Cargando…

Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES: To identify patient, physician and geographic level factors that are associated with variation in initial stress testing strategy in patients evaluated for chest pain. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based study of patients undergoing evaluation for chest pain in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roifman, Idan, Han, Lu, Fang, Jiming, Chu, Anna, Austin, Peter, Ko, Dennis T, Douglas, Pamela, Wijeysundera, Harindra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059199
_version_ 1784667998388224000
author Roifman, Idan
Han, Lu
Fang, Jiming
Chu, Anna
Austin, Peter
Ko, Dennis T
Douglas, Pamela
Wijeysundera, Harindra
author_facet Roifman, Idan
Han, Lu
Fang, Jiming
Chu, Anna
Austin, Peter
Ko, Dennis T
Douglas, Pamela
Wijeysundera, Harindra
author_sort Roifman, Idan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify patient, physician and geographic level factors that are associated with variation in initial stress testing strategy in patients evaluated for chest pain. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based study of patients undergoing evaluation for chest pain in Ontario, Canada between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2018. PARTICIPANTS: 103 368 patients who underwent stress testing (graded exercise stress testing (GXT), stress echocardiography (stress echo) or myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)) following evaluation for chest pain. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To identify the patient, physician and geographic level factors associated with variation in initial test selection, we fit two separate 2-level hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models for which the outcome was initial stress testing strategy (GXT, MPI or stress echo). RESULTS: There was significant variability in the initial type of stress test performed, with approximately 50% receiving a GXT compared with approximately 36% who received MPI and 14% who received a stress echo. Physician-level factors were key drivers of this variation, accounting for up to 59.0% of the variation in initial testing. Physicians who graduated medical school >30 years ago were approximately 45% more likely to order an initial stress echo (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.80) than a GXT. Cardiovascular disease specialists were approximately sevenfold more likely to order an initial MPI (OR 7.35, 95% CI 5.38 to 10.03) than a GXT. Patients aged >70 years were approximately fivefold more likely to receive an MPI (OR 4.74, 95% CI 4.42 to 5.08) and approximately 26% more likely to receive a stress echo (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.38) than a GXT. CONCLUSIONS: We report significant variability in initial stress testing strategy in Ontario. Much of that variability was driven by physician-level factors that could potentially be addressed through educational campaigns geared at reducing this variability and improving guideline adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89153392022-03-25 Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study Roifman, Idan Han, Lu Fang, Jiming Chu, Anna Austin, Peter Ko, Dennis T Douglas, Pamela Wijeysundera, Harindra BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: To identify patient, physician and geographic level factors that are associated with variation in initial stress testing strategy in patients evaluated for chest pain. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based study of patients undergoing evaluation for chest pain in Ontario, Canada between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2018. PARTICIPANTS: 103 368 patients who underwent stress testing (graded exercise stress testing (GXT), stress echocardiography (stress echo) or myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)) following evaluation for chest pain. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To identify the patient, physician and geographic level factors associated with variation in initial test selection, we fit two separate 2-level hierarchical multinomial logistic regression models for which the outcome was initial stress testing strategy (GXT, MPI or stress echo). RESULTS: There was significant variability in the initial type of stress test performed, with approximately 50% receiving a GXT compared with approximately 36% who received MPI and 14% who received a stress echo. Physician-level factors were key drivers of this variation, accounting for up to 59.0% of the variation in initial testing. Physicians who graduated medical school >30 years ago were approximately 45% more likely to order an initial stress echo (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.80) than a GXT. Cardiovascular disease specialists were approximately sevenfold more likely to order an initial MPI (OR 7.35, 95% CI 5.38 to 10.03) than a GXT. Patients aged >70 years were approximately fivefold more likely to receive an MPI (OR 4.74, 95% CI 4.42 to 5.08) and approximately 26% more likely to receive a stress echo (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.38) than a GXT. CONCLUSIONS: We report significant variability in initial stress testing strategy in Ontario. Much of that variability was driven by physician-level factors that could potentially be addressed through educational campaigns geared at reducing this variability and improving guideline adherence. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8915339/ /pubmed/35273065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059199 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Roifman, Idan
Han, Lu
Fang, Jiming
Chu, Anna
Austin, Peter
Ko, Dennis T
Douglas, Pamela
Wijeysundera, Harindra
Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
title Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
title_full Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
title_fullStr Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
title_short Patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study
title_sort patient, physician and geographic predictors of cardiac stress testing strategy in ontario, canada: a population-based study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35273065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059199
work_keys_str_mv AT roifmanidan patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT hanlu patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT fangjiming patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT chuanna patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT austinpeter patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT kodennist patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT douglaspamela patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy
AT wijeysunderaharindra patientphysicianandgeographicpredictorsofcardiacstresstestingstrategyinontariocanadaapopulationbasedstudy