Cargando…

Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone

INTRODUCTION: Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) includes invasive monitoring to prevent secondary brain injuries. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is the main measurement used to that intent but cerebral hypoxia can occur despite normal ICP. This study will assess whether the addition of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernard, Francis, Barsan, William, Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon, Merck, Lisa H, Yeatts, Sharon, Shutter, Lori A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060188
_version_ 1784667985003151360
author Bernard, Francis
Barsan, William
Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
Merck, Lisa H
Yeatts, Sharon
Shutter, Lori A
author_facet Bernard, Francis
Barsan, William
Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
Merck, Lisa H
Yeatts, Sharon
Shutter, Lori A
author_sort Bernard, Francis
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) includes invasive monitoring to prevent secondary brain injuries. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is the main measurement used to that intent but cerebral hypoxia can occur despite normal ICP. This study will assess whether the addition of a brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO(2)) monitor prevents more secondary injuries that will translate into improved functional outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint comparative effectiveness study enrolling 1094 patients with severe TBI monitored with both ICP and PbtO(2). Patients will be randomised to medical management guided by ICP alone (treating team blinded to PbtO(2) values) or both ICP and PbtO(2). Management is protocolised according to international guidelines in a tiered approach fashion to maintain ICP <22 mm Hg and PbtO(2) >20 mm Hg. ICP and PbtO(2) will be continuously recorded for a minimum of 5 days. The primary outcome measure is the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended performed at 180 (±30) days by a blinded central examiner. Favourable outcome is defined according to a sliding dichotomy where the definition of favourable outcome varies according to baseline severity. Severity will be defined according to the probability of poor outcome predicted by the IMPACT core model. A large battery of secondary outcomes including granular neuropsychological and quality of life measures will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This has been approved by Advarra Ethics Committee (Pro00030585). Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03754114).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89152892022-03-25 Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone Bernard, Francis Barsan, William Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon Merck, Lisa H Yeatts, Sharon Shutter, Lori A BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Management of traumatic brain injury (TBI) includes invasive monitoring to prevent secondary brain injuries. Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor is the main measurement used to that intent but cerebral hypoxia can occur despite normal ICP. This study will assess whether the addition of a brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO(2)) monitor prevents more secondary injuries that will translate into improved functional outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint comparative effectiveness study enrolling 1094 patients with severe TBI monitored with both ICP and PbtO(2). Patients will be randomised to medical management guided by ICP alone (treating team blinded to PbtO(2) values) or both ICP and PbtO(2). Management is protocolised according to international guidelines in a tiered approach fashion to maintain ICP <22 mm Hg and PbtO(2) >20 mm Hg. ICP and PbtO(2) will be continuously recorded for a minimum of 5 days. The primary outcome measure is the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended performed at 180 (±30) days by a blinded central examiner. Favourable outcome is defined according to a sliding dichotomy where the definition of favourable outcome varies according to baseline severity. Severity will be defined according to the probability of poor outcome predicted by the IMPACT core model. A large battery of secondary outcomes including granular neuropsychological and quality of life measures will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This has been approved by Advarra Ethics Committee (Pro00030585). Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03754114). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8915289/ /pubmed/35273066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060188 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Bernard, Francis
Barsan, William
Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
Merck, Lisa H
Yeatts, Sharon
Shutter, Lori A
Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
title Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
title_full Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
title_fullStr Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
title_full_unstemmed Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
title_short Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
title_sort brain oxygen optimization in severe traumatic brain injury (boost-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060188
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardfrancis brainoxygenoptimizationinseveretraumaticbraininjuryboost3amulticentrerandomisedblindedendpointcomparativeeffectivenessstudyofbraintissueoxygenandintracranialpressuremonitoringversusintracranialpressurealone
AT barsanwilliam brainoxygenoptimizationinseveretraumaticbraininjuryboost3amulticentrerandomisedblindedendpointcomparativeeffectivenessstudyofbraintissueoxygenandintracranialpressuremonitoringversusintracranialpressurealone
AT diazarrastiaramon brainoxygenoptimizationinseveretraumaticbraininjuryboost3amulticentrerandomisedblindedendpointcomparativeeffectivenessstudyofbraintissueoxygenandintracranialpressuremonitoringversusintracranialpressurealone
AT mercklisah brainoxygenoptimizationinseveretraumaticbraininjuryboost3amulticentrerandomisedblindedendpointcomparativeeffectivenessstudyofbraintissueoxygenandintracranialpressuremonitoringversusintracranialpressurealone
AT yeattssharon brainoxygenoptimizationinseveretraumaticbraininjuryboost3amulticentrerandomisedblindedendpointcomparativeeffectivenessstudyofbraintissueoxygenandintracranialpressuremonitoringversusintracranialpressurealone
AT shutterloria brainoxygenoptimizationinseveretraumaticbraininjuryboost3amulticentrerandomisedblindedendpointcomparativeeffectivenessstudyofbraintissueoxygenandintracranialpressuremonitoringversusintracranialpressurealone