Cargando…

Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: e-Learning for health professionals in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is still in its infancy, but with the advent of COVID-19, a significant expansion of digital learning has occurred. Asynchronous e-learning can be grouped into interactive (user-influenceable content) an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnieders, Elena, Röhr, Freda, Mbewe, Misho, Shanzi, Aubrey, Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid, Barteit, Sandra, Louis, Valérie R, Andreadis, Petros, Syakantu, Gardner, Neuhann, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34751
_version_ 1784667818036297728
author Schnieders, Elena
Röhr, Freda
Mbewe, Misho
Shanzi, Aubrey
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
Barteit, Sandra
Louis, Valérie R
Andreadis, Petros
Syakantu, Gardner
Neuhann, Florian
author_facet Schnieders, Elena
Röhr, Freda
Mbewe, Misho
Shanzi, Aubrey
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
Barteit, Sandra
Louis, Valérie R
Andreadis, Petros
Syakantu, Gardner
Neuhann, Florian
author_sort Schnieders, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: e-Learning for health professionals in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is still in its infancy, but with the advent of COVID-19, a significant expansion of digital learning has occurred. Asynchronous e-learning can be grouped into interactive (user-influenceable content) and noninteractive (static material) e-learning. Studies conducted in high-income countries suggest that interactive e-learning is more effective than noninteractive e-learning in increasing learner satisfaction and knowledge; however, there is a gap in our understanding of whether this also holds true in LMICs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to validate the hypothesis above in a resource-constrained and real-life setting to understand e-learning quality and delivery by comparing interactive and noninteractive e-learning user satisfaction, usability, and knowledge gain in a new medical university in Zambia. METHODS: We conducted a web-based, mixed methods randomized controlled trial at the Levy Mwanawasa Medical University (LMMU) in Lusaka, Zambia, between April and July 2021. We recruited medical licentiate students (second, third, and fourth study years) via email. Participants were randomized to undergo asynchronous e-learning with an interactive or noninteractive module for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and informally blinded to their group allocation. The interactive module included interactive interfaces, quizzes, and a virtual patient, whereas the noninteractive module consisted of PowerPoint slides. Both modules covered the same content scope. The primary outcome was learner satisfaction. The secondary outcomes were usability, short- and long-term knowledge gain, and barriers to e-learning. The mixed methods study followed an explanatory sequential design in which rating conferences delivered further insights into quantitative findings, which were evaluated through web-based questionnaires. RESULTS: Initially, 94 participants were enrolled in the study, of whom 41 (44%; 18 intervention participants and 23 control participants) remained in the study and were analyzed. There were no significant differences in satisfaction (intervention: median 33.5, first quartile 31.3, second quartile 35; control: median 33, first quartile 30, second quartile 37.5; P=.66), usability, or knowledge gain between the intervention and control groups. Challenges in accessing both e-learning modules led to many dropouts. Qualitative data suggested that the content of the interactive module was more challenging to access because of technical difficulties and individual factors (eg, limited experience with interactive e-learning). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in user satisfaction with interactive e-learning. However, this finding may not be generalizable to other low-resource settings because the post hoc power was low, and the e-learning system at LMMU has not yet reached its full potential. Consequently, technical and individual barriers to accessing e-learning may have affected the results, mainly because the interactive module was considered more difficult to access and use. Nevertheless, qualitative data showed high motivation and interest in e-learning. Future studies should minimize technical barriers to e-learning to further evaluate interactive e-learning in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8914755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89147552022-03-12 Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial Schnieders, Elena Röhr, Freda Mbewe, Misho Shanzi, Aubrey Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid Barteit, Sandra Louis, Valérie R Andreadis, Petros Syakantu, Gardner Neuhann, Florian JMIR Med Educ Original Paper BACKGROUND: e-Learning for health professionals in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is still in its infancy, but with the advent of COVID-19, a significant expansion of digital learning has occurred. Asynchronous e-learning can be grouped into interactive (user-influenceable content) and noninteractive (static material) e-learning. Studies conducted in high-income countries suggest that interactive e-learning is more effective than noninteractive e-learning in increasing learner satisfaction and knowledge; however, there is a gap in our understanding of whether this also holds true in LMICs. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to validate the hypothesis above in a resource-constrained and real-life setting to understand e-learning quality and delivery by comparing interactive and noninteractive e-learning user satisfaction, usability, and knowledge gain in a new medical university in Zambia. METHODS: We conducted a web-based, mixed methods randomized controlled trial at the Levy Mwanawasa Medical University (LMMU) in Lusaka, Zambia, between April and July 2021. We recruited medical licentiate students (second, third, and fourth study years) via email. Participants were randomized to undergo asynchronous e-learning with an interactive or noninteractive module for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and informally blinded to their group allocation. The interactive module included interactive interfaces, quizzes, and a virtual patient, whereas the noninteractive module consisted of PowerPoint slides. Both modules covered the same content scope. The primary outcome was learner satisfaction. The secondary outcomes were usability, short- and long-term knowledge gain, and barriers to e-learning. The mixed methods study followed an explanatory sequential design in which rating conferences delivered further insights into quantitative findings, which were evaluated through web-based questionnaires. RESULTS: Initially, 94 participants were enrolled in the study, of whom 41 (44%; 18 intervention participants and 23 control participants) remained in the study and were analyzed. There were no significant differences in satisfaction (intervention: median 33.5, first quartile 31.3, second quartile 35; control: median 33, first quartile 30, second quartile 37.5; P=.66), usability, or knowledge gain between the intervention and control groups. Challenges in accessing both e-learning modules led to many dropouts. Qualitative data suggested that the content of the interactive module was more challenging to access because of technical difficulties and individual factors (eg, limited experience with interactive e-learning). CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe an increase in user satisfaction with interactive e-learning. However, this finding may not be generalizable to other low-resource settings because the post hoc power was low, and the e-learning system at LMMU has not yet reached its full potential. Consequently, technical and individual barriers to accessing e-learning may have affected the results, mainly because the interactive module was considered more difficult to access and use. Nevertheless, qualitative data showed high motivation and interest in e-learning. Future studies should minimize technical barriers to e-learning to further evaluate interactive e-learning in LMICs. JMIR Publications 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8914755/ /pubmed/35200149 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34751 Text en ©Elena Schnieders, Freda Röhr, Misho Mbewe, Aubrey Shanzi, Astrid Berner-Rodoreda, Sandra Barteit, Valérie R Louis, Petros Andreadis, Gardner Syakantu, Florian Neuhann. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 24.02.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Schnieders, Elena
Röhr, Freda
Mbewe, Misho
Shanzi, Aubrey
Berner-Rodoreda, Astrid
Barteit, Sandra
Louis, Valérie R
Andreadis, Petros
Syakantu, Gardner
Neuhann, Florian
Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
title Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Real-life Evaluation of an Interactive Versus Noninteractive e-Learning Module on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease for Medical Licentiate Students in Zambia: Web-Based, Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort real-life evaluation of an interactive versus noninteractive e-learning module on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for medical licentiate students in zambia: web-based, mixed methods randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200149
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34751
work_keys_str_mv AT schniederselena reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rohrfreda reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mbewemisho reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shanziaubrey reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bernerrodoredaastrid reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT barteitsandra reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT louisvalerier reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT andreadispetros reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT syakantugardner reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT neuhannflorian reallifeevaluationofaninteractiveversusnoninteractiveelearningmoduleonchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseformedicallicentiatestudentsinzambiawebbasedmixedmethodsrandomizedcontrolledtrial