Cargando…

Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). METHODS: We describe a case series of 25 individuals with PSPS who underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, Graeme Sampson, Burns, Joanna Jane, Schneider, Andre Perillier, El Helou, Antonios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.847504
_version_ 1784668058920419328
author Mullins, Graeme Sampson
Burns, Joanna Jane
Schneider, Andre Perillier
El Helou, Antonios
author_facet Mullins, Graeme Sampson
Burns, Joanna Jane
Schneider, Andre Perillier
El Helou, Antonios
author_sort Mullins, Graeme Sampson
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). METHODS: We describe a case series of 25 individuals with PSPS who underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in mean visual analog scale pain scores in the immediate postoperative phase, (8.61 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001). There were twelve patients who consumed pre-operative opioid, and 75% showed reduction of use with a significantly lower average daily dose (66.8 vs. 26.9 meq/D, p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index during postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). There were no major perioperative or long-term complications from the procedure in follow-up. CONCLUSION: The analysis of this cohort suggests successful long-term treatment of a diverse set of patients with PSPS who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and had meaningful improvement in quality of life and reduction in opioid consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89155742022-03-15 Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series Mullins, Graeme Sampson Burns, Joanna Jane Schneider, Andre Perillier El Helou, Antonios Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). METHODS: We describe a case series of 25 individuals with PSPS who underwent implantation of a spinal cord stimulator device between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in mean visual analog scale pain scores in the immediate postoperative phase, (8.61 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001). There were twelve patients who consumed pre-operative opioid, and 75% showed reduction of use with a significantly lower average daily dose (66.8 vs. 26.9 meq/D, p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index during postoperative follow-up visits (p < 0.001). There were no major perioperative or long-term complications from the procedure in follow-up. CONCLUSION: The analysis of this cohort suggests successful long-term treatment of a diverse set of patients with PSPS who underwent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and had meaningful improvement in quality of life and reduction in opioid consumption. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8915574/ /pubmed/35295798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.847504 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mullins, Burns, Schneider and El Helou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Mullins, Graeme Sampson
Burns, Joanna Jane
Schneider, Andre Perillier
El Helou, Antonios
Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
title Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
title_full Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
title_fullStr Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
title_short Spinal Cord Stimulation as an Alternative to Opioid for Axial Neck and Back Pain: A Case Series
title_sort spinal cord stimulation as an alternative to opioid for axial neck and back pain: a case series
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2022.847504
work_keys_str_mv AT mullinsgraemesampson spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries
AT burnsjoannajane spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries
AT schneiderandreperillier spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries
AT elhelouantonios spinalcordstimulationasanalternativetoopioidforaxialneckandbackpainacaseseries