Cargando…
Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths among males worldwide. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a predictive indicator of prostate pathology. Men with elevated PSA levels are at increased risk of developing PC. There is currently no UK national PC screenin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001701 |
_version_ | 1784668007041073152 |
---|---|
author | Limaye, Neil Zorzato, Daniele Nadarajasundaram, Aaruran Ong, Sabrina B Y |
author_facet | Limaye, Neil Zorzato, Daniele Nadarajasundaram, Aaruran Ong, Sabrina B Y |
author_sort | Limaye, Neil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths among males worldwide. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a predictive indicator of prostate pathology. Men with elevated PSA levels are at increased risk of developing PC. There is currently no UK national PC screening programme, therefore patients often present to general practices (GPs) at later stages of pathology, worsening patient prognosis and outcomes. LOCAL PROBLEM: The location of the GP surgery had a large patient population at increased risk of PC, namely Afro-Caribbean/Asian males. METHODS: We conducted baseline measurements to identify male patients over the age of 65 and/or male patients who were at high risk of developing PC. These included previous referred patients or patients with a PSA over 10.0. We then implemented three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles and measured their effect after 2 weeks of starting the respective intervention. INTERVENTIONS: PDSA1: Generating a list of target patients who have not had repeat/follow-up/referral and directly contacting by telephone to invite them for a blood test. PDSA2: Creating patient-specific electronic pop-up reminders on the electronic-patient-record system for PSA follow-up/referral/repeat test. Planned PDSA3: Patient education of prostate health and general self-checking, as well as benefits/risks of undergoing PSA screening in the form of patient focus groups and informative leaflets. RESULTS: We identified 220 male patients over 65 registered at a large South London GP surgery. 77.7% of eligible patients had a PSA measurement since 1 April 2019. Our results showed an overall increase in screening of 13.5% from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our project identified patients that may potentially have undiagnosed prostate pathology. However, a key factor for not reaching our goal was blood test refusal. This was further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, impacting the capacity to disseminate appropriate information to the local population on the importance of PSA screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89153752022-03-25 Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme Limaye, Neil Zorzato, Daniele Nadarajasundaram, Aaruran Ong, Sabrina B Y BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths among males worldwide. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a predictive indicator of prostate pathology. Men with elevated PSA levels are at increased risk of developing PC. There is currently no UK national PC screening programme, therefore patients often present to general practices (GPs) at later stages of pathology, worsening patient prognosis and outcomes. LOCAL PROBLEM: The location of the GP surgery had a large patient population at increased risk of PC, namely Afro-Caribbean/Asian males. METHODS: We conducted baseline measurements to identify male patients over the age of 65 and/or male patients who were at high risk of developing PC. These included previous referred patients or patients with a PSA over 10.0. We then implemented three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles and measured their effect after 2 weeks of starting the respective intervention. INTERVENTIONS: PDSA1: Generating a list of target patients who have not had repeat/follow-up/referral and directly contacting by telephone to invite them for a blood test. PDSA2: Creating patient-specific electronic pop-up reminders on the electronic-patient-record system for PSA follow-up/referral/repeat test. Planned PDSA3: Patient education of prostate health and general self-checking, as well as benefits/risks of undergoing PSA screening in the form of patient focus groups and informative leaflets. RESULTS: We identified 220 male patients over 65 registered at a large South London GP surgery. 77.7% of eligible patients had a PSA measurement since 1 April 2019. Our results showed an overall increase in screening of 13.5% from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our project identified patients that may potentially have undiagnosed prostate pathology. However, a key factor for not reaching our goal was blood test refusal. This was further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, impacting the capacity to disseminate appropriate information to the local population on the importance of PSA screening. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8915375/ /pubmed/35272998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001701 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Quality Improvement Report Limaye, Neil Zorzato, Daniele Nadarajasundaram, Aaruran Ong, Sabrina B Y Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
title | Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
title_full | Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
title_fullStr | Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
title_short | Increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
title_sort | increasing the uptake in a general practice prostate cancer screening programme |
topic | Quality Improvement Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35272998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limayeneil increasingtheuptakeinageneralpracticeprostatecancerscreeningprogramme AT zorzatodaniele increasingtheuptakeinageneralpracticeprostatecancerscreeningprogramme AT nadarajasundaramaaruran increasingtheuptakeinageneralpracticeprostatecancerscreeningprogramme AT ongsabrinaby increasingtheuptakeinageneralpracticeprostatecancerscreeningprogramme |