Cargando…

Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has proven benefits in controlling chronic low back pain and can be performed via the midline interlaminar (MIL) or transforaminal (TF) approach. A modified interlaminar approach, the parasagittal interlaminar (PIL), has surfaced as a more reliable, safe,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick, Paredes, Stephania, Cantillo, Santiago, Hamid, Albara, Candido, Kenneth D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.676730
_version_ 1784668102734118912
author Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick
Paredes, Stephania
Cantillo, Santiago
Hamid, Albara
Candido, Kenneth D.
author_facet Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick
Paredes, Stephania
Cantillo, Santiago
Hamid, Albara
Candido, Kenneth D.
author_sort Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick
collection PubMed
description Background: Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has proven benefits in controlling chronic low back pain and can be performed via the midline interlaminar (MIL) or transforaminal (TF) approach. A modified interlaminar approach, the parasagittal interlaminar (PIL), has surfaced as a more reliable, safe, and suitable approach to minimize complications related to MIL and TF. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of PIL with both MIL and TF approaches in adult patients with a history of chronic low back pain. Methods: A literature search was conducted using major electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Selected studies included patients with unilateral radicular symptoms, secondary to lumbar intervertebral disc hernias or degenerative lumbar disc disease, that, additionally, received ESIs via PIL or either MIL or TF under fluoroscopic guidance. Randomized and observational studies with pain relief score and/or functional disability assessment and at least a 2-week follow-up were included. Results: The search led to the initial identification of 174 studies. Following the screening, eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis and seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the statistical analysis. PIL showed statistically significantly more pain relief and functional improvement than MIL at 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-procedure. Compared to TF, PIL showed statistically significantly more pain relief at 3- and 6-month after the procedure. Additionally, PIL showed benefits in terms of lower mean fluoroscopy time, less radiation exposure, zero adverse events in all the included studies, no cases of intravascular spread compared with the TF approach, and a higher anterior epidural spread (AES) of PIL compared with TF. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the PIL approach is an effective and safe alternative to the MIL and TF approaches in patients presenting with chronic low back pain when epidural injections are indicated, demonstrating a higher level of pain relief and a stronger improvement in functionality post-procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89157092022-03-15 Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick Paredes, Stephania Cantillo, Santiago Hamid, Albara Candido, Kenneth D. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research Background: Epidural steroid injection (ESI) has proven benefits in controlling chronic low back pain and can be performed via the midline interlaminar (MIL) or transforaminal (TF) approach. A modified interlaminar approach, the parasagittal interlaminar (PIL), has surfaced as a more reliable, safe, and suitable approach to minimize complications related to MIL and TF. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and compare the effectiveness and safety of PIL with both MIL and TF approaches in adult patients with a history of chronic low back pain. Methods: A literature search was conducted using major electronic databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Selected studies included patients with unilateral radicular symptoms, secondary to lumbar intervertebral disc hernias or degenerative lumbar disc disease, that, additionally, received ESIs via PIL or either MIL or TF under fluoroscopic guidance. Randomized and observational studies with pain relief score and/or functional disability assessment and at least a 2-week follow-up were included. Results: The search led to the initial identification of 174 studies. Following the screening, eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis and seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the statistical analysis. PIL showed statistically significantly more pain relief and functional improvement than MIL at 1-, 3-, and 6-month post-procedure. Compared to TF, PIL showed statistically significantly more pain relief at 3- and 6-month after the procedure. Additionally, PIL showed benefits in terms of lower mean fluoroscopy time, less radiation exposure, zero adverse events in all the included studies, no cases of intravascular spread compared with the TF approach, and a higher anterior epidural spread (AES) of PIL compared with TF. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that the PIL approach is an effective and safe alternative to the MIL and TF approaches in patients presenting with chronic low back pain when epidural injections are indicated, demonstrating a higher level of pain relief and a stronger improvement in functionality post-procedure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8915709/ /pubmed/35295439 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.676730 Text en Copyright © 2021 Knezevic, Paredes, Cantillo, Hamid and Candido. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Knezevic, Nebojsa Nick
Paredes, Stephania
Cantillo, Santiago
Hamid, Albara
Candido, Kenneth D.
Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Parasagittal Approach of Epidural Steroid Injection as a Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort parasagittal approach of epidural steroid injection as a treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295439
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.676730
work_keys_str_mv AT knezevicnebojsanick parasagittalapproachofepiduralsteroidinjectionasatreatmentforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paredesstephania parasagittalapproachofepiduralsteroidinjectionasatreatmentforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cantillosantiago parasagittalapproachofepiduralsteroidinjectionasatreatmentforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hamidalbara parasagittalapproachofepiduralsteroidinjectionasatreatmentforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT candidokennethd parasagittalapproachofepiduralsteroidinjectionasatreatmentforchroniclowbackpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis