Cargando…

Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin

The present study evaluated the efficacy of ethanol treatment (0, 30, 50, or 70%) alone or in combination with ultrasound (37 kHz, 380 W) for the reduction of natural indigenous mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB), coliforms, and inoculated Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin. Bacterial cells with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, M.K., Jeong, H.L., Han, S.H., Kang, I., Ha, S.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez486
_version_ 1784667575461871616
author Seo, M.K.
Jeong, H.L.
Han, S.H.
Kang, I.
Ha, S.D.
author_facet Seo, M.K.
Jeong, H.L.
Han, S.H.
Kang, I.
Ha, S.D.
author_sort Seo, M.K.
collection PubMed
description The present study evaluated the efficacy of ethanol treatment (0, 30, 50, or 70%) alone or in combination with ultrasound (37 kHz, 380 W) for the reduction of natural indigenous mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB), coliforms, and inoculated Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin. Bacterial cells with loose, intermediate, or tight attachment to chicken skin were recovered by shaking in an incubator (200 rpm) for 5 min, stomaching for 1 min, or blending for 1 min, respectively. Chicken skins were inoculated with a suspension (7 log CFU/mL) of S. Typhimurium. Ethanol reduced the number of MAB, coliforms, and S. Typhimurium on the chicken skin in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas ultrasound treatment without ethanol was ineffective. A combination of 70% ethanol with ultrasound treatment was the most effective in reducing S. Typhimurium populations with loose, intermediate, and tight attachment (reduction by 2.86 log CFU/g, 2.49 log CFU/g, and 1.63 log CFU/g, respectively). However, chicken skin treated with 50% ethanol alone or with a combination of >50% ethanol and ultrasound showed significant changes in Hunter color values (a* and b*) and texture (shear force) (P > 0.05). On the other hand, a combination of 30% ethanol and ultrasound yielded the best results, leading to a reduction of S. Typhimurium by a >1.0 log CFU/g, but did not alter the color or texture of chicken skin. Thus, a combination of 30% ethanol and ultrasound appears to be the optimum treatment for reduction of microbial contamination in production and distribution of skin-on chicken products, and enhance poultry safety without decreasing food quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89139462022-03-12 Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin Seo, M.K. Jeong, H.L. Han, S.H. Kang, I. Ha, S.D. Poult Sci Microbiology and Food Safety The present study evaluated the efficacy of ethanol treatment (0, 30, 50, or 70%) alone or in combination with ultrasound (37 kHz, 380 W) for the reduction of natural indigenous mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB), coliforms, and inoculated Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin. Bacterial cells with loose, intermediate, or tight attachment to chicken skin were recovered by shaking in an incubator (200 rpm) for 5 min, stomaching for 1 min, or blending for 1 min, respectively. Chicken skins were inoculated with a suspension (7 log CFU/mL) of S. Typhimurium. Ethanol reduced the number of MAB, coliforms, and S. Typhimurium on the chicken skin in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas ultrasound treatment without ethanol was ineffective. A combination of 70% ethanol with ultrasound treatment was the most effective in reducing S. Typhimurium populations with loose, intermediate, and tight attachment (reduction by 2.86 log CFU/g, 2.49 log CFU/g, and 1.63 log CFU/g, respectively). However, chicken skin treated with 50% ethanol alone or with a combination of >50% ethanol and ultrasound showed significant changes in Hunter color values (a* and b*) and texture (shear force) (P > 0.05). On the other hand, a combination of 30% ethanol and ultrasound yielded the best results, leading to a reduction of S. Typhimurium by a >1.0 log CFU/g, but did not alter the color or texture of chicken skin. Thus, a combination of 30% ethanol and ultrasound appears to be the optimum treatment for reduction of microbial contamination in production and distribution of skin-on chicken products, and enhance poultry safety without decreasing food quality. Elsevier 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8913946/ /pubmed/31504943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez486 Text en © 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Microbiology and Food Safety
Seo, M.K.
Jeong, H.L.
Han, S.H.
Kang, I.
Ha, S.D.
Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin
title Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin
title_full Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin
title_fullStr Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin
title_full_unstemmed Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin
title_short Impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Salmonella Typhimurium on chicken skin
title_sort impact of ethanol and ultrasound treatment on mesophilic aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and salmonella typhimurium on chicken skin
topic Microbiology and Food Safety
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez486
work_keys_str_mv AT seomk impactofethanolandultrasoundtreatmentonmesophilicaerobicbacteriacoliformsandsalmonellatyphimuriumonchickenskin
AT jeonghl impactofethanolandultrasoundtreatmentonmesophilicaerobicbacteriacoliformsandsalmonellatyphimuriumonchickenskin
AT hansh impactofethanolandultrasoundtreatmentonmesophilicaerobicbacteriacoliformsandsalmonellatyphimuriumonchickenskin
AT kangi impactofethanolandultrasoundtreatmentonmesophilicaerobicbacteriacoliformsandsalmonellatyphimuriumonchickenskin
AT hasd impactofethanolandultrasoundtreatmentonmesophilicaerobicbacteriacoliformsandsalmonellatyphimuriumonchickenskin