Cargando…

Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure

OBJECTIVE: We introduce the trans-umbilical single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst. Compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the new method and traditional laparoscopy-assisted procedure. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shan, Chen, Jianglong, Tang, Kunbin, He, Yufeng, Xu, Xinru, Xu, Di
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.806919
_version_ 1784667658740826112
author Lin, Shan
Chen, Jianglong
Tang, Kunbin
He, Yufeng
Xu, Xinru
Xu, Di
author_facet Lin, Shan
Chen, Jianglong
Tang, Kunbin
He, Yufeng
Xu, Xinru
Xu, Di
author_sort Lin, Shan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We introduce the trans-umbilical single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst. Compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the new method and traditional laparoscopy-assisted procedure. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 51 children diagnosed with choledochal cysts and received surgery from June 2019 to December 2020 at our department. About 24 patients who underwent the robot-assisted procedure were selected as the R group, and 27 patients who underwent the laparoscope-assisted procedure were selected as the L group. We compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. RESULT: No significant differences were found in demographic information between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median total operative time, median port/trocar installation time, and median wound suture time of the R group were a little longer than the L group (217.63 ± 5.90 vs. 199.37 ± 5.13 min; 30.71 ± 3.18 vs. 6.11 ± 1.15 min; 30.79 ± 1.82 vs. 20.40 ± 3.12 min, respectively; P < 0.001). However, the R group had shorter choledochal cyst excision time and mean hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis time than the L group (52.04 ± 2.74 vs. 59.26 ± 3.23 min; 52.42 ± 2.72 vs. 60.63 ± 3.30 min, respectively, P < 0.001). The mean extracorporeal Roux-y jejunojejunostomy time of two groups has no remarkable difference (P > 0.05). The R group also had less mean volume of blood loss (7.04 ± 1.16 vs. 29.04 ± 18.21 mL; P < 0.001). The R group had a shorter indwelling time of gastric tube, anal exhaust time, water feeding time, solids feeding time, and hospital stay time than the L group (P < 0.05). The R group had a lower early complication rate than the L group (4.2 vs. 29.63%; P = 0.026). No statistical differences were identified between the two groups in late or any single complication (0.00 vs. 11.11%; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A resection of the choledochal cyst and a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy can be performed much more precisely by single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery. Patients can achieve rapid recovery, and the umbilical incision is more concealed and beautiful. Combing the experience of single-site surgery with robot-assisted surgery, the operators can implement the technique in children safely and feasibly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8914220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89142202022-03-12 Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure Lin, Shan Chen, Jianglong Tang, Kunbin He, Yufeng Xu, Xinru Xu, Di Front Pediatr Pediatrics OBJECTIVE: We introduce the trans-umbilical single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst. Compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the new method and traditional laparoscopy-assisted procedure. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 51 children diagnosed with choledochal cysts and received surgery from June 2019 to December 2020 at our department. About 24 patients who underwent the robot-assisted procedure were selected as the R group, and 27 patients who underwent the laparoscope-assisted procedure were selected as the L group. We compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between the two groups. RESULT: No significant differences were found in demographic information between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median total operative time, median port/trocar installation time, and median wound suture time of the R group were a little longer than the L group (217.63 ± 5.90 vs. 199.37 ± 5.13 min; 30.71 ± 3.18 vs. 6.11 ± 1.15 min; 30.79 ± 1.82 vs. 20.40 ± 3.12 min, respectively; P < 0.001). However, the R group had shorter choledochal cyst excision time and mean hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis time than the L group (52.04 ± 2.74 vs. 59.26 ± 3.23 min; 52.42 ± 2.72 vs. 60.63 ± 3.30 min, respectively, P < 0.001). The mean extracorporeal Roux-y jejunojejunostomy time of two groups has no remarkable difference (P > 0.05). The R group also had less mean volume of blood loss (7.04 ± 1.16 vs. 29.04 ± 18.21 mL; P < 0.001). The R group had a shorter indwelling time of gastric tube, anal exhaust time, water feeding time, solids feeding time, and hospital stay time than the L group (P < 0.05). The R group had a lower early complication rate than the L group (4.2 vs. 29.63%; P = 0.026). No statistical differences were identified between the two groups in late or any single complication (0.00 vs. 11.11%; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A resection of the choledochal cyst and a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy can be performed much more precisely by single-site plus one robotic-assisted surgery. Patients can achieve rapid recovery, and the umbilical incision is more concealed and beautiful. Combing the experience of single-site surgery with robot-assisted surgery, the operators can implement the technique in children safely and feasibly. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8914220/ /pubmed/35281244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.806919 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lin, Chen, Tang, He, Xu and Xu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Lin, Shan
Chen, Jianglong
Tang, Kunbin
He, Yufeng
Xu, Xinru
Xu, Di
Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure
title Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure
title_full Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure
title_fullStr Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure
title_short Trans-umbilical Single-Site Plus One Robotic Assisted Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children, a Comparing to Laparoscope-Assisted Procedure
title_sort trans-umbilical single-site plus one robotic assisted surgery for choledochal cyst in children, a comparing to laparoscope-assisted procedure
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35281244
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.806919
work_keys_str_mv AT linshan transumbilicalsinglesiteplusoneroboticassistedsurgeryforcholedochalcystinchildrenacomparingtolaparoscopeassistedprocedure
AT chenjianglong transumbilicalsinglesiteplusoneroboticassistedsurgeryforcholedochalcystinchildrenacomparingtolaparoscopeassistedprocedure
AT tangkunbin transumbilicalsinglesiteplusoneroboticassistedsurgeryforcholedochalcystinchildrenacomparingtolaparoscopeassistedprocedure
AT heyufeng transumbilicalsinglesiteplusoneroboticassistedsurgeryforcholedochalcystinchildrenacomparingtolaparoscopeassistedprocedure
AT xuxinru transumbilicalsinglesiteplusoneroboticassistedsurgeryforcholedochalcystinchildrenacomparingtolaparoscopeassistedprocedure
AT xudi transumbilicalsinglesiteplusoneroboticassistedsurgeryforcholedochalcystinchildrenacomparingtolaparoscopeassistedprocedure