Cargando…

Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda

The history of the scientific enterprise demonstrates that it has supported gender, identity, and racial inequity. Further, its institutions have allowed discrimination, harassment, and personal harm of racialized persons and women. This has resulted in a suboptimal and demographically narrow resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graves, Joseph L., Kearney, Maureen, Barabino, Gilda, Malcom, Shirley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117831119
_version_ 1784668178017681408
author Graves, Joseph L.
Kearney, Maureen
Barabino, Gilda
Malcom, Shirley
author_facet Graves, Joseph L.
Kearney, Maureen
Barabino, Gilda
Malcom, Shirley
author_sort Graves, Joseph L.
collection PubMed
description The history of the scientific enterprise demonstrates that it has supported gender, identity, and racial inequity. Further, its institutions have allowed discrimination, harassment, and personal harm of racialized persons and women. This has resulted in a suboptimal and demographically narrow research and innovation system, a concomitant limited lens on research agendas, and less effective knowledge translation between science and society. We argue that, to reverse this situation, the scientific community must reexamine its values and then collectively embark upon a moonshot-level new agenda for equity. This new agenda should be based upon the foundational value that scientific research and technological innovation should be prefaced upon progress toward a better world for all of society and that the process of how we conduct research is just as important as the results of research. Such an agenda will attract individuals who have been historically excluded from participation in science, but we will need to engage in substantial work to overcome the longstanding obstacles to their full participation. We highlight the need to implement this new agenda via a coordinated systems approach, recognizing the mutually reinforcing feedback dynamics among all science system components and aligning our equity efforts across them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8915968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89159682022-03-12 Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda Graves, Joseph L. Kearney, Maureen Barabino, Gilda Malcom, Shirley Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective The history of the scientific enterprise demonstrates that it has supported gender, identity, and racial inequity. Further, its institutions have allowed discrimination, harassment, and personal harm of racialized persons and women. This has resulted in a suboptimal and demographically narrow research and innovation system, a concomitant limited lens on research agendas, and less effective knowledge translation between science and society. We argue that, to reverse this situation, the scientific community must reexamine its values and then collectively embark upon a moonshot-level new agenda for equity. This new agenda should be based upon the foundational value that scientific research and technological innovation should be prefaced upon progress toward a better world for all of society and that the process of how we conduct research is just as important as the results of research. Such an agenda will attract individuals who have been historically excluded from participation in science, but we will need to engage in substantial work to overcome the longstanding obstacles to their full participation. We highlight the need to implement this new agenda via a coordinated systems approach, recognizing the mutually reinforcing feedback dynamics among all science system components and aligning our equity efforts across them. National Academy of Sciences 2022-02-24 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8915968/ /pubmed/35210356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117831119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
Graves, Joseph L.
Kearney, Maureen
Barabino, Gilda
Malcom, Shirley
Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
title Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
title_full Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
title_fullStr Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
title_full_unstemmed Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
title_short Inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
title_sort inequality in science and the case for a new agenda
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8915968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117831119
work_keys_str_mv AT gravesjosephl inequalityinscienceandthecaseforanewagenda
AT kearneymaureen inequalityinscienceandthecaseforanewagenda
AT barabinogilda inequalityinscienceandthecaseforanewagenda
AT malcomshirley inequalityinscienceandthecaseforanewagenda