Cargando…

Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft

BACKGROUND: Anterior debridement, decompression, bone grafting, and instrumentation are safe and effective techniques for patients with lower cervical spine tuberculosis. However, there is no consensus regarding the methods for using autogenous bone grafts. The purpose of this retrospective study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Shuang, Wang, Gaoju, Yang, Jin, Zhang, Shuai, Song, Yueming, Wang, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05177-0
_version_ 1784668035413442560
author Xu, Shuang
Wang, Gaoju
Yang, Jin
Zhang, Shuai
Song, Yueming
Wang, Qing
author_facet Xu, Shuang
Wang, Gaoju
Yang, Jin
Zhang, Shuai
Song, Yueming
Wang, Qing
author_sort Xu, Shuang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior debridement, decompression, bone grafting, and instrumentation are safe and effective techniques for patients with lower cervical spine tuberculosis. However, there is no consensus regarding the methods for using autogenous bone grafts. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior surgical management for cervical spine tuberculosis by using an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft. METHODS: From January 2009 to September 2018, 23 patients with cervical spine tuberculosis were treated with anterior debridement, autogenous structural bone grafting and fixation at our spinal department. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the different graft materials, namely, iliac crest bone grafts (Group A) and structural manubrium grafts (Group B). The clinical and radiographic results of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 24 months. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients without failure of internal fixation. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the operation time, blood loss, fusion time, neurological outcomes, or postoperative local Cobb angle (P > .05). However, the donor site complication rate in Group A was greater than that in Group B. The postoperative ambulation time in Group A was later than that in Group B. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for donor site pain in Group A was higher than that in Group B at 1 week after surgery (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at the last visit (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Both iliac bone grafts and sternal manubrium grafts can effectively reconstruct anterior column defects in anterior surgery. However, structural sternal manubrium autografts cause fewer complications associated with donor site morbidities than iliac bone grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89154942022-03-18 Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft Xu, Shuang Wang, Gaoju Yang, Jin Zhang, Shuai Song, Yueming Wang, Qing BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Anterior debridement, decompression, bone grafting, and instrumentation are safe and effective techniques for patients with lower cervical spine tuberculosis. However, there is no consensus regarding the methods for using autogenous bone grafts. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical outcomes of anterior surgical management for cervical spine tuberculosis by using an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft. METHODS: From January 2009 to September 2018, 23 patients with cervical spine tuberculosis were treated with anterior debridement, autogenous structural bone grafting and fixation at our spinal department. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the different graft materials, namely, iliac crest bone grafts (Group A) and structural manubrium grafts (Group B). The clinical and radiographic results of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of follow-up was 24 months. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients without failure of internal fixation. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the operation time, blood loss, fusion time, neurological outcomes, or postoperative local Cobb angle (P > .05). However, the donor site complication rate in Group A was greater than that in Group B. The postoperative ambulation time in Group A was later than that in Group B. The mean visual analog scale (VAS) score for donor site pain in Group A was higher than that in Group B at 1 week after surgery (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups at the last visit (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Both iliac bone grafts and sternal manubrium grafts can effectively reconstruct anterior column defects in anterior surgery. However, structural sternal manubrium autografts cause fewer complications associated with donor site morbidities than iliac bone grafts. BioMed Central 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8915494/ /pubmed/35277155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05177-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Shuang
Wang, Gaoju
Yang, Jin
Zhang, Shuai
Song, Yueming
Wang, Qing
Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
title Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
title_full Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
title_fullStr Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
title_full_unstemmed Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
title_short Anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
title_sort anterior debridement, bone grafting and fixation for cervical spine tuberculosis: an iliac bone graft versus a structural manubrium graft
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35277155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05177-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xushuang anteriordebridementbonegraftingandfixationforcervicalspinetuberculosisaniliacbonegraftversusastructuralmanubriumgraft
AT wanggaoju anteriordebridementbonegraftingandfixationforcervicalspinetuberculosisaniliacbonegraftversusastructuralmanubriumgraft
AT yangjin anteriordebridementbonegraftingandfixationforcervicalspinetuberculosisaniliacbonegraftversusastructuralmanubriumgraft
AT zhangshuai anteriordebridementbonegraftingandfixationforcervicalspinetuberculosisaniliacbonegraftversusastructuralmanubriumgraft
AT songyueming anteriordebridementbonegraftingandfixationforcervicalspinetuberculosisaniliacbonegraftversusastructuralmanubriumgraft
AT wangqing anteriordebridementbonegraftingandfixationforcervicalspinetuberculosisaniliacbonegraftversusastructuralmanubriumgraft