Cargando…

Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the differences in blinking kinematics while reading on different digital displays and a control condition. METHODS: Thirty-two young healthy individuals were included in this prospective clinical study. The blinks of subjects were recorded for 150 s while reading...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talens-Estarelles, Cristian, Esteve-Taboada, José Juan, Sanchis-Jurado, Vicent, Pons, Álvaro M, García-Lázaro, Santiago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05490-9
_version_ 1784667445268578304
author Talens-Estarelles, Cristian
Esteve-Taboada, José Juan
Sanchis-Jurado, Vicent
Pons, Álvaro M
García-Lázaro, Santiago
author_facet Talens-Estarelles, Cristian
Esteve-Taboada, José Juan
Sanchis-Jurado, Vicent
Pons, Álvaro M
García-Lázaro, Santiago
author_sort Talens-Estarelles, Cristian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the differences in blinking kinematics while reading on different digital displays and a control condition. METHODS: Thirty-two young healthy individuals were included in this prospective clinical study. The blinks of subjects were recorded for 150 s while reading on a laptop computer, tablet, e-reader, and smartphone and a control condition. Blinks were recorded using an eye-tracking device and were analyzed by means of image analysis to obtain a non-invasive detailed description of the blink movement. RESULTS: Blink rate decreased when reading on all displays compared to the control (p < 0.0005), although no differences were obtained amongst displays (p > 0.05). The percentage of incomplete blinks was higher with the computer compared to the control (p = 0.043), and lower with the smartphone compared to the rest of the conditions (p ≤ 0.015). Blink amplitude was smaller when reading from handheld devices compared to the control (p < 0.0005) and the computer (p ≤ 0.048). Closing and opening blink durations remained unvaried amongst conditions (p > 0.05), while opening and closing speeds were greater for the control and the computer compared to the handheld displays (p < 0.0005). Finally, contact and total blink durations were shorter during computer reading compared to the control (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: Blinking kinematics vary considerably amongst displays and with respect to baseline, with these differences being probably attributed to differences in the way the displays are set up and the cognitive demand of the task. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89134632022-03-15 Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use Talens-Estarelles, Cristian Esteve-Taboada, José Juan Sanchis-Jurado, Vicent Pons, Álvaro M García-Lázaro, Santiago Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Basic Science PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the differences in blinking kinematics while reading on different digital displays and a control condition. METHODS: Thirty-two young healthy individuals were included in this prospective clinical study. The blinks of subjects were recorded for 150 s while reading on a laptop computer, tablet, e-reader, and smartphone and a control condition. Blinks were recorded using an eye-tracking device and were analyzed by means of image analysis to obtain a non-invasive detailed description of the blink movement. RESULTS: Blink rate decreased when reading on all displays compared to the control (p < 0.0005), although no differences were obtained amongst displays (p > 0.05). The percentage of incomplete blinks was higher with the computer compared to the control (p = 0.043), and lower with the smartphone compared to the rest of the conditions (p ≤ 0.015). Blink amplitude was smaller when reading from handheld devices compared to the control (p < 0.0005) and the computer (p ≤ 0.048). Closing and opening blink durations remained unvaried amongst conditions (p > 0.05), while opening and closing speeds were greater for the control and the computer compared to the handheld displays (p < 0.0005). Finally, contact and total blink durations were shorter during computer reading compared to the control (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: Blinking kinematics vary considerably amongst displays and with respect to baseline, with these differences being probably attributed to differences in the way the displays are set up and the cognitive demand of the task. [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8913463/ /pubmed/34779906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05490-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Basic Science
Talens-Estarelles, Cristian
Esteve-Taboada, José Juan
Sanchis-Jurado, Vicent
Pons, Álvaro M
García-Lázaro, Santiago
Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
title Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
title_full Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
title_fullStr Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
title_full_unstemmed Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
title_short Blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
title_sort blinking kinematics characterization during digital displays use
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34779906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05490-9
work_keys_str_mv AT talensestarellescristian blinkingkinematicscharacterizationduringdigitaldisplaysuse
AT estevetaboadajosejuan blinkingkinematicscharacterizationduringdigitaldisplaysuse
AT sanchisjuradovicent blinkingkinematicscharacterizationduringdigitaldisplaysuse
AT ponsalvarom blinkingkinematicscharacterizationduringdigitaldisplaysuse
AT garcialazarosantiago blinkingkinematicscharacterizationduringdigitaldisplaysuse