Cargando…
Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to monitor running biomechanics in real-world settings, but IMUs are often used within a laboratory. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how IMUs are used to record running biomechanics in both laboratory and real-world conditions. We incl...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051722 |
_version_ | 1784667942588252160 |
---|---|
author | Benson, Lauren C. Räisänen, Anu M. Clermont, Christian A. Ferber, Reed |
author_facet | Benson, Lauren C. Räisänen, Anu M. Clermont, Christian A. Ferber, Reed |
author_sort | Benson, Lauren C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to monitor running biomechanics in real-world settings, but IMUs are often used within a laboratory. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how IMUs are used to record running biomechanics in both laboratory and real-world conditions. We included peer-reviewed journal articles that used IMUs to assess gait quality during running. We extracted data on running conditions (indoor/outdoor, surface, speed, and distance), device type and location, metrics, participants, and purpose and study design. A total of 231 studies were included. Most (72%) studies were conducted indoors; and in 67% of all studies, the analyzed distance was only one step or stride or <200 m. The most common device type and location combination was a triaxial accelerometer on the shank (18% of device and location combinations). The most common analyzed metric was vertical/axial magnitude, which was reported in 64% of all studies. Most studies (56%) included recreational runners. For the past 20 years, studies using IMUs to record running biomechanics have mainly been conducted indoors, on a treadmill, at prescribed speeds, and over small distances. We suggest that future studies should move out of the lab to less controlled and more real-world environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89151282022-03-12 Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis Benson, Lauren C. Räisänen, Anu M. Clermont, Christian A. Ferber, Reed Sensors (Basel) Systematic Review Inertial measurement units (IMUs) can be used to monitor running biomechanics in real-world settings, but IMUs are often used within a laboratory. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe how IMUs are used to record running biomechanics in both laboratory and real-world conditions. We included peer-reviewed journal articles that used IMUs to assess gait quality during running. We extracted data on running conditions (indoor/outdoor, surface, speed, and distance), device type and location, metrics, participants, and purpose and study design. A total of 231 studies were included. Most (72%) studies were conducted indoors; and in 67% of all studies, the analyzed distance was only one step or stride or <200 m. The most common device type and location combination was a triaxial accelerometer on the shank (18% of device and location combinations). The most common analyzed metric was vertical/axial magnitude, which was reported in 64% of all studies. Most studies (56%) included recreational runners. For the past 20 years, studies using IMUs to record running biomechanics have mainly been conducted indoors, on a treadmill, at prescribed speeds, and over small distances. We suggest that future studies should move out of the lab to less controlled and more real-world environments. MDPI 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8915128/ /pubmed/35270869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051722 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Benson, Lauren C. Räisänen, Anu M. Clermont, Christian A. Ferber, Reed Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis |
title | Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis |
title_full | Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis |
title_fullStr | Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis |
title_short | Is This the Real Life, or Is This Just Laboratory? A Scoping Review of IMU-Based Running Gait Analysis |
title_sort | is this the real life, or is this just laboratory? a scoping review of imu-based running gait analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35270869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22051722 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bensonlaurenc isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis AT raisanenanum isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis AT clermontchristiana isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis AT ferberreed isthisthereallifeoristhisjustlaboratoryascopingreviewofimubasedrunninggaitanalysis |