Cargando…
The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a unique polymer material which has recently been introduced to dentistry. This study aimed to assess the structural integrity of PEEK as a posterior tooth crown and compared it with ceramic-based material. A total of 31 monolithic CAD-CAM PEEK (Juvora(TM), Strumann, A...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051001 |
_version_ | 1784667816752840704 |
---|---|
author | Aldhuwayhi, Sami Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq Martin, Nicolas |
author_facet | Aldhuwayhi, Sami Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq Martin, Nicolas |
author_sort | Aldhuwayhi, Sami |
collection | PubMed |
description | Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a unique polymer material which has recently been introduced to dentistry. This study aimed to assess the structural integrity of PEEK as a posterior tooth crown and compared it with ceramic-based material. A total of 31 monolithic CAD-CAM PEEK (Juvora(TM), Strumann, Andover, MA, USA) crowns and 31 lithium disilicate (IPS e.max(®)CAD, Voclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein) crowns were created and cemented on dentin-like teeth (AlphaDie(®)MF, Schütz Dental GmbH, Rosbach, Germany) in a precise procedure mimicking the physical and mechanical properties of natural teeth and periodontal ligaments. A static compressive strength test using a universal testing machine and a dynamic fatigue test using a chewing simulator machine were used until crown failure to assess the fracture behaviour by mode of fracture (fractographic analysis) and 3D digital subtraction analysis. The results showed that PEEK has a greater fracture resistance than IPS e.max(®)CAD by 2060 N to 703 N. Additionally, in fatigue limit, IPS e.max(®)CAD showed a constant failure under 2.0 Kg (=320 N) before 5000 chewing cycles while PEEK survived at a significantly higher load > 11 Kg (930 N). Furthermore, PEEK showed a continued survival at >1,250,000 cycles while the mean fatigue life of IPS e.max(®)CAD was around 133,470 cycles. PEEK illustrated a significantly less catastrophic failure mode with some plastic deformation at the fractographic stereomicroscope and in the 3D digital subtraction analysis. Using PEEK for crowns looks very promising, however, further clinical studies are required to assure this study’s results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8914752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89147522022-03-12 The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns Aldhuwayhi, Sami Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq Martin, Nicolas Polymers (Basel) Article Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a unique polymer material which has recently been introduced to dentistry. This study aimed to assess the structural integrity of PEEK as a posterior tooth crown and compared it with ceramic-based material. A total of 31 monolithic CAD-CAM PEEK (Juvora(TM), Strumann, Andover, MA, USA) crowns and 31 lithium disilicate (IPS e.max(®)CAD, Voclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein) crowns were created and cemented on dentin-like teeth (AlphaDie(®)MF, Schütz Dental GmbH, Rosbach, Germany) in a precise procedure mimicking the physical and mechanical properties of natural teeth and periodontal ligaments. A static compressive strength test using a universal testing machine and a dynamic fatigue test using a chewing simulator machine were used until crown failure to assess the fracture behaviour by mode of fracture (fractographic analysis) and 3D digital subtraction analysis. The results showed that PEEK has a greater fracture resistance than IPS e.max(®)CAD by 2060 N to 703 N. Additionally, in fatigue limit, IPS e.max(®)CAD showed a constant failure under 2.0 Kg (=320 N) before 5000 chewing cycles while PEEK survived at a significantly higher load > 11 Kg (930 N). Furthermore, PEEK showed a continued survival at >1,250,000 cycles while the mean fatigue life of IPS e.max(®)CAD was around 133,470 cycles. PEEK illustrated a significantly less catastrophic failure mode with some plastic deformation at the fractographic stereomicroscope and in the 3D digital subtraction analysis. Using PEEK for crowns looks very promising, however, further clinical studies are required to assure this study’s results. MDPI 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8914752/ /pubmed/35267824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051001 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Aldhuwayhi, Sami Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq Martin, Nicolas The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns |
title | The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns |
title_full | The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns |
title_fullStr | The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns |
title_full_unstemmed | The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns |
title_short | The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns |
title_sort | structural integrity and fracture behaviour of teeth restored with peek and lithium-disilicate glass ceramic crowns |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aldhuwayhisami thestructuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns AT alauddinmuhammadsyafiq thestructuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns AT martinnicolas thestructuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns AT aldhuwayhisami structuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns AT alauddinmuhammadsyafiq structuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns AT martinnicolas structuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns |