Cargando…
Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)
In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food/feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (OSR) MS11 because of the lack of an appr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35311007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7190 |
_version_ | 1784667746328379392 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Gennaro, Andrea Neri, Franco Maria |
author_facet | Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Gennaro, Andrea Neri, Franco Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food/feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (OSR) MS11 because of the lack of an appropriate compositional data set. Following a request from the European Commission, the GMO Panel assessed additional information related to OSR MS11 to complement the original scientific opinion. The GMO Panel concluded that the information submitted (on the composition of the two‐event stack MS11 × RF3) could not be used for the assessment of the composition of OSR MS11 and requested the applicant to perform a complementary set of field trials to generate additional data. The applicant did not perform the requested field trials and did not provide any new experimental data on the composition of OSR MS11. Hence, the GMO Panel is still not in the position to conclude on either the compositional analysis or the toxicological, allergenicity or nutritional assessment of OSR MS11. Therefore, the previous conclusions of the GMO Panel still hold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8914582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89145822022-03-18 Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Gennaro, Andrea Neri, Franco Maria EFSA J Scientific Opinion In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food/feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape (OSR) MS11 because of the lack of an appropriate compositional data set. Following a request from the European Commission, the GMO Panel assessed additional information related to OSR MS11 to complement the original scientific opinion. The GMO Panel concluded that the information submitted (on the composition of the two‐event stack MS11 × RF3) could not be used for the assessment of the composition of OSR MS11 and requested the applicant to perform a complementary set of field trials to generate additional data. The applicant did not perform the requested field trials and did not provide any new experimental data on the composition of OSR MS11. Hence, the GMO Panel is still not in the position to conclude on either the compositional analysis or the toxicological, allergenicity or nutritional assessment of OSR MS11. Therefore, the previous conclusions of the GMO Panel still hold. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8914582/ /pubmed/35311007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7190 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Gennaro, Andrea Neri, Franco Maria Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) |
title | Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) |
title_full | Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) |
title_fullStr | Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) |
title_full_unstemmed | Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) |
title_short | Statement complementing the EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138) |
title_sort | statement complementing the efsa scientific opinion on the assessment of genetically modified oilseed rape ms11 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐be‐2016‐138) |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35311007 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT mullinsewen statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT bressonjeanlouis statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT dalmaytamas statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT dewhurstiancrawford statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT epsteinmichellem statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT firbanklesliegeorge statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT guerchephilippe statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT hejatkojan statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT naegelihanspeter statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT morenofranciscojavier statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT noguefabien statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT rostoksnils statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT sanchezserranojosejuan statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT savoinigiovanni statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT veromanneve statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT veronesifabio statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT gennaroandrea statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 AT nerifrancomaria statementcomplementingtheefsascientificopinionontheassessmentofgeneticallymodifiedoilseedrapems11forfoodandfeedusesimportandprocessingunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmobe2016138 |