Cargando…

Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales

The compatibility of forestry and koala conservation is a controversial issue. We used a BACIPS design to assess change in koala density after selective harvesting with regulations to protect environmental values. We also assessed additional sites heavily harvested 5–10 years previously, now dominat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Law, Brad, Gonsalves, Leroy, Burgar, Joanna, Brassil, Traecey, Kerr, Isobel, O’Loughlin, Chris, Eichinski, Phil, Roe, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08013-6
_version_ 1784667533939310592
author Law, Brad
Gonsalves, Leroy
Burgar, Joanna
Brassil, Traecey
Kerr, Isobel
O’Loughlin, Chris
Eichinski, Phil
Roe, Paul
author_facet Law, Brad
Gonsalves, Leroy
Burgar, Joanna
Brassil, Traecey
Kerr, Isobel
O’Loughlin, Chris
Eichinski, Phil
Roe, Paul
author_sort Law, Brad
collection PubMed
description The compatibility of forestry and koala conservation is a controversial issue. We used a BACIPS design to assess change in koala density after selective harvesting with regulations to protect environmental values. We also assessed additional sites heavily harvested 5–10 years previously, now dominated by young regeneration. We used replicate arrays of acoustic sensors and spatial count modelling of male bellowing to estimate male koala density over 3600 ha. Paired sites in nearby National Parks served as controls. Naïve occupancy was close to 100% before and after harvesting, indicating koalas were widespread across all arrays. Average density was higher than expected for forests in NSW, varying between arrays from 0.03–0.08 males ha(−1). There was no significant effect of selective harvesting on density and little change evident between years. Density 5–10 years after previous heavy harvesting was equivalent to controls, with one harvested array supporting the second highest density in the study. Within arrays, density was similar between areas mapped as selectively harvested or excluded from harvest. Density was also high in young regeneration 5–10 years after heavy harvesting. We conclude that native forestry regulations provided sufficient habitat for koalas to maintain their density, both immediately after selective harvesting and 5–10 years after heavy harvesting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89138022022-03-14 Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales Law, Brad Gonsalves, Leroy Burgar, Joanna Brassil, Traecey Kerr, Isobel O’Loughlin, Chris Eichinski, Phil Roe, Paul Sci Rep Article The compatibility of forestry and koala conservation is a controversial issue. We used a BACIPS design to assess change in koala density after selective harvesting with regulations to protect environmental values. We also assessed additional sites heavily harvested 5–10 years previously, now dominated by young regeneration. We used replicate arrays of acoustic sensors and spatial count modelling of male bellowing to estimate male koala density over 3600 ha. Paired sites in nearby National Parks served as controls. Naïve occupancy was close to 100% before and after harvesting, indicating koalas were widespread across all arrays. Average density was higher than expected for forests in NSW, varying between arrays from 0.03–0.08 males ha(−1). There was no significant effect of selective harvesting on density and little change evident between years. Density 5–10 years after previous heavy harvesting was equivalent to controls, with one harvested array supporting the second highest density in the study. Within arrays, density was similar between areas mapped as selectively harvested or excluded from harvest. Density was also high in young regeneration 5–10 years after heavy harvesting. We conclude that native forestry regulations provided sufficient habitat for koalas to maintain their density, both immediately after selective harvesting and 5–10 years after heavy harvesting. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8913802/ /pubmed/35273315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08013-6 Text en © Crown 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Law, Brad
Gonsalves, Leroy
Burgar, Joanna
Brassil, Traecey
Kerr, Isobel
O’Loughlin, Chris
Eichinski, Phil
Roe, Paul
Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales
title Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales
title_full Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales
title_fullStr Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales
title_full_unstemmed Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales
title_short Regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of New South Wales
title_sort regulated timber harvesting does not reduce koala density in north-east forests of new south wales
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08013-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lawbrad regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT gonsalvesleroy regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT burgarjoanna regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT brassiltraecey regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT kerrisobel regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT oloughlinchris regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT eichinskiphil regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales
AT roepaul regulatedtimberharvestingdoesnotreducekoaladensityinnortheastforestsofnewsouthwales