Cargando…
A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients †
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a safe, effective, and general approach for treating various neurological disorders. However, in the case of FES usage for implantable applications, charge balancing is a significant challenge due to variations in the fabrication process and electrode tissu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051756 |
_version_ | 1784667935762022400 |
---|---|
author | Moganti, Ganesh Lakshmana Kumar Siva Praneeth, V. N. Vanjari, Siva Rama Krishna |
author_facet | Moganti, Ganesh Lakshmana Kumar Siva Praneeth, V. N. Vanjari, Siva Rama Krishna |
author_sort | Moganti, Ganesh Lakshmana Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a safe, effective, and general approach for treating various neurological disorders. However, in the case of FES usage for implantable applications, charge balancing is a significant challenge due to variations in the fabrication process and electrode tissue interface (ETI) impedance. In general, an active charge balancing approach is being used for this purpose, which has limitations of additional power consumption for residual voltage calibration and undesired neurological responses. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents a reconfigurable calibration circuit to address both ETI variations and charge balancing issues. This reconfigurable calibration circuit works in two modes: An impedance measurement mode (IMM) for treating ETI variations and a hybrid charge balancing mode (HCBM) for handling charge balance issues. The IMM predicts the desired stimulation currents by measuring the ETI. The HCBM is a hybrid combination of electrode shorting, offset regulation, and pulse modulation that takes the best features of each of these techniques and applies them in appropriate situations. From the results, it is proved that the proposed IMM configuration and HCBM configuration have an optimal power consumption of less than 44 [Formula: see text] W with a power ratio ranging from 1.74 to 5.5 percent when compared to conventional approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89151092022-03-12 A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † Moganti, Ganesh Lakshmana Kumar Siva Praneeth, V. N. Vanjari, Siva Rama Krishna Sensors (Basel) Article Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a safe, effective, and general approach for treating various neurological disorders. However, in the case of FES usage for implantable applications, charge balancing is a significant challenge due to variations in the fabrication process and electrode tissue interface (ETI) impedance. In general, an active charge balancing approach is being used for this purpose, which has limitations of additional power consumption for residual voltage calibration and undesired neurological responses. To overcome these limitations, this paper presents a reconfigurable calibration circuit to address both ETI variations and charge balancing issues. This reconfigurable calibration circuit works in two modes: An impedance measurement mode (IMM) for treating ETI variations and a hybrid charge balancing mode (HCBM) for handling charge balance issues. The IMM predicts the desired stimulation currents by measuring the ETI. The HCBM is a hybrid combination of electrode shorting, offset regulation, and pulse modulation that takes the best features of each of these techniques and applies them in appropriate situations. From the results, it is proved that the proposed IMM configuration and HCBM configuration have an optimal power consumption of less than 44 [Formula: see text] W with a power ratio ranging from 1.74 to 5.5 percent when compared to conventional approaches. MDPI 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8915109/ /pubmed/35270902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051756 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Moganti, Ganesh Lakshmana Kumar Siva Praneeth, V. N. Vanjari, Siva Rama Krishna A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † |
title | A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † |
title_full | A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † |
title_fullStr | A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † |
title_full_unstemmed | A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † |
title_short | A Hybrid Bipolar Active Charge Balancing Technique with Adaptive Electrode Tissue Interface (ETI) Impedance Variations for Facial Paralysis Patients † |
title_sort | hybrid bipolar active charge balancing technique with adaptive electrode tissue interface (eti) impedance variations for facial paralysis patients † |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270902 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mogantiganeshlakshmanakumar ahybridbipolaractivechargebalancingtechniquewithadaptiveelectrodetissueinterfaceetiimpedancevariationsforfacialparalysispatients AT sivapraneethvn ahybridbipolaractivechargebalancingtechniquewithadaptiveelectrodetissueinterfaceetiimpedancevariationsforfacialparalysispatients AT vanjarisivaramakrishna ahybridbipolaractivechargebalancingtechniquewithadaptiveelectrodetissueinterfaceetiimpedancevariationsforfacialparalysispatients AT mogantiganeshlakshmanakumar hybridbipolaractivechargebalancingtechniquewithadaptiveelectrodetissueinterfaceetiimpedancevariationsforfacialparalysispatients AT sivapraneethvn hybridbipolaractivechargebalancingtechniquewithadaptiveelectrodetissueinterfaceetiimpedancevariationsforfacialparalysispatients AT vanjarisivaramakrishna hybridbipolaractivechargebalancingtechniquewithadaptiveelectrodetissueinterfaceetiimpedancevariationsforfacialparalysispatients |