Cargando…

UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients at risk of mid-late term revision of hip replacement to inform targeted follow-up. DESIGN: Analysis of linked national data sets from primary and secondary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD-GOLD); National Joint Registry (NJR); English Hospital Episode S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Lindsay K, Garriga, Cesar, Kingsbury, Sarah R, Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael, Delmestri, Antonella, Arden, Nigel K, Stone, Martin, Conaghan, Philip G, Judge, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050877
_version_ 1784667998731108352
author Smith, Lindsay K
Garriga, Cesar
Kingsbury, Sarah R
Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael
Delmestri, Antonella
Arden, Nigel K
Stone, Martin
Conaghan, Philip G
Judge, Andrew
author_facet Smith, Lindsay K
Garriga, Cesar
Kingsbury, Sarah R
Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael
Delmestri, Antonella
Arden, Nigel K
Stone, Martin
Conaghan, Philip G
Judge, Andrew
author_sort Smith, Lindsay K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify patients at risk of mid-late term revision of hip replacement to inform targeted follow-up. DESIGN: Analysis of linked national data sets from primary and secondary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD-GOLD); National Joint Registry (NJR); English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES); Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)). PARTICIPANTS: Primary elective total hip replacement (THR) aged≥18. EVENT OF INTEREST: Revision surgery≥5 years (mid-late term) after primary THR. STATISTICAL METHODS: Cox regression modelling to ascertain risk factors of mid-late term revision. HR and 95% CI assessed association of sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, medication, surgical variables and PROMs with mid-late term revision. RESULTS: NJR-HES-PROMs data were available from 2008 to 2011 on 142 275 THR; mean age 70.0 years and 61.9% female. CPRD GOLD-HES data covered 1995–2011 on 17 047 THR; mean age 68.4 years, 61.8% female. Patients had minimum 5 years postprimary surgery to end 2016. In NJR-HES-PROMS data, there were 3582 (2.5%) revisions, median time-to-revision after primary surgery 1.9 years (range 0.01–8.7), with 598 (0.4%) mid-late term revisions; in CPRD GOLD, 982 (5.8%) revisions, median time-to-revision 5.3 years (range 0–20), with 520 (3.1%) mid-late term revisions. Reduced risk of mid-late term revision was associated with older age at primary surgery (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.96); better 6-month postoperative pain/function scores (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.46); use of ceramic-on-ceramic (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.95) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.00) bearing surfaces. Increased risk of mid-late term revision was associated with the use of antidepressants (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.59), glucocorticoid injections (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.67) and femoral head size≥44 mm (HR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.09 to 6.02) No association of gender, obesity or Index of Multiple Deprivation was observed. CONCLUSION: The risk of mid-late term THR is associated with age at primary surgery, 6-month postoperative pain and function and implant factors. Further work is needed to explore the associations with prescription medications observed in our data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89153402022-03-25 UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study Smith, Lindsay K Garriga, Cesar Kingsbury, Sarah R Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael Delmestri, Antonella Arden, Nigel K Stone, Martin Conaghan, Philip G Judge, Andrew BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: To identify patients at risk of mid-late term revision of hip replacement to inform targeted follow-up. DESIGN: Analysis of linked national data sets from primary and secondary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD-GOLD); National Joint Registry (NJR); English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES); Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)). PARTICIPANTS: Primary elective total hip replacement (THR) aged≥18. EVENT OF INTEREST: Revision surgery≥5 years (mid-late term) after primary THR. STATISTICAL METHODS: Cox regression modelling to ascertain risk factors of mid-late term revision. HR and 95% CI assessed association of sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, medication, surgical variables and PROMs with mid-late term revision. RESULTS: NJR-HES-PROMs data were available from 2008 to 2011 on 142 275 THR; mean age 70.0 years and 61.9% female. CPRD GOLD-HES data covered 1995–2011 on 17 047 THR; mean age 68.4 years, 61.8% female. Patients had minimum 5 years postprimary surgery to end 2016. In NJR-HES-PROMS data, there were 3582 (2.5%) revisions, median time-to-revision after primary surgery 1.9 years (range 0.01–8.7), with 598 (0.4%) mid-late term revisions; in CPRD GOLD, 982 (5.8%) revisions, median time-to-revision 5.3 years (range 0–20), with 520 (3.1%) mid-late term revisions. Reduced risk of mid-late term revision was associated with older age at primary surgery (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.96); better 6-month postoperative pain/function scores (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.46); use of ceramic-on-ceramic (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.95) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.00) bearing surfaces. Increased risk of mid-late term revision was associated with the use of antidepressants (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.59), glucocorticoid injections (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.67) and femoral head size≥44 mm (HR: 2.56; 95% CI: 1.09 to 6.02) No association of gender, obesity or Index of Multiple Deprivation was observed. CONCLUSION: The risk of mid-late term THR is associated with age at primary surgery, 6-month postoperative pain and function and implant factors. Further work is needed to explore the associations with prescription medications observed in our data. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8915340/ /pubmed/35264338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050877 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Smith, Lindsay K
Garriga, Cesar
Kingsbury, Sarah R
Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael
Delmestri, Antonella
Arden, Nigel K
Stone, Martin
Conaghan, Philip G
Judge, Andrew
UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study
title UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study
title_full UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study
title_short UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? Retrospective cohort study
title_sort uk post arthroplasty follow-up recommendations (uk safe): what does analysis of linked, routinely collected national data sets tell us about mid-late term revision risk after hip replacement? retrospective cohort study
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35264338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050877
work_keys_str_mv AT smithlindsayk ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT garrigacesar ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kingsburysarahr ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pinedovillanuevarafael ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT delmestriantonella ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ardennigelk ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT stonemartin ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT conaghanphilipg ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy
AT judgeandrew ukpostarthroplastyfollowuprecommendationsuksafewhatdoesanalysisoflinkedroutinelycollectednationaldatasetstellusaboutmidlatetermrevisionriskafterhipreplacementretrospectivecohortstudy