Cargando…
Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.721357 |
_version_ | 1784668053192048640 |
---|---|
author | Nadeau, Stephen E. Wu, Jeffrey K. Lawhern, Richard A. |
author_facet | Nadeau, Stephen E. Wu, Jeffrey K. Lawhern, Richard A. |
author_sort | Nadeau, Stephen E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability in opioid dose requirements and side effects. The estimated risk of death from opioid treatment involving doses above 100 MMED is ~0.25%/year. Multiple large studies refute the concept that short-term use of opioids to treat acute pain predisposes to development of opioid use disorder. The prevalence of opioid use disorder associated with prescription opioids is likely <3%. Morbidity, mortality, and financial costs of inadequate treatment of the 18 million Americans with moderate to severe chronic pain are high. Because of the absence of comparative effectiveness studies, there are no scientific grounds for considering alternative non-pharmacologic treatments as an adequate substitute for opioid therapy but these treatments might serve to augment opioid therapy, thereby reducing dosage. There are reasons to question the ostensible risks of co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. As the causes of the opioid crisis have come into focus, it has become clear that the crisis resides predominantly in the streets and that efforts to curtail it by constraining opioid treatment in the clinic are unlikely to succeed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915556 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89155562022-03-15 Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence Nadeau, Stephen E. Wu, Jeffrey K. Lawhern, Richard A. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability in opioid dose requirements and side effects. The estimated risk of death from opioid treatment involving doses above 100 MMED is ~0.25%/year. Multiple large studies refute the concept that short-term use of opioids to treat acute pain predisposes to development of opioid use disorder. The prevalence of opioid use disorder associated with prescription opioids is likely <3%. Morbidity, mortality, and financial costs of inadequate treatment of the 18 million Americans with moderate to severe chronic pain are high. Because of the absence of comparative effectiveness studies, there are no scientific grounds for considering alternative non-pharmacologic treatments as an adequate substitute for opioid therapy but these treatments might serve to augment opioid therapy, thereby reducing dosage. There are reasons to question the ostensible risks of co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. As the causes of the opioid crisis have come into focus, it has become clear that the crisis resides predominantly in the streets and that efforts to curtail it by constraining opioid treatment in the clinic are unlikely to succeed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8915556/ /pubmed/35295493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.721357 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nadeau, Wu and Lawhern. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pain Research Nadeau, Stephen E. Wu, Jeffrey K. Lawhern, Richard A. Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence |
title | Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence |
title_full | Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence |
title_fullStr | Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence |
title_short | Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence |
title_sort | opioids and chronic pain: an analytic review of the clinical evidence |
topic | Pain Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915556/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.721357 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nadeaustephene opioidsandchronicpainananalyticreviewoftheclinicalevidence AT wujeffreyk opioidsandchronicpainananalyticreviewoftheclinicalevidence AT lawhernricharda opioidsandchronicpainananalyticreviewoftheclinicalevidence |