar K. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Evaluation of new treatment policies is often costly and challenging in complex conditions, such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, or in limited-resource settings. We sought to identify hypothetical policies for HCV treatment that could best balance the prevention of cirrhosis while preserving resources (financial or otherwise). METHODS: The cohort consisted of 3792 HCV-infected patients without a history of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma at baseline from the national Veterans Health Administration from 2015 to 2019. To estimate the efficacy of hypothetical treatment policies, we utilized historical data and reinforcement learning to allow for greater flexibility when constructing new HCV treatment strategies. We tested and compared four new treatment policies: a simple stepwise policy based on Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), a logistic regression based on APRI, a logistic regression on multiple longitudinal and demographic indicators that were prespecified for clinical significance, and a treatment policy based on a risk model developed for HCV infection. RESULTS: The risk-based hypothetical treatment policy achieved the lowest overall risk with a score of 0.016 (90% CI 0.016, 0.019) while treating the most high-risk (346.4 ± 1.4) and the fewest low-risk (361.0 ± 20.1) patients. Compared to hypothetical treatment policies that treated approximately the same number of patients (1843.7 vs. 1914.4 patients), the risk-based policy had more untreated time per patient (7968.4 vs. 7742.9 patient visits), signaling cost reduction for the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Off-policy evaluation strategies are useful to evaluate hypothetical treatment policies without implementation. If a quality risk model is available, risk-based treatment strategies can reduce overall risk and prioritize patients while reducing healthcare system costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01789-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8913329/ /pubmed/35272662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01789-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Oselio, Brandon
Singal, Amit G.
Zhang, Xuefei
Van, Tony
Liu, Boang
Zhu, Ji
Waljee, Akbar K.
Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus
title Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus
title_full Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus
title_fullStr Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus
title_full_unstemmed Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus
title_short Reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis C virus
title_sort reinforcement learning evaluation of treatment policies for patients with hepatitis c virus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01789-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oseliobrandon reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus
AT singalamitg reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus
AT zhangxuefei reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus
AT vantony reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus
AT liuboang reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus
AT zhuji reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus
AT waljeeakbark reinforcementlearningevaluationoftreatmentpoliciesforpatientswithhepatitiscvirus