Cargando…

Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum

PURPOSE: To compare the multimodal techniques (including neuronavigation, intraoperative MRI [iMRI], and neuromonitoring [IONM]) and conventional approach (only guided by neuronavigation) in removing glioblastoma (GBM) with corpus callosum (CC) involvement (ccGBM), their effectiveness and safety wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cui, Meng, Chen, Hewen, Sun, Guochen, Liu, Jialin, Zhang, Meng, Lin, Hepu, Sun, Caihong, Ma, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05008-6
_version_ 1784667442468880384
author Cui, Meng
Chen, Hewen
Sun, Guochen
Liu, Jialin
Zhang, Meng
Lin, Hepu
Sun, Caihong
Ma, Xiaodong
author_facet Cui, Meng
Chen, Hewen
Sun, Guochen
Liu, Jialin
Zhang, Meng
Lin, Hepu
Sun, Caihong
Ma, Xiaodong
author_sort Cui, Meng
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the multimodal techniques (including neuronavigation, intraoperative MRI [iMRI], and neuromonitoring [IONM]) and conventional approach (only guided by neuronavigation) in removing glioblastoma (GBM) with corpus callosum (CC) involvement (ccGBM), their effectiveness and safety were analyzed and compared. METHODS: Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for ccGBM cases treated in our hospital between January 2016 and July 2020. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical outcomes, extent of resection (EOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were obtained and compared between the multimodal group (used multimodal techniques) and the conventional group (only used neuronavigation). Both groups only included patients that had maximal safe resection (not biopsy). Postoperative radiochemotherapy was also performed or not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors and optimal EOR threshold. RESULTS: Finally 56 cases of the multimodal group and 21 cases of the conventional group were included. The multimodal group achieved a higher median EOR (100% versus 96.1%, P = 0.036) and gross total resection rate (60.7% versus 33.3%, P = 0.032) and a lower rate of permanent motor deficits (5.4% versus 23.8%, P = 0.052) than the conventional approach. The multimodal group had the longer median PFS (10.9 versus 7.0 months, P = 0.023) and OS (16.1 versus 11.6 months, P = 0.044) than the conventional group. Postoperative language and cognitive function were similar between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, a higher EOR, radiotherapy, and longer cycles of temozolomide chemotherapy were positive prognostic factors for survival of ccGBM. An optimal EOR threshold of 92% was found to significantly benefit the PFS (HR = 0.51, P = 0.036) and OS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.025) of ccGBM. CONCLUSION: Combined use of multimodal techniques can optimize the safe removal of ccGBM. Aggressive resection of EOR > 92% using multimodal techniques combined with postoperative radiochemotherapy should be suggested for ccGBM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05008-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89134502022-03-15 Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum Cui, Meng Chen, Hewen Sun, Guochen Liu, Jialin Zhang, Meng Lin, Hepu Sun, Caihong Ma, Xiaodong Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Tumor - Glioma PURPOSE: To compare the multimodal techniques (including neuronavigation, intraoperative MRI [iMRI], and neuromonitoring [IONM]) and conventional approach (only guided by neuronavigation) in removing glioblastoma (GBM) with corpus callosum (CC) involvement (ccGBM), their effectiveness and safety were analyzed and compared. METHODS: Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for ccGBM cases treated in our hospital between January 2016 and July 2020. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical outcomes, extent of resection (EOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were obtained and compared between the multimodal group (used multimodal techniques) and the conventional group (only used neuronavigation). Both groups only included patients that had maximal safe resection (not biopsy). Postoperative radiochemotherapy was also performed or not. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant prognostic factors and optimal EOR threshold. RESULTS: Finally 56 cases of the multimodal group and 21 cases of the conventional group were included. The multimodal group achieved a higher median EOR (100% versus 96.1%, P = 0.036) and gross total resection rate (60.7% versus 33.3%, P = 0.032) and a lower rate of permanent motor deficits (5.4% versus 23.8%, P = 0.052) than the conventional approach. The multimodal group had the longer median PFS (10.9 versus 7.0 months, P = 0.023) and OS (16.1 versus 11.6 months, P = 0.044) than the conventional group. Postoperative language and cognitive function were similar between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, a higher EOR, radiotherapy, and longer cycles of temozolomide chemotherapy were positive prognostic factors for survival of ccGBM. An optimal EOR threshold of 92% was found to significantly benefit the PFS (HR = 0.51, P = 0.036) and OS (HR = 0.49, P = 0.025) of ccGBM. CONCLUSION: Combined use of multimodal techniques can optimize the safe removal of ccGBM. Aggressive resection of EOR > 92% using multimodal techniques combined with postoperative radiochemotherapy should be suggested for ccGBM. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05008-6. Springer Vienna 2021-10-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8913450/ /pubmed/34636967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05008-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Tumor - Glioma
Cui, Meng
Chen, Hewen
Sun, Guochen
Liu, Jialin
Zhang, Meng
Lin, Hepu
Sun, Caihong
Ma, Xiaodong
Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
title Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
title_full Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
title_fullStr Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
title_full_unstemmed Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
title_short Combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
title_sort combined use of multimodal techniques for the resection of glioblastoma involving corpus callosum
topic Original Article - Tumor - Glioma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05008-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cuimeng combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT chenhewen combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT sunguochen combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT liujialin combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT zhangmeng combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT linhepu combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT suncaihong combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum
AT maxiaodong combineduseofmultimodaltechniquesfortheresectionofglioblastomainvolvingcorpuscallosum