Cargando…

Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation

The presence of microorganisms (bacteria, protozoa, viruses, etc.) in water is a crucial indicator of its quality and safety. The detection of these microorganisms by conventional and classical techniques is widely used in water quality control laboratories; nevertheless these methods have limitatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Boujnouni, Hamoucha, Nait Balla, Kaoutar, Belkadi, Bouchra, Rahouti, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.004
_version_ 1784667433767796736
author El Boujnouni, Hamoucha
Nait Balla, Kaoutar
Belkadi, Bouchra
Rahouti, Mohamed
author_facet El Boujnouni, Hamoucha
Nait Balla, Kaoutar
Belkadi, Bouchra
Rahouti, Mohamed
author_sort El Boujnouni, Hamoucha
collection PubMed
description The presence of microorganisms (bacteria, protozoa, viruses, etc.) in water is a crucial indicator of its quality and safety. The detection of these microorganisms by conventional and classical techniques is widely used in water quality control laboratories; nevertheless these methods have limitations in terms of rapidity and precision of results. The use of Molecular Biology has been a great evolution in the techniques of water analysis. However, the choice of the concentration protocol allowing for the best rate of microorganism recovery in a suspension remains a real challenge. The objective of this experimental study is to compare the recovery rate of three different protocols of water concentration (membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation) for samples intended for analysis by polymerase chain reaction PCR. Which can then serve as a reference protocol for water quality control laboratories. The experimental results have shown that the membrane filtration protocol yields the best recovery rate and concentration of microorganisms followed by filtration on gauze pad, while the centrifugation protocol (8000g, 10 min, 22 °C) gives the lowest rate of recovery out of the three protocols. The experimental results obtained through this study allows us to contribute to the optimization and standardization of water samples concentration techniques intended for analysis by Molecular Biology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89134132022-03-12 Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation El Boujnouni, Hamoucha Nait Balla, Kaoutar Belkadi, Bouchra Rahouti, Mohamed Saudi J Biol Sci Original Article The presence of microorganisms (bacteria, protozoa, viruses, etc.) in water is a crucial indicator of its quality and safety. The detection of these microorganisms by conventional and classical techniques is widely used in water quality control laboratories; nevertheless these methods have limitations in terms of rapidity and precision of results. The use of Molecular Biology has been a great evolution in the techniques of water analysis. However, the choice of the concentration protocol allowing for the best rate of microorganism recovery in a suspension remains a real challenge. The objective of this experimental study is to compare the recovery rate of three different protocols of water concentration (membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation) for samples intended for analysis by polymerase chain reaction PCR. Which can then serve as a reference protocol for water quality control laboratories. The experimental results have shown that the membrane filtration protocol yields the best recovery rate and concentration of microorganisms followed by filtration on gauze pad, while the centrifugation protocol (8000g, 10 min, 22 °C) gives the lowest rate of recovery out of the three protocols. The experimental results obtained through this study allows us to contribute to the optimization and standardization of water samples concentration techniques intended for analysis by Molecular Biology. Elsevier 2022-03 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8913413/ /pubmed/35280573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
El Boujnouni, Hamoucha
Nait Balla, Kaoutar
Belkadi, Bouchra
Rahouti, Mohamed
Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
title Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
title_full Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
title_fullStr Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
title_short Comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by Molecular Biology: Membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
title_sort comparison between the recovery rate of three concentration protocols of water samples intended for analysis by molecular biology: membrane filtration, filtration on gauze pad and centrifugation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35280573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.11.004
work_keys_str_mv AT elboujnounihamoucha comparisonbetweentherecoveryrateofthreeconcentrationprotocolsofwatersamplesintendedforanalysisbymolecularbiologymembranefiltrationfiltrationongauzepadandcentrifugation
AT naitballakaoutar comparisonbetweentherecoveryrateofthreeconcentrationprotocolsofwatersamplesintendedforanalysisbymolecularbiologymembranefiltrationfiltrationongauzepadandcentrifugation
AT belkadibouchra comparisonbetweentherecoveryrateofthreeconcentrationprotocolsofwatersamplesintendedforanalysisbymolecularbiologymembranefiltrationfiltrationongauzepadandcentrifugation
AT rahoutimohamed comparisonbetweentherecoveryrateofthreeconcentrationprotocolsofwatersamplesintendedforanalysisbymolecularbiologymembranefiltrationfiltrationongauzepadandcentrifugation