Cargando…

Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study

The analysis of human gait is an important tool in medicine and rehabilitation to evaluate the effects and the progression of neurological diseases resulting in neuromotor disorders. In these fields, the gold standard techniques adopted to perform gait analysis rely on motion capture systems and mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moro, Matteo, Marchesi, Giorgia, Hesse, Filip, Odone, Francesca, Casadio, Maura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22052011
_version_ 1784667815684341760
author Moro, Matteo
Marchesi, Giorgia
Hesse, Filip
Odone, Francesca
Casadio, Maura
author_facet Moro, Matteo
Marchesi, Giorgia
Hesse, Filip
Odone, Francesca
Casadio, Maura
author_sort Moro, Matteo
collection PubMed
description The analysis of human gait is an important tool in medicine and rehabilitation to evaluate the effects and the progression of neurological diseases resulting in neuromotor disorders. In these fields, the gold standard techniques adopted to perform gait analysis rely on motion capture systems and markers. However, these systems present drawbacks: they are expensive, time consuming and they can affect the naturalness of the motion. For these reasons, in the last few years, considerable effort has been spent to study and implement markerless systems based on videography for gait analysis. Unfortunately, only few studies quantitatively compare the differences between markerless and marker-based systems in 3D settings. This work presented a new RGB video-based markerless system leveraging computer vision and deep learning to perform 3D gait analysis. These results were compared with those obtained by a marker-based motion capture system. To this end, we acquired simultaneously with the two systems a multimodal dataset of 16 people repeatedly walking in an indoor environment. With the two methods we obtained similar spatio-temporal parameters. The joint angles were comparable, except for a slight underestimation of the maximum flexion for ankle and knee angles. Taking together these results highlighted the possibility to adopt markerless technique for gait analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8914751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89147512022-03-12 Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study Moro, Matteo Marchesi, Giorgia Hesse, Filip Odone, Francesca Casadio, Maura Sensors (Basel) Article The analysis of human gait is an important tool in medicine and rehabilitation to evaluate the effects and the progression of neurological diseases resulting in neuromotor disorders. In these fields, the gold standard techniques adopted to perform gait analysis rely on motion capture systems and markers. However, these systems present drawbacks: they are expensive, time consuming and they can affect the naturalness of the motion. For these reasons, in the last few years, considerable effort has been spent to study and implement markerless systems based on videography for gait analysis. Unfortunately, only few studies quantitatively compare the differences between markerless and marker-based systems in 3D settings. This work presented a new RGB video-based markerless system leveraging computer vision and deep learning to perform 3D gait analysis. These results were compared with those obtained by a marker-based motion capture system. To this end, we acquired simultaneously with the two systems a multimodal dataset of 16 people repeatedly walking in an indoor environment. With the two methods we obtained similar spatio-temporal parameters. The joint angles were comparable, except for a slight underestimation of the maximum flexion for ankle and knee angles. Taking together these results highlighted the possibility to adopt markerless technique for gait analysis. MDPI 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8914751/ /pubmed/35271158 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22052011 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moro, Matteo
Marchesi, Giorgia
Hesse, Filip
Odone, Francesca
Casadio, Maura
Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study
title Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study
title_full Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study
title_fullStr Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study
title_full_unstemmed Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study
title_short Markerless vs. Marker-Based Gait Analysis: A Proof of Concept Study
title_sort markerless vs. marker-based gait analysis: a proof of concept study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35271158
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22052011
work_keys_str_mv AT moromatteo markerlessvsmarkerbasedgaitanalysisaproofofconceptstudy
AT marchesigiorgia markerlessvsmarkerbasedgaitanalysisaproofofconceptstudy
AT hessefilip markerlessvsmarkerbasedgaitanalysisaproofofconceptstudy
AT odonefrancesca markerlessvsmarkerbasedgaitanalysisaproofofconceptstudy
AT casadiomaura markerlessvsmarkerbasedgaitanalysisaproofofconceptstudy