Cargando…
Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). METHODS: We describe a case series of 25 individuals with PSPS who underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: Th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.847504 |
_version_ | 1784668058920419328 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Graeme Sampson Burns, Joanna Jane Schneider, Andre Perillier El Helou, Antonios |
author_facet | Mullins, Graeme Sampson Burns, Joanna Jane Schneider, Andre Perillier El Helou, Antonios |
author_sort | Mullins, Graeme Sampson |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). METHODS: We describe a case series of 25 individuals with PSPS who underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in mean visual analog scale pain scores in the immediate postoperative phase, (8.61 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001). There were twelve patients who consumed pre-operative opioid, and 75% showed reduction of use with a significantly lower average daily dose (66.8 vs. 26.9 meq/D, p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index during postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). There were no major perioperative or long-term complications from the procedure in follow-up. CONCLUSION: The analysis of this cohort suggests successful long-term treatment of a diverse set of patients with PSPS who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and had meaningful improvement in quality of life and reduction in opioid consumption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8915574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89155742022-03-15 Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series Mullins, Graeme Sampson Burns, Joanna Jane Schneider, Andre Perillier El Helou, Antonios Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). METHODS: We describe a case series of 25 individuals with PSPS who underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in mean visual analog scale pain scores in the immediate postoperative phase, (8.61 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001). There were twelve patients who consumed pre-operative opioid, and 75% showed reduction of use with a significantly lower average daily dose (66.8 vs. 26.9 meq/D, p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index during postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). There were no major perioperative or long-term complications from the procedure in follow-up. CONCLUSION: The analysis of this cohort suggests successful long-term treatment of a diverse set of patients with PSPS who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and had meaningful improvement in quality of life and reduction in opioid consumption. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8915574/ /pubmed/35295798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.847504 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mullins, Burns, Schneider and El Helou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pain Research Mullins, Graeme Sampson Burns, Joanna Jane Schneider, Andre Perillier El Helou, Antonios Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series |
title | Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series |
title_full | Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series |
title_fullStr | Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series |
title_full_unstemmed | Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series |
title_short | Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series |
title_sort | spinal cord stimulation as an alternative to opioid for axial neck and back pain: a case series |
topic | Pain Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.847504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullinsgraemesampson spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries AT burnsjoannajane spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries AT schneiderandreperillier spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries AT elhelouantonios spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries |