Cargando…

Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces

Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreuder, Janneke, Velkers, Francisca C., Bouwstra, Ruth J., Beerens, Nancy, Stegeman, J. Arjan, de Boer, Willem F., Elbers, Armin R.W., van Hooft, Pim, Feberwee, Anneke, Bossers, Alex, Jurburg, Stephanie D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez526
_version_ 1784667579084701696
author Schreuder, Janneke
Velkers, Francisca C.
Bouwstra, Ruth J.
Beerens, Nancy
Stegeman, J. Arjan
de Boer, Willem F.
Elbers, Armin R.W.
van Hooft, Pim
Feberwee, Anneke
Bossers, Alex
Jurburg, Stephanie D.
author_facet Schreuder, Janneke
Velkers, Francisca C.
Bouwstra, Ruth J.
Beerens, Nancy
Stegeman, J. Arjan
de Boer, Willem F.
Elbers, Armin R.W.
van Hooft, Pim
Feberwee, Anneke
Bossers, Alex
Jurburg, Stephanie D.
author_sort Schreuder, Janneke
collection PubMed
description Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas platyrhynchos) resulted in a hen fecal microbiome that was detectably altered on community parameters or relative abundances of individual genera. To distinguish between effects of the duck inoculum and effects of the inoculation procedure, we compared the fecal microbiomes of adult laying hens resulting from 3 treatments: inoculation with wild duck feces (duck), inoculation with chicken feces (auto), and a negative control group with no treatment. We collected cloacal swabs from 7 hens per treatment before (day 0), and 2 and 7 D after inoculation, and performed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. No distinguishable effect of inoculation with duck feces on microbiome community (alpha and beta diversity) was found compared to auto or control treatments. At the individual taxonomic level, the relative abundance of the genus Alistipes (phylum Bacteroidetes) was significantly higher in the inoculated treatments (auto and duck) compared to the control 2 D after inoculation. Seven days after inoculation, the relative abundance of Alistipes had increased in the control and no effect was found anymore across treatments. These effects might be explained by the perturbation of the hen's microbiome caused by the inoculation procedure itself, or by intrinsic temporal variation in the hen's microbiome. This experiment shows that a single inoculation of fecal microbiota from duck feces to laying hens did not cause a measurable alteration of the gut microbiome community. Furthermore, the temporary change in relative abundance forAlistipes could not be attributed to the duck feces inoculation. These outcomes suggest that the fecal microbiome of adult laying hens may not be a useful indicator for detection of single oral exposure to wild duck feces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8913958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89139582022-03-12 Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces Schreuder, Janneke Velkers, Francisca C. Bouwstra, Ruth J. Beerens, Nancy Stegeman, J. Arjan de Boer, Willem F. Elbers, Armin R.W. van Hooft, Pim Feberwee, Anneke Bossers, Alex Jurburg, Stephanie D. Poult Sci Immunology, Health and Disease Interspecies transmission of fecal microbiota can serve as an indicator for (indirect) contact between domestic and wild animals to assess risks of pathogen transmission, e.g., avian influenza. Here, we investigated whether oral inoculation of laying hens with feces of wild ducks (mallards, Anas platyrhynchos) resulted in a hen fecal microbiome that was detectably altered on community parameters or relative abundances of individual genera. To distinguish between effects of the duck inoculum and effects of the inoculation procedure, we compared the fecal microbiomes of adult laying hens resulting from 3 treatments: inoculation with wild duck feces (duck), inoculation with chicken feces (auto), and a negative control group with no treatment. We collected cloacal swabs from 7 hens per treatment before (day 0), and 2 and 7 D after inoculation, and performed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. No distinguishable effect of inoculation with duck feces on microbiome community (alpha and beta diversity) was found compared to auto or control treatments. At the individual taxonomic level, the relative abundance of the genus Alistipes (phylum Bacteroidetes) was significantly higher in the inoculated treatments (auto and duck) compared to the control 2 D after inoculation. Seven days after inoculation, the relative abundance of Alistipes had increased in the control and no effect was found anymore across treatments. These effects might be explained by the perturbation of the hen's microbiome caused by the inoculation procedure itself, or by intrinsic temporal variation in the hen's microbiome. This experiment shows that a single inoculation of fecal microbiota from duck feces to laying hens did not cause a measurable alteration of the gut microbiome community. Furthermore, the temporary change in relative abundance forAlistipes could not be attributed to the duck feces inoculation. These outcomes suggest that the fecal microbiome of adult laying hens may not be a useful indicator for detection of single oral exposure to wild duck feces. Elsevier 2019-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8913958/ /pubmed/31541252 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez526 Text en © 2019 Poultry Science Association Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Immunology, Health and Disease
Schreuder, Janneke
Velkers, Francisca C.
Bouwstra, Ruth J.
Beerens, Nancy
Stegeman, J. Arjan
de Boer, Willem F.
Elbers, Armin R.W.
van Hooft, Pim
Feberwee, Anneke
Bossers, Alex
Jurburg, Stephanie D.
Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
title Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
title_full Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
title_fullStr Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
title_full_unstemmed Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
title_short Limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
title_sort limited changes in the fecal microbiome composition of laying hens after oral inoculation with wild duck feces
topic Immunology, Health and Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8913958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31541252
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez526
work_keys_str_mv AT schreuderjanneke limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT velkersfranciscac limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT bouwstraruthj limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT beerensnancy limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT stegemanjarjan limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT deboerwillemf limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT elbersarminrw limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT vanhooftpim limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT feberweeanneke limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT bossersalex limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces
AT jurburgstephanied limitedchangesinthefecalmicrobiomecompositionoflayinghensafteroralinoculationwithwildduckfeces