Cargando…

Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany

Established methods of recruiting population controls for case–control studies in infectious disease outbreak investigations are resource- and time-intensive, and are often subject to bias. The online panel have recently gained interest as an easy and timely method to select controls. We examined th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perriat, Delphine, Mertens, Elke, Dreesman, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002594
_version_ 1784667961237176320
author Perriat, Delphine
Mertens, Elke
Dreesman, Johannes
author_facet Perriat, Delphine
Mertens, Elke
Dreesman, Johannes
author_sort Perriat, Delphine
collection PubMed
description Established methods of recruiting population controls for case–control studies in infectious disease outbreak investigations are resource- and time-intensive, and are often subject to bias. The online panel have recently gained interest as an easy and timely method to select controls. We examined the feasibility, suitability and reliability of using an online panel to select controls for case–control studies as part of investigations of diffuse food and waterborne outbreaks. In January 2019, we deployed a web survey by email to the 277 members of a non-probabilistic online panel in Lower Saxony, Germany. We questioned them on basic sociodemographic characteristics and eating habits. They were frequency matched to cases on sex and age. Their food exposures were compared to those of traditionally recruited controls of four historical case–controls studies, which successfully investigated food and waterborne outbreaks. We used logistic regressions to assess the association between the food exposures and the disease (odds ratios). The use of a control panel successfully led to the identification of the food items in three of the four historical outbreak investigations, and their recruitment benefitted from increased speed and limited costs. Timely outbreak investigations would enable rapidly implementing control measures. We recommend the further evaluation of using panellists as controls in parallel case–control studies and case–panel studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89151932022-03-21 Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany Perriat, Delphine Mertens, Elke Dreesman, Johannes Epidemiol Infect Original Paper Established methods of recruiting population controls for case–control studies in infectious disease outbreak investigations are resource- and time-intensive, and are often subject to bias. The online panel have recently gained interest as an easy and timely method to select controls. We examined the feasibility, suitability and reliability of using an online panel to select controls for case–control studies as part of investigations of diffuse food and waterborne outbreaks. In January 2019, we deployed a web survey by email to the 277 members of a non-probabilistic online panel in Lower Saxony, Germany. We questioned them on basic sociodemographic characteristics and eating habits. They were frequency matched to cases on sex and age. Their food exposures were compared to those of traditionally recruited controls of four historical case–controls studies, which successfully investigated food and waterborne outbreaks. We used logistic regressions to assess the association between the food exposures and the disease (odds ratios). The use of a control panel successfully led to the identification of the food items in three of the four historical outbreak investigations, and their recruitment benefitted from increased speed and limited costs. Timely outbreak investigations would enable rapidly implementing control measures. We recommend the further evaluation of using panellists as controls in parallel case–control studies and case–panel studies. Cambridge University Press 2022-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8915193/ /pubmed/34991764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002594 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Perriat, Delphine
Mertens, Elke
Dreesman, Johannes
Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany
title Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany
title_full Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany
title_fullStr Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany
title_full_unstemmed Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany
title_short Use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in Lower Saxony, Germany
title_sort use of a non-probabilistic online panel as a control group for case–control studies to investigate food and waterborne outbreaks in lower saxony, germany
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34991764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002594
work_keys_str_mv AT perriatdelphine useofanonprobabilisticonlinepanelasacontrolgroupforcasecontrolstudiestoinvestigatefoodandwaterborneoutbreaksinlowersaxonygermany
AT mertenselke useofanonprobabilisticonlinepanelasacontrolgroupforcasecontrolstudiestoinvestigatefoodandwaterborneoutbreaksinlowersaxonygermany
AT dreesmanjohannes useofanonprobabilisticonlinepanelasacontrolgroupforcasecontrolstudiestoinvestigatefoodandwaterborneoutbreaksinlowersaxonygermany