Cargando…
The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants
BACKGROUND: Manual moulding of cranioplasty implants after craniectomy is feasible, but does not always yield satisfying cosmetic results. In contrast, 3D printing can provide precise templates for intraoperative moulding of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants in cranioplasty. Here, we present a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05077-7 |
_version_ | 1784667450253508608 |
---|---|
author | Pöppe, Johannes P. Spendel, Mathias Schwartz, Christoph Winkler, Peter A. Wittig, Jörn |
author_facet | Pöppe, Johannes P. Spendel, Mathias Schwartz, Christoph Winkler, Peter A. Wittig, Jörn |
author_sort | Pöppe, Johannes P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Manual moulding of cranioplasty implants after craniectomy is feasible, but does not always yield satisfying cosmetic results. In contrast, 3D printing can provide precise templates for intraoperative moulding of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants in cranioplasty. Here, we present a novel and easily implementable 3D printing workflow to produce patient-specific, sterilisable templates for PMMA implant moulding in cranioplastic neurosurgery. METHODS: 3D printable templates of patients with large skull defects before and after craniectomy were designed virtually from cranial CT scans. Both templates — a mould to reconstruct the outer skull shape and a ring representing the craniectomy defect margins — were printed on a desktop 3D printer with biocompatible photopolymer resins and sterilised after curing. Implant moulding and implantation were then performed intraoperatively using the templates. Clinical and radiological data were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Sixteen PMMA implants were performed on 14 consecutive patients within a time span of 10 months. The median defect size was 83.4 cm(2) (range 57.8–120.1 cm(2)). Median age was 51 (range 21–80) years, and median operating time was 82.5 (range 52–152) min. No intraoperative complications occurred; PMMA moulding was uneventful and all implants fitted well into craniectomy defects. Excellent skull reconstruction could be confirmed in all postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. In three (21.4%) patients with distinct risk factors for postoperative haematoma, revision surgery for epidural haematoma had to be performed. No surgery-related mortality or new and permanent neurologic deficits were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our novel 3D printing-aided moulding workflow for elective cranioplasty with patient-specific PMMA implants proved to be an easily implementable alternative to solely manual implant moulding. The “springform” principle, focusing on reconstruction of the precraniectomy skull shape and perfect closure of the craniectomy defect, was feasible and showed excellent cosmetic results. The proposed method combines the precision and cosmetic advantages of computer-aided design (CAD) implants with the cost-effectiveness of manually moulded PMMA implants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05077-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8913485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89134852022-03-15 The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants Pöppe, Johannes P. Spendel, Mathias Schwartz, Christoph Winkler, Peter A. Wittig, Jörn Acta Neurochir (Wien) Technical Note - Neurosurgical technique evaluation BACKGROUND: Manual moulding of cranioplasty implants after craniectomy is feasible, but does not always yield satisfying cosmetic results. In contrast, 3D printing can provide precise templates for intraoperative moulding of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implants in cranioplasty. Here, we present a novel and easily implementable 3D printing workflow to produce patient-specific, sterilisable templates for PMMA implant moulding in cranioplastic neurosurgery. METHODS: 3D printable templates of patients with large skull defects before and after craniectomy were designed virtually from cranial CT scans. Both templates — a mould to reconstruct the outer skull shape and a ring representing the craniectomy defect margins — were printed on a desktop 3D printer with biocompatible photopolymer resins and sterilised after curing. Implant moulding and implantation were then performed intraoperatively using the templates. Clinical and radiological data were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Sixteen PMMA implants were performed on 14 consecutive patients within a time span of 10 months. The median defect size was 83.4 cm(2) (range 57.8–120.1 cm(2)). Median age was 51 (range 21–80) years, and median operating time was 82.5 (range 52–152) min. No intraoperative complications occurred; PMMA moulding was uneventful and all implants fitted well into craniectomy defects. Excellent skull reconstruction could be confirmed in all postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. In three (21.4%) patients with distinct risk factors for postoperative haematoma, revision surgery for epidural haematoma had to be performed. No surgery-related mortality or new and permanent neurologic deficits were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our novel 3D printing-aided moulding workflow for elective cranioplasty with patient-specific PMMA implants proved to be an easily implementable alternative to solely manual implant moulding. The “springform” principle, focusing on reconstruction of the precraniectomy skull shape and perfect closure of the craniectomy defect, was feasible and showed excellent cosmetic results. The proposed method combines the precision and cosmetic advantages of computer-aided design (CAD) implants with the cost-effectiveness of manually moulded PMMA implants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05077-7. Springer Vienna 2021-12-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8913485/ /pubmed/34873659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05077-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Technical Note - Neurosurgical technique evaluation Pöppe, Johannes P. Spendel, Mathias Schwartz, Christoph Winkler, Peter A. Wittig, Jörn The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
title | The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
title_full | The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
title_fullStr | The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
title_full_unstemmed | The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
title_short | The “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3D-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
title_sort | “springform” technique in cranioplasty: custom made 3d-printed templates for intraoperative modelling of polymethylmethacrylate cranial implants |
topic | Technical Note - Neurosurgical technique evaluation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-021-05077-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poppejohannesp thespringformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT spendelmathias thespringformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT schwartzchristoph thespringformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT winklerpetera thespringformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT wittigjorn thespringformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT poppejohannesp springformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT spendelmathias springformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT schwartzchristoph springformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT winklerpetera springformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants AT wittigjorn springformtechniqueincranioplastycustommade3dprintedtemplatesforintraoperativemodellingofpolymethylmethacrylatecranialimplants |