Cargando…

The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a unique polymer material which has recently been introduced to dentistry. This study aimed to assess the structural integrity of PEEK as a posterior tooth crown and compared it with ceramic-based material. A total of 31 monolithic CAD-CAM PEEK (Juvora(TM), Strumann, A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldhuwayhi, Sami, Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq, Martin, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051001
_version_ 1784667816752840704
author Aldhuwayhi, Sami
Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq
Martin, Nicolas
author_facet Aldhuwayhi, Sami
Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq
Martin, Nicolas
author_sort Aldhuwayhi, Sami
collection PubMed
description Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a unique polymer material which has recently been introduced to dentistry. This study aimed to assess the structural integrity of PEEK as a posterior tooth crown and compared it with ceramic-based material. A total of 31 monolithic CAD-CAM PEEK (Juvora(TM), Strumann, Andover, MA, USA) crowns and 31 lithium disilicate (IPS e.max(®)CAD, Voclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein) crowns were created and cemented on dentin-like teeth (AlphaDie(®)MF, Schütz Dental GmbH, Rosbach, Germany) in a precise procedure mimicking the physical and mechanical properties of natural teeth and periodontal ligaments. A static compressive strength test using a universal testing machine and a dynamic fatigue test using a chewing simulator machine were used until crown failure to assess the fracture behaviour by mode of fracture (fractographic analysis) and 3D digital subtraction analysis. The results showed that PEEK has a greater fracture resistance than IPS e.max(®)CAD by 2060 N to 703 N. Additionally, in fatigue limit, IPS e.max(®)CAD showed a constant failure under 2.0 Kg (=320 N) before 5000 chewing cycles while PEEK survived at a significantly higher load > 11 Kg (930 N). Furthermore, PEEK showed a continued survival at >1,250,000 cycles while the mean fatigue life of IPS e.max(®)CAD was around 133,470 cycles. PEEK illustrated a significantly less catastrophic failure mode with some plastic deformation at the fractographic stereomicroscope and in the 3D digital subtraction analysis. Using PEEK for crowns looks very promising, however, further clinical studies are required to assure this study’s results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8914752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89147522022-03-12 The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns Aldhuwayhi, Sami Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq Martin, Nicolas Polymers (Basel) Article Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a unique polymer material which has recently been introduced to dentistry. This study aimed to assess the structural integrity of PEEK as a posterior tooth crown and compared it with ceramic-based material. A total of 31 monolithic CAD-CAM PEEK (Juvora(TM), Strumann, Andover, MA, USA) crowns and 31 lithium disilicate (IPS e.max(®)CAD, Voclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein) crowns were created and cemented on dentin-like teeth (AlphaDie(®)MF, Schütz Dental GmbH, Rosbach, Germany) in a precise procedure mimicking the physical and mechanical properties of natural teeth and periodontal ligaments. A static compressive strength test using a universal testing machine and a dynamic fatigue test using a chewing simulator machine were used until crown failure to assess the fracture behaviour by mode of fracture (fractographic analysis) and 3D digital subtraction analysis. The results showed that PEEK has a greater fracture resistance than IPS e.max(®)CAD by 2060 N to 703 N. Additionally, in fatigue limit, IPS e.max(®)CAD showed a constant failure under 2.0 Kg (=320 N) before 5000 chewing cycles while PEEK survived at a significantly higher load > 11 Kg (930 N). Furthermore, PEEK showed a continued survival at >1,250,000 cycles while the mean fatigue life of IPS e.max(®)CAD was around 133,470 cycles. PEEK illustrated a significantly less catastrophic failure mode with some plastic deformation at the fractographic stereomicroscope and in the 3D digital subtraction analysis. Using PEEK for crowns looks very promising, however, further clinical studies are required to assure this study’s results. MDPI 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8914752/ /pubmed/35267824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051001 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aldhuwayhi, Sami
Alauddin, Muhammad Syafiq
Martin, Nicolas
The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
title The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
title_full The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
title_fullStr The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
title_full_unstemmed The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
title_short The Structural Integrity and Fracture Behaviour of Teeth Restored with PEEK and Lithium-Disilicate Glass Ceramic Crowns
title_sort structural integrity and fracture behaviour of teeth restored with peek and lithium-disilicate glass ceramic crowns
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35267824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14051001
work_keys_str_mv AT aldhuwayhisami thestructuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns
AT alauddinmuhammadsyafiq thestructuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns
AT martinnicolas thestructuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns
AT aldhuwayhisami structuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns
AT alauddinmuhammadsyafiq structuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns
AT martinnicolas structuralintegrityandfracturebehaviourofteethrestoredwithpeekandlithiumdisilicateglassceramiccrowns