Cargando…
Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat
The applicant Syngenta Crop Protection AG submitted a request to the competent national authority in Sweden to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for diquat in the framework of the MRL review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. The applicant provided su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35311010 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7186 |
_version_ | 1784667949606371328 |
---|---|
author | Bellisai, Giulia Bernasconi, Giovanni Brancato, Alba Cabrera, Luis Carrasco Castellan, Irene Ferreira, Lucien Giner, German Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Nave, Stefanie Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Santos, Miguel Scarlato, Alessia Pia Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia |
author_facet | Bellisai, Giulia Bernasconi, Giovanni Brancato, Alba Cabrera, Luis Carrasco Castellan, Irene Ferreira, Lucien Giner, German Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Nave, Stefanie Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Santos, Miguel Scarlato, Alessia Pia Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The applicant Syngenta Crop Protection AG submitted a request to the competent national authority in Sweden to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for diquat in the framework of the MRL review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. The applicant provided sufficient data to address the data gaps related to plant metabolism studies and analytical methods for plant and animal products. The data gap requesting further studies to investigate the nature of residues of diquat and its metabolite TOPPS in processed products was not sufficiently addressed. Considering the new studies submitted under the current application and considering that the EU uses for diquat had to be withdrawn following a decision on non‐approval, EFSA proposed the lowering of the existing MRLs to the appropriate limit of quantifications for the commodities under assessment. In addition, EFSA proposed to perform a more comprehensive review of the existing MRLs that were not subject to the current assessment, taking into account the findings and conclusions of the peer review, the consequences of the non‐approval decision and the revisions of Codex MRLs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89151542022-03-18 Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat Bellisai, Giulia Bernasconi, Giovanni Brancato, Alba Cabrera, Luis Carrasco Castellan, Irene Ferreira, Lucien Giner, German Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Nave, Stefanie Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Santos, Miguel Scarlato, Alessia Pia Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia EFSA J Scientific Opinion The applicant Syngenta Crop Protection AG submitted a request to the competent national authority in Sweden to evaluate the confirmatory data that were identified for diquat in the framework of the MRL review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 as not available. The applicant provided sufficient data to address the data gaps related to plant metabolism studies and analytical methods for plant and animal products. The data gap requesting further studies to investigate the nature of residues of diquat and its metabolite TOPPS in processed products was not sufficiently addressed. Considering the new studies submitted under the current application and considering that the EU uses for diquat had to be withdrawn following a decision on non‐approval, EFSA proposed the lowering of the existing MRLs to the appropriate limit of quantifications for the commodities under assessment. In addition, EFSA proposed to perform a more comprehensive review of the existing MRLs that were not subject to the current assessment, taking into account the findings and conclusions of the peer review, the consequences of the non‐approval decision and the revisions of Codex MRLs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8915154/ /pubmed/35311010 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7186 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Bellisai, Giulia Bernasconi, Giovanni Brancato, Alba Cabrera, Luis Carrasco Castellan, Irene Ferreira, Lucien Giner, German Greco, Luna Jarrah, Samira Leuschner, Renata Magrans, Jose Oriol Miron, Ileana Nave, Stefanie Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Ruocco, Silvia Santos, Miguel Scarlato, Alessia Pia Theobald, Anne Verani, Alessia Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat |
title | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat |
title_full | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat |
title_short | Evaluation of confirmatory data following the Article 12 MRL review for diquat |
title_sort | evaluation of confirmatory data following the article 12 mrl review for diquat |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35311010 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT bellisaigiulia evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT bernasconigiovanni evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT brancatoalba evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT cabreraluiscarrasco evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT castellanirene evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT ferreiralucien evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT ginergerman evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT grecoluna evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT jarrahsamira evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT leuschnerrenata evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT magransjoseoriol evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT mironileana evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT navestefanie evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT pedersenragnor evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT reichhermine evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT ruoccosilvia evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT santosmiguel evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT scarlatoalessiapia evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT theobaldanne evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat AT veranialessia evaluationofconfirmatorydatafollowingthearticle12mrlreviewfordiquat |