Cargando…

Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence

We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nadeau, Stephen E., Wu, Jeffrey K., Lawhern, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.721357
_version_ 1784668053192048640
author Nadeau, Stephen E.
Wu, Jeffrey K.
Lawhern, Richard A.
author_facet Nadeau, Stephen E.
Wu, Jeffrey K.
Lawhern, Richard A.
author_sort Nadeau, Stephen E.
collection PubMed
description We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability in opioid dose requirements and side effects. The estimated risk of death from opioid treatment involving doses above 100 MMED is ~0.25%/year. Multiple large studies refute the concept that short-term use of opioids to treat acute pain predisposes to development of opioid use disorder. The prevalence of opioid use disorder associated with prescription opioids is likely <3%. Morbidity, mortality, and financial costs of inadequate treatment of the 18 million Americans with moderate to severe chronic pain are high. Because of the absence of comparative effectiveness studies, there are no scientific grounds for considering alternative non-pharmacologic treatments as an adequate substitute for opioid therapy but these treatments might serve to augment opioid therapy, thereby reducing dosage. There are reasons to question the ostensible risks of co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. As the causes of the opioid crisis have come into focus, it has become clear that the crisis resides predominantly in the streets and that efforts to curtail it by constraining opioid treatment in the clinic are unlikely to succeed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89155562022-03-15 Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence Nadeau, Stephen E. Wu, Jeffrey K. Lawhern, Richard A. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research We conducted an analytic review of the clinical scientific literature bearing on the use of opioids for treatment of chronic non-cancer pain in the United States. There is substantial, albeit not definitive, scientific evidence of the effectiveness of opioids in treating pain and of high variability in opioid dose requirements and side effects. The estimated risk of death from opioid treatment involving doses above 100 MMED is ~0.25%/year. Multiple large studies refute the concept that short-term use of opioids to treat acute pain predisposes to development of opioid use disorder. The prevalence of opioid use disorder associated with prescription opioids is likely <3%. Morbidity, mortality, and financial costs of inadequate treatment of the 18 million Americans with moderate to severe chronic pain are high. Because of the absence of comparative effectiveness studies, there are no scientific grounds for considering alternative non-pharmacologic treatments as an adequate substitute for opioid therapy but these treatments might serve to augment opioid therapy, thereby reducing dosage. There are reasons to question the ostensible risks of co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. As the causes of the opioid crisis have come into focus, it has become clear that the crisis resides predominantly in the streets and that efforts to curtail it by constraining opioid treatment in the clinic are unlikely to succeed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8915556/ /pubmed/35295493 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.721357 Text en Copyright © 2021 Nadeau, Wu and Lawhern. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Nadeau, Stephen E.
Wu, Jeffrey K.
Lawhern, Richard A.
Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
title Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
title_full Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
title_fullStr Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
title_short Opioids and Chronic Pain: An Analytic Review of the Clinical Evidence
title_sort opioids and chronic pain: an analytic review of the clinical evidence
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295493
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.721357
work_keys_str_mv AT nadeaustephene opioidsandchronicpainananalyticreviewoftheclinicalevidence
AT wujeffreyk opioidsandchronicpainananalyticreviewoftheclinicalevidence
AT lawhernricharda opioidsandchronicpainananalyticreviewoftheclinicalevidence