Cargando…

Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to monitor running biomechanics in real-world settings, but IMUs are often used within a laboratory. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how IMUs are used to record running biomechanics in both laboratory and real-world conditions. We incl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benson, Lauren C., Räisänen, Anu M., Clermont, Christian A., Ferber, Reed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051722
_version_ 1784667942588252160
author Benson, Lauren C.
Räisänen, Anu M.
Clermont, Christian A.
Ferber, Reed
author_facet Benson, Lauren C.
Räisänen, Anu M.
Clermont, Christian A.
Ferber, Reed
author_sort Benson, Lauren C.
collection PubMed
description Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to monitor running biomechanics in real-world settings, but IMUs are often used within a laboratory. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how IMUs are used to record running biomechanics in both laboratory and real-world conditions. We included peer-reviewed journal articles that used IMUs to assess gait quality during running. We extracted data on running conditions (indoor/outdoor, surface, speed, and distance), device type and location, metrics, participants, and purpose and study design. A total of 231 studies were included. Most (72%) studies were conducted indoors; and in 67% of all studies, the analyzed distance was only one step or stride or <200 m. The most common device type and location combination was a triaxial accelerometer on the shank (18% of device and location combinations). The most common analyzed metric was vertical/axial magnitude, which was reported in 64% of all studies. Most studies (56%) included recreational runners. For the past 20 years, studies using IMUs to record running biomechanics have mainly been conducted indoors, on a treadmill, at prescribed speeds, and over small distances. We suggest that future studies should move out of the lab to less controlled and more real-world environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89151282022-03-12 Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis Benson, Lauren C. Räisänen, Anu M. Clermont, Christian A. Ferber, Reed Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to monitor running biomechanics in real-world settings, but IMUs are often used within a laboratory. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how IMUs are used to record running biomechanics in both laboratory and real-world conditions. We included peer-reviewed journal articles that used IMUs to assess gait quality during running. We extracted data on running conditions (indoor/outdoor, surface, speed, and distance), device type and location, metrics, participants, and purpose and study design. A total of 231 studies were included. Most (72%) studies were conducted indoors; and in 67% of all studies, the analyzed distance was only one step or stride or <200 m. The most common device type and location combination was a triaxial accelerometer on the shank (18% of device and location combinations). The most common analyzed metric was vertical/axial magnitude, which was reported in 64% of all studies. Most studies (56%) included recreational runners. For the past 20 years, studies using IMUs to record running biomechanics have mainly been conducted indoors, on a treadmill, at prescribed speeds, and over small distances. We suggest that future studies should move out of the lab to less controlled and more real-world environments. MDPI 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8915128/ /pubmed/35270869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051722 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Benson, Lauren C.
Räisänen, Anu M.
Clermont, Christian A.
Ferber, Reed
Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
title Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
title_full Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
title_fullStr Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
title_short Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
title_sort is this the real life, or is this just laboratory? a scoping review of imu-based running gait analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051722
work_keys_str_mv AT bensonlaurenc isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis
AT raisanenanum isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis
AT clermontchristiana isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis
AT ferberreed isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis