Cargando…

Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)

In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food/feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (OSR) MS11 because of the lack of an appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, Ewen, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Gennaro, Andrea, Neri, Franco Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35311007
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7190
_version_ 1784667746328379392
author Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Gennaro, Andrea
Neri, Franco Maria
author_facet Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Gennaro, Andrea
Neri, Franco Maria
collection PubMed
description In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food/feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (OSR) MS11 because of the lack of an appropriate compositional data set. Following a request from the European Commission, the GMO Panel assessed additional information related to OSR MS11 to complement the original scientific opinion. The GMO Panel concluded that the information submitted (on the composition of the two‐event stack MS11 × RF3) could not be used for the assessment of the composition of OSR MS11 and requested the applicant to perform a complementary set of field trials to generate additional data. The applicant did not perform the requested field trials and did not provide any new experimental data on the composition of OSR MS11. Hence, the GMO Panel is still not in the position to conclude on either the compositional analysis or the toxicological, allergenicity or nutritional assessment of OSR MS11. Therefore, the previous conclusions of the GMO Panel still hold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8914582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89145822022-03-18 Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Gennaro, Andrea Neri, Franco Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food/feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (OSR) MS11 because of the lack of an appropriate compositional data set. Following a request from the European Commission, the GMO Panel assessed additional information related to OSR MS11 to complement the original scientific opinion. The GMO Panel concluded that the information submitted (on the composition of the two‐event stack MS11 × RF3) could not be used for the assessment of the composition of OSR MS11 and requested the applicant to perform a complementary set of field trials to generate additional data. The applicant did not perform the requested field trials and did not provide any new experimental data on the composition of OSR MS11. Hence, the GMO Panel is still not in the position to conclude on either the compositional analysis or the toxicological, allergenicity or nutritional assessment of OSR MS11. Therefore, the previous conclusions of the GMO Panel still hold. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8914582/ /pubmed/35311007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7190 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Gennaro, Andrea
Neri, Franco Maria
Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
title Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
title_full Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
title_fullStr Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
title_full_unstemmed Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
title_short Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
title_sort statement complementing the efsa scientific opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape ms11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐be‐2016‐138)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35311007
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7190
work_keys_str_mv AT statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT mullinsewen statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT bressonjeanlouis statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT dalmaytamas statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT dewhurstiancrawford statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT epsteinmichellem statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT firbanklesliegeorge statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT guerchephilippe statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT hejatkojan statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT naegelihanspeter statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT morenofranciscojavier statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT noguefabien statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT rostoksnils statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT sanchezserranojosejuan statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT savoinigiovanni statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT veromanneve statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT veronesifabio statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT gennaroandrea statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138
AT nerifrancomaria statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138