Cargando…
Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes
Objective: To identify and summarize biomechanical assessment approaches in interlimb coordination on poststroke gait. Introduction: Interlimb coordination involves complex neurophysiological mechanisms that can be expressed through the biomechanical output. The deepening of this concept would have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22052010 |
_version_ | 1784667776378470400 |
---|---|
author | Couto, Ana G. B. Vaz, Mário A. P. Pinho, Liliana Félix, José Silva, Sandra Silva, Augusta Sousa, Andreia S. P. |
author_facet | Couto, Ana G. B. Vaz, Mário A. P. Pinho, Liliana Félix, José Silva, Sandra Silva, Augusta Sousa, Andreia S. P. |
author_sort | Couto, Ana G. B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To identify and summarize biomechanical assessment approaches in interlimb coordination on poststroke gait. Introduction: Interlimb coordination involves complex neurophysiological mechanisms that can be expressed through the biomechanical output. The deepening of this concept would have a significant contribution in gait rehabilitation in patients with an asymmetric neurological impairment as poststroke adults. Inclusion criteria: Poststroke adults (>19 years old), with assessment of interlimb coordination during gait, in an open context, according to the Population, Concept, Context framework. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science™, Scopus, and gray literature in Google Scholar™, according to the PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Studies written in Portuguese or English language and published between database inception and 14 November 2021 were included. Qualitative studies, conference proceedings, letters, and editorials were excluded. The main conceptual categories were “author/year”, “study design”, “participant’s characteristics”, “walking conditions”, “instruments” and “outcomes”. Results: The search identified 827 potentially relevant studies, with a remaining seven fulfilling the established criteria. Interlimb coordination was assessed during walking in treadmill (n = 3), overground (n = 3) and both (n = 1). The instruments used monitored electromyography (n = 2), kinetics (n = 2), and kinematics (n = 4) to assess spatiotemporal parameters (n = 4), joint kinematics (n = 2), anteroposterior ground reaction forces (n = 2), and electromyography root mean square (n = 2) outcomes. These outcomes were mostly used to analyze symmetry indices or ratios, to calculate propulsive impulse and external mechanical power produced on the CoM, as well as antagonist coactivation. Conclusions: Assessment of interlimb coordination during gait is important for consideration of natural auto-selected overground walking, using kinematic, kinetic, and EMG instruments. These allow for the collection of the main biomechanical outcomes that could contribute to improve better knowledge of interlimb coordination assessment in poststroke patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8914666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89146662022-03-12 Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes Couto, Ana G. B. Vaz, Mário A. P. Pinho, Liliana Félix, José Silva, Sandra Silva, Augusta Sousa, Andreia S. P. Sensors (Basel) Review Objective: To identify and summarize biomechanical assessment approaches in interlimb coordination on poststroke gait. Introduction: Interlimb coordination involves complex neurophysiological mechanisms that can be expressed through the biomechanical output. The deepening of this concept would have a significant contribution in gait rehabilitation in patients with an asymmetric neurological impairment as poststroke adults. Inclusion criteria: Poststroke adults (>19 years old), with assessment of interlimb coordination during gait, in an open context, according to the Population, Concept, Context framework. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science™, Scopus, and gray literature in Google Scholar™, according to the PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Studies written in Portuguese or English language and published between database inception and 14 November 2021 were included. Qualitative studies, conference proceedings, letters, and editorials were excluded. The main conceptual categories were “author/year”, “study design”, “participant’s characteristics”, “walking conditions”, “instruments” and “outcomes”. Results: The search identified 827 potentially relevant studies, with a remaining seven fulfilling the established criteria. Interlimb coordination was assessed during walking in treadmill (n = 3), overground (n = 3) and both (n = 1). The instruments used monitored electromyography (n = 2), kinetics (n = 2), and kinematics (n = 4) to assess spatiotemporal parameters (n = 4), joint kinematics (n = 2), anteroposterior ground reaction forces (n = 2), and electromyography root mean square (n = 2) outcomes. These outcomes were mostly used to analyze symmetry indices or ratios, to calculate propulsive impulse and external mechanical power produced on the CoM, as well as antagonist coactivation. Conclusions: Assessment of interlimb coordination during gait is important for consideration of natural auto-selected overground walking, using kinematic, kinetic, and EMG instruments. These allow for the collection of the main biomechanical outcomes that could contribute to improve better knowledge of interlimb coordination assessment in poststroke patients. MDPI 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8914666/ /pubmed/35271155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22052010 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Couto, Ana G. B. Vaz, Mário A. P. Pinho, Liliana Félix, José Silva, Sandra Silva, Augusta Sousa, Andreia S. P. Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes |
title | Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes |
title_full | Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes |
title_short | Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes |
title_sort | methodological considerations in assessing interlimb coordination on poststroke gait: a scoping review of biomechanical approaches and outcomes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271155 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22052010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coutoanagb methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes AT vazmarioap methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes AT pinholiliana methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes AT felixjose methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes AT silvasandra methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes AT silvaaugusta methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes AT sousaandreiasp methodologicalconsiderationsinassessinginterlimbcoordinationonpoststrokegaitascopingreviewofbiomechanicalapproachesandoutcomes |