Cargando…

Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation

Temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) can be measured using a thermode and a cold pressor test (CPT). Unfortunately, these tools are complex, expensive, and are ill-suited for routine clinical assessments. Building on the results from an exploratory study that attemp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sean, Monica, Coulombe-Lévêque, Alexia, Bordeleau, Martine, Vincenot, Matthieu, Gendron, Louis, Marchand, Serge, Léonard, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.659563
_version_ 1784668115868581888
author Sean, Monica
Coulombe-Lévêque, Alexia
Bordeleau, Martine
Vincenot, Matthieu
Gendron, Louis
Marchand, Serge
Léonard, Guillaume
author_facet Sean, Monica
Coulombe-Lévêque, Alexia
Bordeleau, Martine
Vincenot, Matthieu
Gendron, Louis
Marchand, Serge
Léonard, Guillaume
author_sort Sean, Monica
collection PubMed
description Temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) can be measured using a thermode and a cold pressor test (CPT). Unfortunately, these tools are complex, expensive, and are ill-suited for routine clinical assessments. Building on the results from an exploratory study that attempted to use transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to measure CPM and TSP, the present study assesses whether a “new” TENS protocol can be used instead of the thermode and CPT to measure CPM and TSP. The objective of this study was to compare the thermode/CPT protocol with the new TENS protocol, by (1) measuring the association between the TSP evoked by the two protocols; (2) measuring the association between the CPM evoked by the two protocols; and by (3) assessing whether the two protocols successfully trigger TSP and CPM in a similar number of participants. We assessed TSP and CPM in 50 healthy participants, using our new TENS protocol and a thermode/CPT protocol (repeated measures and randomized order). In the TENS protocol, both the test stimulus (TS) and the conditioning stimulus (CS) were delivered using TENS; in the thermode/CPT protocol, the TS was delivered using a thermode and the CS consisted of a CPT. There was no association between the response evoked by the two protocols, neither for TSP nor for CPM. The number of participants showing TSP [49 with TENS and 29 with thermode (p < 0.001)] and CPM [16 with TENS and 30 with thermode (p = 0.01)] was different in both protocols. Our results suggest that response to one modality does not predict response to the other; as such, TENS cannot be used instead of a thermode/CPT protocol to assess TSP and CPM without significantly affecting the results. Moreover, while at first glance it appears that TENS is more effective than the thermode/CPT protocol to induce TSP, but less so to induce CPM, these results should be interpreted carefully. Indeed, TSP and CPM response appear to be modality-dependent as opposed to an absolute phenomenon, and the two protocols may tap into entirely different mechanisms, especially in the case of TSP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89157522022-03-15 Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation Sean, Monica Coulombe-Lévêque, Alexia Bordeleau, Martine Vincenot, Matthieu Gendron, Louis Marchand, Serge Léonard, Guillaume Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research Temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) can be measured using a thermode and a cold pressor test (CPT). Unfortunately, these tools are complex, expensive, and are ill-suited for routine clinical assessments. Building on the results from an exploratory study that attempted to use transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to measure CPM and TSP, the present study assesses whether a “new” TENS protocol can be used instead of the thermode and CPT to measure CPM and TSP. The objective of this study was to compare the thermode/CPT protocol with the new TENS protocol, by (1) measuring the association between the TSP evoked by the two protocols; (2) measuring the association between the CPM evoked by the two protocols; and by (3) assessing whether the two protocols successfully trigger TSP and CPM in a similar number of participants. We assessed TSP and CPM in 50 healthy participants, using our new TENS protocol and a thermode/CPT protocol (repeated measures and randomized order). In the TENS protocol, both the test stimulus (TS) and the conditioning stimulus (CS) were delivered using TENS; in the thermode/CPT protocol, the TS was delivered using a thermode and the CS consisted of a CPT. There was no association between the response evoked by the two protocols, neither for TSP nor for CPM. The number of participants showing TSP [49 with TENS and 29 with thermode (p < 0.001)] and CPM [16 with TENS and 30 with thermode (p = 0.01)] was different in both protocols. Our results suggest that response to one modality does not predict response to the other; as such, TENS cannot be used instead of a thermode/CPT protocol to assess TSP and CPM without significantly affecting the results. Moreover, while at first glance it appears that TENS is more effective than the thermode/CPT protocol to induce TSP, but less so to induce CPM, these results should be interpreted carefully. Indeed, TSP and CPM response appear to be modality-dependent as opposed to an absolute phenomenon, and the two protocols may tap into entirely different mechanisms, especially in the case of TSP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8915752/ /pubmed/35295416 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.659563 Text en Copyright © 2021 Sean, Coulombe-Lévêque, Bordeleau, Vincenot, Gendron, Marchand and Léonard. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Sean, Monica
Coulombe-Lévêque, Alexia
Bordeleau, Martine
Vincenot, Matthieu
Gendron, Louis
Marchand, Serge
Léonard, Guillaume
Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation
title Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation
title_full Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation
title_fullStr Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation
title_short Comparison of Thermal and Electrical Modalities in the Assessment of Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation
title_sort comparison of thermal and electrical modalities in the assessment of temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35295416
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2021.659563
work_keys_str_mv AT seanmonica comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation
AT coulombelevequealexia comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation
AT bordeleaumartine comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation
AT vincenotmatthieu comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation
AT gendronlouis comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation
AT marchandserge comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation
AT leonardguillaume comparisonofthermalandelectricalmodalitiesintheassessmentoftemporalsummationofpainandconditionedpainmodulation