Cargando…
Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas pla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez526 |
_version_ | 1784667579084701696 |
---|---|
author | Schreuder, Janneke Velkers, Francisca C. Bouwstra, Ruth J. Beerens, Nancy Stegeman, J. Arjan de Boer, Willem F. Elbers, Armin R.W. van Hooft, Pim Feberwee, Anneke Bossers, Alex Jurburg, Stephanie D. |
author_facet | Schreuder, Janneke Velkers, Francisca C. Bouwstra, Ruth J. Beerens, Nancy Stegeman, J. Arjan de Boer, Willem F. Elbers, Armin R.W. van Hooft, Pim Feberwee, Anneke Bossers, Alex Jurburg, Stephanie D. |
author_sort | Schreuder, Janneke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas platyrhynchos) resulted in a hen fecal microbiome that was detectably altered on community parameters or relative abundances of individual genera. To distinguish between effects of the duck inoculum and effects of the inoculation procedure, we compared the fecal microbiomes of adult laying hens resulting from 3 treatments: inoculation with wild duck feces (duck), inoculation with chicken feces (auto), and a negative control group with no treatment. We collected cloacal swabs from 7 hens per treatment before (day 0), and 2 and 7 D after inoculation, and performed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. No distinguishable effect of inoculation with duck feces on microbiome community (alpha and beta diversity) was found compared to auto or control treatments. At the individual taxonomic level, the relative abundance of the genus Alistipes (phylum Bacteroidetes) was significantly higher in the inoculated treatments (auto and duck) compared to the control 2 D after inoculation. Seven days after inoculation, the relative abundance of Alistipes had increased in the control and no effect was found anymore across treatments. These effects might be explained by the perturbation of the hen's microbiome caused by the inoculation procedure itself, or by intrinsic temporal variation in the hen's microbiome. This experiment shows that a single inoculation of fecal microbiota from duck feces to laying hens did not cause a measurable alteration of the gut microbiome community. Furthermore, the temporary change in relative abundance forAlistipes could not be attributed to the duck feces inoculation. These outcomes suggest that the fecal microbiome of adult laying hens may not be a useful indicator for detection of single oral exposure to wild duck feces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8913958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89139582022-03-12 Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces Schreuder, Janneke Velkers, Francisca C. Bouwstra, Ruth J. Beerens, Nancy Stegeman, J. Arjan de Boer, Willem F. Elbers, Armin R.W. van Hooft, Pim Feberwee, Anneke Bossers, Alex Jurburg, Stephanie D. Poult Sci Immunology, Health and Disease Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas platyrhynchos) resulted in a hen fecal microbiome that was detectably altered on community parameters or relative abundances of individual genera. To distinguish between effects of the duck inoculum and effects of the inoculation procedure, we compared the fecal microbiomes of adult laying hens resulting from 3 treatments: inoculation with wild duck feces (duck), inoculation with chicken feces (auto), and a negative control group with no treatment. We collected cloacal swabs from 7 hens per treatment before (day 0), and 2 and 7 D after inoculation, and performed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. No distinguishable effect of inoculation with duck feces on microbiome community (alpha and beta diversity) was found compared to auto or control treatments. At the individual taxonomic level, the relative abundance of the genus Alistipes (phylum Bacteroidetes) was significantly higher in the inoculated treatments (auto and duck) compared to the control 2 D after inoculation. Seven days after inoculation, the relative abundance of Alistipes had increased in the control and no effect was found anymore across treatments. These effects might be explained by the perturbation of the hen's microbiome caused by the inoculation procedure itself, or by intrinsic temporal variation in the hen's microbiome. This experiment shows that a single inoculation of fecal microbiota from duck feces to laying hens did not cause a measurable alteration of the gut microbiome community. Furthermore, the temporary change in relative abundance forAlistipes could not be attributed to the duck feces inoculation. These outcomes suggest that the fecal microbiome of adult laying hens may not be a useful indicator for detection of single oral exposure to wild duck feces. Elsevier 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8913958/ /pubmed/31541252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez526 Text en © 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Immunology, Health and Disease Schreuder, Janneke Velkers, Francisca C. Bouwstra, Ruth J. Beerens, Nancy Stegeman, J. Arjan de Boer, Willem F. Elbers, Armin R.W. van Hooft, Pim Feberwee, Anneke Bossers, Alex Jurburg, Stephanie D. Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
title | Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
title_full | Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
title_fullStr | Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
title_full_unstemmed | Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
title_short | Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
title_sort | limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces |
topic | Immunology, Health and Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez526 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreuderjanneke limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT velkersfranciscac limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT bouwstraruthj limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT beerensnancy limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT stegemanjarjan limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT deboerwillemf limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT elbersarminrw limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT vanhooftpim limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT feberweeanneke limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT bossersalex limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces AT jurburgstephanied limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces |