Cargando…

The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology

Road traffic collisions are a major cause of traumatic brain injury. However, the relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury risk for different road users is unknown. We investigated 2065 collisions from Great Britain’s Road Accident In-depth Studies collision da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Claire E., Martin, Phil, Wilson, Mark H., Ghajari, Mazdak, Sharp, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac033
_version_ 1784667862198124544
author Baker, Claire E.
Martin, Phil
Wilson, Mark H.
Ghajari, Mazdak
Sharp, David J.
author_facet Baker, Claire E.
Martin, Phil
Wilson, Mark H.
Ghajari, Mazdak
Sharp, David J.
author_sort Baker, Claire E.
collection PubMed
description Road traffic collisions are a major cause of traumatic brain injury. However, the relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury risk for different road users is unknown. We investigated 2065 collisions from Great Britain’s Road Accident In-depth Studies collision database involving 5374 subjects (2013–20). Five hundred and ninety-five subjects sustained a traumatic brain injury (20.2% of 2940 casualties), including 315 moderate–severe and 133 mild–probable injuries. Key pathologies included skull fracture (179, 31.9%), subarachnoid haemorrhage (171, 30.5%), focal brain injury (168, 29.9%) and subdural haematoma (96, 17.1%). These results were extended nationally using >1 000 000 police-reported collision casualties. Extrapolating from the in-depth data we estimate that there are ∼20 000 traumatic brain injury casualties (∼5000 moderate–severe) annually on Great Britain’s roads, accounting for severity differences. Detailed collision investigation allows vehicle collision dynamics to be understood and the change in velocity (known as delta-V) to be estimated for a subset of in-depth collision data. Higher delta-V increased the risk of moderate–severe brain injury for all road users. The four key pathologies were not observed below 8 km/h delta-V for pedestrians/cyclists and 19 km/h delta-V for car occupants (higher delta-V threshold for focal injury in both groups). Traumatic brain injury risk depended on road user type, delta-V and impact direction. Accounting for delta-V, pedestrians/cyclists had a 6-times higher likelihood of moderate–severe brain injury than car occupants. Wearing a cycle helmet during a collision was protective against overall and mild-to-moderate-to-severe brain injury, particularly skull fracture and subdural haematoma. Cycle helmet protection was not due to travel or impact speed differences between helmeted and non-helmeted cyclist groups. We additionally examined the influence of the delta-V direction. Car occupants exposed to a higher lateral delta-V component had a greater prevalence of moderate–severe brain injury, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage. Multivariate logistic regression models created using total delta-V value and whether lateral delta-V was dominant had the best prediction capabilities (area under the receiver operator curve as high as 0.95). Collision notification systems are routinely fitted in new cars. These record delta-V and automatically alert emergency services to a collision in real-time. These risk relationships could, therefore, inform how routinely fitted automatic collision notification systems alert the emergency services to collisions with a high brain injury risk. Early notification of high-risk scenarios would enable quicker activation of the highest level of emergency service response. Identifying those that require neurosurgical care and ensuring they are transported directly to a centre with neuro-specialist provisions could improve patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8914876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89148762022-03-14 The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology Baker, Claire E. Martin, Phil Wilson, Mark H. Ghajari, Mazdak Sharp, David J. Brain Commun Original Article Road traffic collisions are a major cause of traumatic brain injury. However, the relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury risk for different road users is unknown. We investigated 2065 collisions from Great Britain’s Road Accident In-depth Studies collision database involving 5374 subjects (2013–20). Five hundred and ninety-five subjects sustained a traumatic brain injury (20.2% of 2940 casualties), including 315 moderate–severe and 133 mild–probable injuries. Key pathologies included skull fracture (179, 31.9%), subarachnoid haemorrhage (171, 30.5%), focal brain injury (168, 29.9%) and subdural haematoma (96, 17.1%). These results were extended nationally using >1 000 000 police-reported collision casualties. Extrapolating from the in-depth data we estimate that there are ∼20 000 traumatic brain injury casualties (∼5000 moderate–severe) annually on Great Britain’s roads, accounting for severity differences. Detailed collision investigation allows vehicle collision dynamics to be understood and the change in velocity (known as delta-V) to be estimated for a subset of in-depth collision data. Higher delta-V increased the risk of moderate–severe brain injury for all road users. The four key pathologies were not observed below 8 km/h delta-V for pedestrians/cyclists and 19 km/h delta-V for car occupants (higher delta-V threshold for focal injury in both groups). Traumatic brain injury risk depended on road user type, delta-V and impact direction. Accounting for delta-V, pedestrians/cyclists had a 6-times higher likelihood of moderate–severe brain injury than car occupants. Wearing a cycle helmet during a collision was protective against overall and mild-to-moderate-to-severe brain injury, particularly skull fracture and subdural haematoma. Cycle helmet protection was not due to travel or impact speed differences between helmeted and non-helmeted cyclist groups. We additionally examined the influence of the delta-V direction. Car occupants exposed to a higher lateral delta-V component had a greater prevalence of moderate–severe brain injury, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage. Multivariate logistic regression models created using total delta-V value and whether lateral delta-V was dominant had the best prediction capabilities (area under the receiver operator curve as high as 0.95). Collision notification systems are routinely fitted in new cars. These record delta-V and automatically alert emergency services to a collision in real-time. These risk relationships could, therefore, inform how routinely fitted automatic collision notification systems alert the emergency services to collisions with a high brain injury risk. Early notification of high-risk scenarios would enable quicker activation of the highest level of emergency service response. Identifying those that require neurosurgical care and ensuring they are transported directly to a centre with neuro-specialist provisions could improve patient outcomes. Oxford University Press 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8914876/ /pubmed/35291690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac033 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baker, Claire E.
Martin, Phil
Wilson, Mark H.
Ghajari, Mazdak
Sharp, David J.
The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
title The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
title_full The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
title_fullStr The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
title_short The relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
title_sort relationship between road traffic collision dynamics and traumatic brain injury pathology
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35291690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac033
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerclairee therelationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT martinphil therelationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT wilsonmarkh therelationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT ghajarimazdak therelationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT sharpdavidj therelationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT bakerclairee relationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT martinphil relationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT wilsonmarkh relationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT ghajarimazdak relationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology
AT sharpdavidj relationshipbetweenroadtrafficcollisiondynamicsandtraumaticbraininjurypathology